Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’ll pass. You can’t competently run Twitter with half of its workforce fired.
Right. It absolutely takes 7,500 ppl to run a chat room on AWS infrastructure…hard software engineering problem, especially with setting the character limits in code. I hope they didn’t hardcode the 280 character limit and used senior engineers to make it a variable 😁😁😁
 
  • Like
Reactions: GuruZac
The proof would be twitter’s terms of service and Elon’s recent tweets.

He sent one today (Nov. 5) that anyone who attempts to impersonate a public figure will have their account banned and twitter keeps the $8.

What if you try to impersonate your ex-wife to embarrass her?
 
So many people are mad that Valerie Bertinelli switched her screen name to Elon Musk and started tweeting. This didn't even cost $8 or $8 would have prevented.
Fg5JYR7UUAAhUk9.jpeg
 
casual users leave, high engagement accounts leave, credible sources leave, celebs leave, "influencers" leave, companies leave. Who is left and what makes it valuable enough to continue to justify paying $8/mo a year from now? And for how long?

it's a struggle for me because i like tweeting but my friend group is almost entirely celebs, influencers, high engagement accounts and companies. feeling so conflicted over all of this.
 
But it will be obvious they are impersonating somebody because they will need a verified payment method, billing address and name.

Is Twitter going to check that the information is correct?

Let's say my name real name is William Hansen (and its my credit card name too), will Twitter refuse if my Twitter name is Tom Jensen?
 
Are Twitter going to check that the information is correct?

Let's say my name real name is William Hansen (and its my credit card name too), will Twitter refuse if my Twitter name is Tom Jensen?

No idea and I doubt they will confirm anything beyond 'we will suspend people who violate TOS'
 
An in app purchase on Apple iOS means an Apple ID, which again has a credit card attached to it. Again, hard to do huge number of fake accounts and then the fake account attaches back to a credit card. I don't know how this would work though with Android App and payment process there though.

But how will this stop William Hansen impersonating Hank Warren? Or Maria Schroder from impersonating Ewa Dorchester?

I thought it meant "verification of identity".

Also, are you saying Apple is giving away your name to Twitter when you're using Apple's in-app purchasing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Spring
Verification sounds okay, but I always found the idea of sending a photo of my ID to Twitter very intrusive.

I once had a fake Facebook account and one day Facebook locked it and asked my for a photo of my ID to unlock it. So i used Photoshop to create a fake ID, blurred it a little to hide the imperfections and sent it to Facebook. The accepted it an unlocked my fake account.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreakingKayfabe
We are NEVER going to get to Mars if you keep delaying things Petulant Ass.....

Twitter is delaying the rollout of verification check marks to subscribers of its new $7.99 a month subscription service until after Tuesday’s midterm elections, according to an internal post viewed by The New York Times and two people with knowledge of the decision.



If you found my comment useful, you owe me 8 bucks.
 
Funny, y'all didn't mind giving the previous "world’s richest man" Jeff Bezos tons of money buying crap from amazon. Plenty poured money into the pockets of another former "world’s richest man" Billy Gates for bad software. He in turn overpaid the worst tech CEO of the 2000s Steve Balmer and made him a billionaire. He got L.A Clippers & millions of customers got Windows Vista.

The only people paying 8 bucks a month for a blue check mark are those who already have one & their lives revolve around that. Dr Seuss wrote a story about folks paying to be "special". Ironically those on twitter cancelled him.
 
If the mark changes from "a specific human being" to "a human being" it's a big change.

They should have created a new mark for this.
Why do Twitter users need a mark to show their Blue subscribers? Who cares besides Musk and the people who run Twitter’s advertising and finances?
 
The only people paying 8 bucks a month for a blue check mark are those who already have one & their lives revolve around that. Dr Seuss wrote a story about folks paying to be "special". Ironically those on twitter cancelled him.
What’s your source for this? Most blue checks I’ve seen said they’re not going to pay it. And so far Twitter hasn’t removed checkmarks from accounts who aren’t Blue subscribers. I guess it remains to be seen if news outlets like CNN or Washington Post pay for it and pay for their employees to have it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
"Priority ranking for quality content?"

How about CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER? You know, instead of blathering about how algorithms control us, and then sticking us with yet another algorithm.

"More relevant ads"? If it's an ad, it's not relevant. End of story. I'm not paying $8/mo to still be assaulted by advertisements some algorithm decides is relevant (I promise, they're not).
 
Because Elon is acting as if it's privilege to pay Twitter $8/month. And as a bone, you get half the ads. Oh and you get "priorities" over other tweets. That's pay to play.
I mean none of this is new though (minus the checkmark). Those that pay have gotten more features and priority than others. I'm no fan of Elon, but the faux outrage over this is laughable.
 
LOL, you people are hilarious... you probably spend $8 on a freakin starbucks garbage without batting an eye..
You forgot about the thousands of dollars us youths spend on avocado toast every week.

Normal people will never pay for Twitter/Facebook/etc. If someone pays for a blue check mark, that will just mean they are selling something on their socials.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Priority ranking for quality content?"

How about CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER? You know, instead of blathering about how algorithms control us, and then sticking us with yet another algorithm.

"More relevant ads"? If it's an ad, it's not relevant. End of story. I'm not paying $8/mo to still be assaulted by advertisements some algorithm decides is relevant (I promise, they're not).
Most of the weird/antisocial quirks that social media sites have developed over the years were optimizations on costs and ad revenue generation. Replies are probably sorted based on predicted profitability. The idea that people are going to run out and buy blue check marks is of course silly, but if you're going to sell them then promoting those blue checkmark posts might make some financial sense.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.