Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So the Mac Pro Pro Max Plus needs to be out by this time next year for them to stick to their 2-year timeline.

Is there anything else still needing an M1 update? The big/pro iMac maybe?
couldn't name it that Samsung would sue, they have plus locked up
 
Absolutely love my M1 MBP, does about everything I need. Speedy, great battery life and just a overall great software experience. I noticed I am use iWork for more of my tasks than Office too. Sure, I would have loved the 16 inch form factor last year, but everything happens for a reason. Don’t see myself upgrading until 2025.
 
Promising results so far. It will be interesting to see what they have planned for the larger iMac and Mac Pro.
 
If by transition, you mean the transition of your battery life from 100% to 0% in no time.

The A series chips are already close enough, there's no need to try put a laptop chip in a phone.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple is already working on it. Wasn’t there a report out, Apple was working on in-house chips for the iPhones? Couple years ago?
 
Chin is here to stay.
Guarantee you the 24 inch iMac is a good benchmark of what the 27 inch iMac will look like, just with black borders instead of white ones.
Maybe slap a notch on top for giggles and memes, but even that is unlikely.
I'm counting on FaceID for the higher-end models. It would make sense with the increased chassis size, even if Apple uses more powerful chips than the M1 Pro/Max (doubtful) and the cooling needs are greater (not incredibly so). If I recall correctly, the FaceID module in the iPhone 13 is at most 6.2mm thick (iPhone 13 Pro thickness - approx 20%) and the 24" M1 iMac is about 11.5mm, so I'd guess there's ample room to put FaceID there, where it does make more sense - versus in a super-thin laptop lid/screen which is used/wakes up slightly differently compared to a desktop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
couldn't name it that Samsung would sue, they have plus locked up
Um…
Apple TV+
iPhone 6+
ICloud+
Apple News+
But no, I don’t expect them to call it that.
I either expect the desktop chips to either get an entire different letter designation, like “X1” or “D1,” or they’ll literally just give you the option for duel or quad M1max and keep the name the same.
 
How is the size on the 14 compared to MBA ? I'm tempted to get onr (mainly because of the display) but wondering how big of a difference the screen makes ,like is it rly bigger ?
It's a little bigger but its just a better machine spec wise from top to bottom.
 
Promising results so far. It will be interesting to see what they have planned for the larger iMac and Mac Pro.

Rumors seem to point to pairing or quad'ing these... meaning TWO or FOUR M1 MAX or maybe M2 MAX SOCs working together.

There's also rumors of something beyond MAX: "Extreme" or similar.

And of course, "just" M2 MAX.

My guesses:
  • bigger iMac gets the very same M1 PRO and MAX options as MBpro.​
  • Mac Pro is rumored Mac Pro Jr case with DUO and QUAD M2 MAXs. Pricing: as relatively insane as Mac Pro now.​
  • Full-sized Mac Pro is deprecated because that power fits fine in a smaller case with room for extras.​
I find myself hoping for the rumored Mac Mini MAX as I think I don't want to get on the likely-accelerated obsolescence cycle and have to "retire" a fantastic screen in the new iMac because M3/4 in only a few years is given desirable software features not "able to work with" (unless hacked and then they work fine) M1/M2 chips. See how quickly A-series iPhones become "long in tooth" by the same play. Why will M-series tech be different?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
couldn't name it that Samsung would sue, they have plus locked up
My iPhone 7 Plus begs to differ.

Obviously they shouldn’t call it that though, it’s a terrible name (I don’t think they should have muddied the already inconsistent Pro and Max branding further by using them on the chips either, but that’s a separate issue).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lukkee24
I'm counting on FaceID for the higher-end models. It would make sense with the increased chassis size, even if Apple uses more powerful chips than the M1 Pro/Max (doubtful) and the cooling needs are greater (not incredibly so). If I recall correctly, the FaceID module in the iPhone 13 is at most 6.2mm thick (iPhone 13 Pro thickness - approx 20%) and the 24" M1 iMac is about 11.5mm, so I'd guess there's ample room to put FaceID there, where it does make more sense - versus in a super-thin laptop lid/screen which is used/wakes up slightly differently compared to a desktop.
Just because something is technically possible does not mean that they will do it.
It might happen eventually, but definitely not in 2022.
Expect feature parity with the new MacBook pros. So a mini LED display with 120 Hz, M1Pro/max with most likely the option for a duel M1max to get up to 128 GB of RAM like the current 27 inch iMac offers, and a Touch ID keyboard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
I felt Apple had become a bit stagnant in last few years. This however is the first thing they've done in years which blew the industry away.

