I'd say the vast majority of iPod touch owners buy them to listen to music on, watch videos, play games, and surf the web. Most probably don't know/care what an A4 chip is, or why they would want one.
I disagree with the article, but I will say. Why not for a few $100 more get a bigger and better iPad? I mean seems silly to get a touch when for a few more $ you can get an iPad that can do so much more, not to metion screen real estate and superior internals. I get the allure of the touch, compact, small, can do just about anything great for kids, but IMO you'd be better off saving some extra and just getting an iPad.
I disagree with the article, but I will say. Why not for a few $100 more get a bigger and better iPad?
I do think it likely that the iPod touch will eventually be updated with the A5, there is no way it's getting the 4S's camera module. It wouldn't even fit without making the device considerably thicker.
It would be extremely difficult, not to mention dangerous, to attach an iPad to my handlebars. The iPod, however, fits perfectly and, due to its size, is unobtrusive and doesn't block my vision.
Ipod touch named on of the worst tech gifts
http://gizmodo.com/5865253/the-6-absolute-worst-tech-gifts-to-give-this-holiday
It would be extremely difficult, not to mention dangerous, to attach an iPad to my handlebars. The iPod, however, fits perfectly and, due to its size, is unobtrusive and doesn't block my vision.
I also find it very difficult to slip an iPad into my shirt pocket.
Just saying, when for just a few more bucks, why not get more screen real estate. If having your ipod on your bike tickles your fancy, then go for it!All I am saying is, for those 99% of people who don't care or need for it to be on their bike, it just seems silly IMO. Thats all, we all have opinions! I am glad you shared yours! Have fun!
I'll repeat what I posted earlier on this:A nano wouldn't suffice? Just saying, when for just a few more bucks, why not get more screen real estate. If having your ipod on your bike tickles your fancy, then go for it!All I am saying is, for those 99% of people who don't care or need for it to be on their bike, it just seems silly IMO. Thats all, we all have opinions! I am glad you shared yours! Have fun!
For ease of argument, let's stick with the pricing on the Apple Store. The iPod Touch starts at $199, while the iPad starts at $499. It's $300 (150%) more expensive! It is ridiculous to suggest that these would be in the same "gift" category.
What, no one should give an 8 GB iPod Touch? Okay, let's compare 32 GB models. The iPod goes for $299, while the iPad goes for $599. That's twice as much! Yes, if you're filthy stinking rich, the difference is pretty small. However, there is a huge difference between giving someone a $300 gift and giving them a $600 gift.
I disagree with the article, but I will say. Why not for a few $100 more get a bigger and better iPad? I mean seems silly to get a touch when for a few more $ you can get an iPad that can do so much more, not to metion screen real estate and superior internals. I get the allure of the touch, compact, small, can do just about anything great for kids, but IMO you'd be better off saving some extra and just getting an iPad.
And there's a better alternative, where?... The iPod Touch is amazing for what it is. You won't find anything else nearly as good. It's one of a kind. It's the perfect gift for a kid besides a smartphone.
I think the article writer doesn't know what he's talking about.