I am SO with you on this one. 2000 cds is more than $40,000 worth of music...
2K discs = $40K?
Where do you buy your music, the BMG Music Club?
I am SO with you on this one. 2000 cds is more than $40,000 worth of music...
I think this is a very bad presumption to make.I am SO with you on this one. 2000 cds is more than $40,000 worth of music, and i simply do not believe that many people legitimately own that much music.
I am SO with you on this one. 2000 cds is more than $40,000 worth of music, and i simply do not believe that many people legitimately own that much music.
You are absolutely correct mate. Apple should not have to create massive HD ipods just for this tiny amount of people - or for the people who steal music (Which is a terrible thing to do, btw)
I have about 10gb of music in iTunes, only about 7-8gb that i actually listen to more than once a year. I know movies take up a lot of room, but really, who needs 150+ movies on their ipod at any one time???
In fact I did your sister while I was transfering all those tunes into my big friggen POD!
I guess other people must have different needs than you. Otherwise, why would Apple offer a product such as this? Why? Because there are folks out there who want this capability and are willing to pay for it.I have about 10gb of music in iTunes, only about 7-8gb that i actually listen to more than once a year. I know movies take up a lot of room, but really, who needs 150+ movies on their ipod at any one time???
I guess other people must have different needs than you. Otherwise, why would Apple offer a product such as this? Why? Because there are folks out there who want this capability and are willing to pay for it.
Oooh, I like it.and if I was trudging through the tundra in Alaska I would want that solar powered iPod with 500GB of tunes to keep me warm throughout my journey.
Isn't a flashed based hdd bad? Someone was telling me they only last a certain amount of time based on the level of reading/writing data and after a period of time the byte sectors go funny???
21 - James Bond Movies
Iv just got a new Macpro and the 160Gb HDD that came with it ( upgraded from 120Gb ) is pathetic.
Pathetic? Why?
A quick sum reveals you have (very) roughly 2,000 cds. Assuming each one measures about 1cm across (a little less really), we are talking just less than 20m of shelf space. Of course you may have bought songs on itunes, in which case a cost figure would be equally alarming. The last option is illegal downloads... Apple doesn't need to keep increasing the size of its classic ipod since there are only a few people who are actually able to fill the new once with legal purchases. Otherwise they might be seen to be ecouraging illegal downloads on a huge scale.
Of course there is the arguement that people will start ripping music at a higher bit rate. But theres a limit to how much people can do that with the popularity of laptops these days and their limited space.
As soon as a bigger and reasonably cost HDD comes out i will upgrade.
No, it's just because formatting a 160 gig device only ends up with about that, even with no software on it. HD capacity numbers are given unformatted, you never end up with the full amount. My 750 gig hard drive formatted to 698 gigs, about the same 7-8% lost space.
http://www.acronis.com/enterprise/resource/tips-tricks/2004/missing-megabytes.html
Wow, I can't imagine how pissed you are about the transistor...Personally I wish magnetic drives would just die, it's like 70 yo technology they're still using. Why is it taking soo long for flash to catch up would be a better question. Toshiba offers a laptop with dual drives, but they max out at 160GB a piece, I'm not sure if anyone makes a 500GB laptop drive to swap in, seagate maxes out at 160, western digital at 250...
Well, most transistor based devices double in complexity every 18 months, but that's just an industry rate as opposed to the "law" it's sometimes called. Samsung is quite proud of doubling flash capacity every 12 months, which is astounding.Why are we still focusing on improving this technology? I mean, yes it's useful now, if they mass produced the second they got it out, but shouldn't technology that focuses on mobile devices concentrate more on enlarging more long lasting technology like flash, compact flash, and solid state? Laptops are going thin and iPods/other mp3 devices are everywhere; since people want lighter, quicker, and more space, wouldn't it make more sense to invest the R&D money into technologies that will be replacing this sort of thing?
- Kira
That's not a fair measure-- the compression is too lossy.HMMMMMMMMM, somebody somewhere must have done a study, varing for IQ, what's the human brain rated at GB wise?![]()
INot everybody utters that seemingly ubiquitous line of "I find I don't really listen to new music anymore, my ipod lets me listen to what I've had for years and that's all I really like."
LOL! That's me!
I probably have 500 ripped (lossless) discs but find myself only listening to Genesis' Three Sides Live and Duke, Pink Floyd's Animals, Steely Dan's Katy Lied and Royal Scam, and some random early Rush songs.
I can't fill up a small 1st generation Shuffle!![]()
No, it's just because formatting a 160 gig device only ends up with about that, even with no software on it. HD capacity numbers are given unformatted, you never end up with the full amount. My 750 gig hard drive formatted to 698 gigs, about the same 7-8% lost space.
http://www.acronis.com/enterprise/resource/tips-tricks/2004/missing-megabytes.html