Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Cool! Hope the automatic translators from Rüssian to idiomatic US English will be up soon.

So many Sovbots; so little time.
 
What year are YOU living in? That was true for cable TV, which is one of the main reasons people "cut the cord". As soon as I see a Doritos ad on a service I'm paying for, I'm out.
Guess how many millions of people pay for Hulu, Netflix, Disney, HBO, and more with ads. Welcome to 2022.
 
Last edited:
They want people to pay and still see ads? Let's see how that goes.
The blue tick is something you pay for if It's important to you that people knoe it's you and not a fake accound (think influences, politicians etc) they don't really give a damn about ads because they never see them in their clients, esp if they are big engh to have a dedicated soial media person toio do pposts for them.
 
What are you rambling on about.

+ before these changes only certain “people” had this legitimate stature. This was unfair. As simple as that. It isn’t really hard to understand. Now anyone can be verified as a real human being. Just paying money won’t get you verified. More verified people on ANY platform is a good thing.

+ Paying 8 bucks will get your MORE features. It isn’t any different to paying for any service online. You don’t just pay to get an icon next to your name. So please stop repeating this non sense about icons.

+ why would one want to PAY to post online? I don’t know man. Why would you subscribe and pay monthly to Tweetbot? Tweetbot does exactly this. Twitter like any piece of software, isn’t a charity. You can pay to do certain things and use it for free to do others.

+ the fact that you use the word “branded people” means you don’t use Twitter and don’t really get why these changes are happening.

I think you raise fair points about broadening the feature to more people and additional services for the fee. (I didn’t make a point about paying to post, perhaps that’s from someone else?)

my point was more about the perceived positioning on the checkmark—how i think it will be perceived. i think Elon is destroying the brand of twitter, and along with it the meaning of the blue check marks. (E.g. this very morning he is doxing a former Twitter employee and spewing hatred to Faucci. I believe this will destroy the platform for many users and advertisers. There are already to social,platforms that behave this way, and they don’t go far.)

but of course, this is just speculation about the future. I don’t know. Nobody does, even you.

(p.s. you raised interesting points. Perhaps think about the tone, e.g. a 2 sentence post is most certainly not “rambling”)
 
So the guy that claims a 30% cut is "too much" has raised Twitter Blue's price by 60% on the web and 120% on the App Store...and the $3 difference between $8 and $11 is actually 37.5% not 30%.
I'd point out that Apple only permits certain pricing on their App Store. Under rules that have gone back more than a decade, prices must end in .99. Just recently, Apple made some changes for new price structures going forward that permit lower prices like $2.49, but I don't think that's implemented yet. For now, it's either $9.99 or $10.99. Even at $10.99, Apple's cut is $3.30, which reduces Twitter's cut to $7.69, less than the $8 they charge.
 
Maths doesn’t work that way. Keeping 70% of proceeds means that you need to charge ($8 / 0.7 = $11.43).

At $11 a month, Musk gets $7.70 per user (or $9.35 after the first year, if they stay around that long). Which works out to about $8 minus credit card processing fees.
Credit card processing, full support, security, Hosting, APIs and Updates are included in the 15-30%
 
This is just a money grab by Elon. Notice, he wants to charge $8 for something that cost him nothing to do, but wants to use someone else’s technology to do it for free. Not only that but he wants to use Apple’s marketing, stored credit cards, and goodwill to make money, but cut them out. Twitter can easily be a web app. They would just need to find their own customers and not rely on Apple to provide them.
 
You're not allowed to "upcharge" the 15-30% cut, the prices have to be the same outside the store, according to store rules. If he got that through a review and published, he must have something on Apple from the twitter files.
 
If he got that through a review and published, he must have something on Apple from the twitter files.

Or more likely:
It wasn't noticed in review (looks at all the copycat and scam app that made it through)
Or was deemed "2 big 2 follow the rules" also something not really new.


Still don't care bout Twitter other than all this drama being top tier entertainment.
 
Love this atitude from Musk. More people need to act in this way instead of conforming and accepting things as they are. Apple wants a 30% fee? Well it can take it from its users, not from me
Apple won’t be charging Twitter users extra, Musk will. He wants to use Apple’s Store to boost his angertainment app but doesn’t want to pay for it so he will be taxing his users to cover the cost for no extra benefit to themselves.
 
Love this atitude from Musk. More people need to act in this way instead of conforming and accepting things as they are. Apple wants a 30% fee? Well it can take it from its users, not from me

Last I checked, Elon wasn’t helping Apple Pay for development costs as a charity.

No one is entitled to free services and Apples customer base.
 
Love this atitude from Musk. More people need to act in this way instead of conforming and accepting things as they are. Apple wants a 30% fee? Well it can take it from its users, not from me
Exactly. No big deal. If you do not want to make the effort to type in some details and your credit card info on Twitter’s website, but use the convenient subscribe button in the app, you pay $3/month more. Total non-issue.
 
If I cancel my Apple One Plan, after the recent price increase I would still be $10 ahead with a Twitter account and supporting someone who cares about democracy & free speech.
 
It's outrageous that Tesla makes much more profit on each car they sell than other car manufacturers... :)

Apple should make an EV to skirt around this consumer ripoff...

(yes, we own a Tesla - but are appalled at Musk's recent decisions).
 
Love this atitude from Musk. More people need to act in this way instead of conforming and accepting things as they are. Apple wants a 30% fee? Well it can take it from its users, not from me
You do get that software was often marked up 100% or more when your only purchase option was a physical shop?

Do you remember when we queued up overnight to buy OS updates at launch? Paid...

Seriously, people need to think what they get for nothing these days.
 
Let me get this straight: you *want* governments and corporations to more tightly control the flow of information? Because someone said something problematic?

All over the world, people are making the same mistake.

- Edward Snowden
 
Like they say businesses never pay taxes. They just raise their prices to cover the increase. This is no different.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.