Typing this on an M1 pro MBP and just the battery life alone has embarrassed every other laptop out there!
 
Apple Silicon is the single most underestimated breakthrough Apple has done. The potential computing these chips are unlocking is mind blowing.
 
I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple is already working on it. Wasn’t there a report out, Apple was working on in-house chips for the iPhones? Couple years ago?
Can’t tell if you are joking. The iPhone chips are already in-house and have been for years. The m series Mac chips are based on the a series iPhone chip. The phone will already benefit from the work on the m chips since they are in the same family.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
They’ve been designing their own phone chips since the A4 in the iPhone 4. Unless I’m missing something here.
Sort of, Apple‘s first actual full in-house CPU was the A6 in The iPhone 5, both the A4 and A5 chips were just slightly modified CPUs from Samsung.
The A6 was the first time that Apple designed everything to their own custom liking
 
They’ve been designing their own phone chips since the A4 in the iPhone 4. Unless I’m missing something here.
Can’t tell if you are joking. The iPhone chips are already in-house and have been for years. The m series Mac chips are based on the a series iPhone chip. The phone will already benefit from the work on the m chips since they are in the same family.
I thought it was TSMC that is responsible for developing the chips.

 
What an incredible year. Congratulations to all the amazing people at Apple.

It’s amazing, when one steps back, to think about the number of industries that Apple has transformed and the enormous companies which have been kicked to the curb from the hand of Apple innovation. From music to camera to telecommunications to computing to chipsets. Thank heaven Apple is so privacy and innovation focused.
 
I thought it was TSMC that is responsible for developing the chips.

TSMC is a fab. They make the chips. They also make the M1 chips, although I believe Apple had to look elsewhere to get enough manufacturing capacity for those.

Think of it the way Apple uses Foxconn to build iPhones.
 
Really looking forward to seeing what Apple does with the 27" iMac in 2022, hopefully in the first half of the year. Been aching to upgrade my '19 Intel iMac. A new design is a given, so perhaps we'll finally witness a modern, chinless iMac.
Aside from the internals, the two biggest changes I'd like to see for my next iMac are:
  1. Height adjustability: It's crazy to expect the user to adjust their position to get the right alignment.
  2. Thinner bezels/larger active display.
Honestly, the chin in the current iMac doesn't bother me a bit — I like the Apple logo.
 
Rumors seem to point to pairing or quad'ing these... meaning TWO or FOUR M1 MAX or maybe M2 MAX SOCs working together.

There's also rumors of something beyond MAX: "Extreme" or similar.

And of course, "just" M2 MAX.

My guesses:
  • bigger iMac gets the very same M1 PRO and MAX options as MBpro.​
  • Mac Pro is rumored Mac Pro Jr case with DUO and QUAD M2 MAXs. Pricing: as relatively insane as Mac Pro now.​
  • Full-sized Mac Pro is deprecated because that power fits fine in a smaller case with room for extras.​
I find myself hoping for the rumored Mac Mini MAX as I think I don't want to get on the likely-accelerated obsolescence cycle and have to "retire" a fantastic screen in the new iMac because M3/4 in only a few years is given desirable software features not "able to work with" (unless hacked and then they work fine) M1/M2 chips. See how quickly A-series iPhones become "long in tooth" by the same play. Why will M-series tech be different?
I’m not sure what you were on about, but the iPad Air2 from 2014 and the iPhone 6s from 2015 are still getting the latest software updates and run just fine. Those devices are six and seven years old respectively, and will still be getting updates into 2022 when there turning seven and eight respectively.
I don’t know about you, but eight solid years of software support without major slowdown is pretty remarkable, and about what I expect, if not even more, from the “M” series.
As for the processors you mentioned here, I pretty much agree, although I do think the 27 inch iMac would also get the duo M1max with 16 performance cores, up to 128 GB of RAM and a 64 core GPU.
My main reasoning is that the iMac 27 inch already goes up to 128 GB of RAM, and I don’t see them changing that. Also, you can shove more performance into a desktop, because you don’t really have to worry too much about battery life and such. As long as the thing doesn’t turn into a small oven then everything is good
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.