It is little bigger, I can notice it.How is the size on the 14 compared to MBA ? I'm tempted to get onr (mainly because of the display) but wondering how big of a difference the screen makes ,like is it rly bigger ?
It is little bigger, I can notice it.How is the size on the 14 compared to MBA ? I'm tempted to get onr (mainly because of the display) but wondering how big of a difference the screen makes ,like is it rly bigger ?
couldn't name it that Samsung would sue, they have plus locked upSo the Mac Pro Pro Max Plus needs to be out by this time next year for them to stick to their 2-year timeline.
Is there anything else still needing an M1 update? The big/pro iMac maybe?
I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple is already working on it. Wasn’t there a report out, Apple was working on in-house chips for the iPhones? Couple years ago?If by transition, you mean the transition of your battery life from 100% to 0% in no time.
The A series chips are already close enough, there's no need to try put a laptop chip in a phone.
I'm counting on FaceID for the higher-end models. It would make sense with the increased chassis size, even if Apple uses more powerful chips than the M1 Pro/Max (doubtful) and the cooling needs are greater (not incredibly so). If I recall correctly, the FaceID module in the iPhone 13 is at most 6.2mm thick (iPhone 13 Pro thickness - approx 20%) and the 24" M1 iMac is about 11.5mm, so I'd guess there's ample room to put FaceID there, where it does make more sense - versus in a super-thin laptop lid/screen which is used/wakes up slightly differently compared to a desktop.Chin is here to stay.
Guarantee you the 24 inch iMac is a good benchmark of what the 27 inch iMac will look like, just with black borders instead of white ones.
Maybe slap a notch on top for giggles and memes, but even that is unlikely.
Um…couldn't name it that Samsung would sue, they have plus locked up
Couldn’t be happier with my M1 Air.
They’ve been designing their own phone chips since the A4 in the iPhone 4. Unless I’m missing something here.I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple is already working on it. Wasn’t there a report out, Apple was working on in-house chips for the iPhones? Couple years ago?
It's a little bigger but its just a better machine spec wise from top to bottom.How is the size on the 14 compared to MBA ? I'm tempted to get onr (mainly because of the display) but wondering how big of a difference the screen makes ,like is it rly bigger ?
Promising results so far. It will be interesting to see what they have planned for the larger iMac and Mac Pro.
My iPhone 7 Plus begs to differ.couldn't name it that Samsung would sue, they have plus locked up
Just because something is technically possible does not mean that they will do it.I'm counting on FaceID for the higher-end models. It would make sense with the increased chassis size, even if Apple uses more powerful chips than the M1 Pro/Max (doubtful) and the cooling needs are greater (not incredibly so). If I recall correctly, the FaceID module in the iPhone 13 is at most 6.2mm thick (iPhone 13 Pro thickness - approx 20%) and the 24" M1 iMac is about 11.5mm, so I'd guess there's ample room to put FaceID there, where it does make more sense - versus in a super-thin laptop lid/screen which is used/wakes up slightly differently compared to a desktop.
Can’t tell if you are joking. The iPhone chips are already in-house and have been for years. The m series Mac chips are based on the a series iPhone chip. The phone will already benefit from the work on the m chips since they are in the same family.I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple is already working on it. Wasn’t there a report out, Apple was working on in-house chips for the iPhones? Couple years ago?
Sort of, Apple‘s first actual full in-house CPU was the A6 in The iPhone 5, both the A4 and A5 chips were just slightly modified CPUs from Samsung.They’ve been designing their own phone chips since the A4 in the iPhone 4. Unless I’m missing something here.
They’ve been designing their own phone chips since the A4 in the iPhone 4. Unless I’m missing something here.
I thought it was TSMC that is responsible for developing the chips.Can’t tell if you are joking. The iPhone chips are already in-house and have been for years. The m series Mac chips are based on the a series iPhone chip. The phone will already benefit from the work on the m chips since they are in the same family.
Gotcha, I stand corrected. Either way, the larger point I was trying to make was that they’ve already been designing their own iPhone chips for a long time now.Sort of, Apple‘s first actual full in-house silicon was the A6 in The iPhone 5, both the A4 and A5 chips were just slightly modified CPUs from Samsung
TSMC is a fab. They make the chips. They also make the M1 chips, although I believe Apple had to look elsewhere to get enough manufacturing capacity for those.I thought it was TSMC that is responsible for developing the chips.
![]()
Entire TSMC 5nm capacity booked for iPhone 12, iPad Air, and iPad Pro's A14 chip: report
This perhaps explains why Samsung is reportedly manufacturing the Snapdragon 875.www.phonearena.com
The A series are Apple's in house chips... the M1 series are just beefed up A series chips. Apple has been in house for iPhone SOC's since the A4 in 2010I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple is already working on it. Wasn’t there a report out, Apple was working on in-house chips for the iPhones? Couple years ago?
Aside from the internals, the two biggest changes I'd like to see for my next iMac are:Really looking forward to seeing what Apple does with the 27" iMac in 2022, hopefully in the first half of the year. Been aching to upgrade my '19 Intel iMac. A new design is a given, so perhaps we'll finally witness a modern, chinless iMac.
I’m not sure what you were on about, but the iPad Air2 from 2014 and the iPhone 6s from 2015 are still getting the latest software updates and run just fine. Those devices are six and seven years old respectively, and will still be getting updates into 2022 when there turning seven and eight respectively.Rumors seem to point to pairing or quad'ing these... meaning TWO or FOUR M1 MAX or maybe M2 MAX SOCs working together.
There's also rumors of something beyond MAX: "Extreme" or similar.
And of course, "just" M2 MAX.
My guesses:
I find myself hoping for the rumored Mac Mini MAX as I think I don't want to get on the likely-accelerated obsolescence cycle and have to "retire" a fantastic screen in the new iMac because M3/4 in only a few years is given desirable software features not "able to work with" (unless hacked and then they work fine) M1/M2 chips. See how quickly A-series iPhones become "long in tooth" by the same play. Why will M-series tech be different?
bigger iMac gets the very same M1 PRO and MAX options as MBpro. Mac Pro is rumored Mac Pro Jr case with DUO and QUAD M2 MAXs. Pricing: as relatively insane as Mac Pro now. Full-sized Mac Pro is deprecated because that power fits fine in a smaller case with room for extras.