iGary is looking a little limp in that graph.![]()
What is worse is that I can explain the "why" behind it all.Here's a chart showing jessica.'s post count total over time.
The first segment is shown as a long straight line because I don't have data prior to mid-2008, when she had enough posts to show up in the posting stat data.
The last segment is the extrapolation, using the posting rate she's had for the last 6 months to predict her post count 6 months from now on.
This demonstrates how my computations work for most members in the Top Poster charts. Notice that I do a linear extension of the last known data rather than using quadratics based on the change in slope over time.
Looks like iGary was working to catch up then ran out of steam.For comparison, here is a similar graph for mkrishnan, who has shown remarkable consistency, and for iGary, who accelerated, briefly passed mkrishnan in 2006, took a break from posting, and then returned.
Yep, it's a high average post count.
Just think. If it takes 2 minutes per post, it would take almost an hour an a half each day of straight posting.
Or 11 hours per week.![]()
For comparison, here is a similar graph for mkrishnan, who has shown remarkable consistency, and for iGary, who accelerated, briefly passed mkrishnan in 2006, took a break from posting, and then returned.
You can compile some of it from the previous Top 50 threads.nice
is there any way we can acess personal post data? id like to be able to make my own charts lol
I gathered all of my data from the profile pages of high-posting members. It's all public information. You can see anyone's post count as of today by looking at their profile page.nice
is there any way we can acess personal post data? id like to be able to make my own charts lol
I gathered all of my data from the profile pages of high-posting members. It's all public information. You can see anyone's post count as of today by looking at their profile page.
Getting post counts for previous dates is a lot harder. Although you can search for your own posts (or the posts of anyone else) to count them, it's pretty awkward. The forum search system doesn't let you specify a date range, so when you have thousands of posts you can't retrieve them all with a single search.
I'm doubling the prize to 131072 brownie points. Anyone up to the challenge?The only member of the Top 50 whose member number is a square: MacNut, member number 3249, the square of 57.
There are only two other members with 2500 or more posts whose member number is a square. One is mnkeybsness, member number 1764, the square of 42. A prize of 65536 brownie points goes to the first person to identify the other "square" forum member with over 2500 posts!
What can we redeem brownie points for? Get out of jail free card? S&H Green Stamps? Free fill-up with a purchase of 1700 gallons or more?I'm doubling the prize to 131072 brownie points. Anyone up to the challenge?
How do you guys get to 20k+ post count? Don't you ppl have lives?![]()
Changed members
The following members joined the Top 50 list, none making the Top 25:
DoFoT9 (#46)
It took me awhile, but I told you I could do it!![]()
There are two ways to do a little better. One is to change the "Sort Results by" setting at the bottom of the page to Ascending instead of Descending. That way you get the first 1000 instead of the last 1000 posts.Any way to search past you past 1000 posts?
Wow! How did you find him? Trying every number in sequence?
Wow! How did you find him? Trying every number in sequence?
![]()
Excel spreadsheet... copy calculated links to forum post, which I previewed, but didn't post... Command+click each link, opening each profile in a new tab... scroll through the tabs. Got milk to go with these?![]()
You have too much time on your hands.
Yeah, I totally burned up about 9 minutes! Such a waste!![]()
I was noticing you haven't been 'round as much.nice stats as always, Doctor Q! glad i'm still in the top 50. i haven't been posting as much, probably b/c of this job.