Social network X, previously known as Twitter, may soon offer more than one subscription tier. Code in the app suggests that the Premium offering could be split into three, including Premium Basic, Premium Standard, and Premium Plus.
Premium basic lists "full ads" in the For You feed, while Premium Standard says it has "half ads" in For You. Premium Plus says there will be no ads in For You. Given the specific mention of the For You feed, it sounds like all of the tiers will continue to have ads in replies. Revenue from reply ads is used for paying content creators on the social network.
At the current time, a Premium subscription is priced at $8 per month or $84 per year, and there is no word yet on what the new tiers might be priced at. There are also no other details on the differences between the plans or launch information.
Article Link:
Twitter May Be Planning to Add More Premium Tiers
I would like to take a moment to give
due credit to Tim Cook for his
courage and
leadership — in the face of some pretty powerful
social headwinds — in making the less-popular,
probably more difficult decision to
keep Apple on as an advertiser on “X”
(with the conspicuous caveat that he wants Apple CarPlay in Teslas!).
The popular,
easier, more
“socially acceptable” thing would have been to make (some sort of) political statement by joining companies that
stopped advertising on “X/Twitter” all because Elon Musk bought it,
fired a lot of useless employees,
uncensored a lot of people and
unbanned a lot of banned accounts —
erring on the side of More speech/Free speech as the remedy for offensive speech, incorrect information and
“disfavored opinions.”
(How would
MacRumors fare if they were officially penalized for being
wrong?)
People had their Tweets taken down and were put in Twitter “time out” if they simply Tweeted about how they suffered body aches after receiving their CoViD-19 vaccine shot.
Harvard and
Stanford MDs and
PhDs had their Tweets removed — and in some cases, their accounts
banned — if they wrote
true information about the pandemic or the vaccines (and on
facebook,
Mark Zuckerberg felt pressured to do the same
and now admits he feels regret for a lot of the
censorship of true information he and facebook engaged in).
It’s a thorny issue.
“Misinformation” seems to be the newest watchword to justify arbitrary
censorship.
But for many
years, I’ve seen
no restraint placed on people who express online their beliefs that the earth is flat (not a globe like some
crazy people think it is [j/k] 😆), that the moon-landing(s) were fake, that 9/11 was an inside job, that Hitler is still alive at age 134, living in Argentina with Elvis.
Should the
National Enquirer and the
Weekly World News be shut down in the name of
“misinformation”?
There was a time when I felt Tim Cook was using Apple to
wade into every political issue to come up.
Steve Jobs had
acutely strong political views, but he
always kept them out of Apple’s business.
But I guess if you
make products in the
repressive China and
sell products in the
repressive China, you have very little ground on which to take a stand as a company, on an issue like the public bathroom policy in a particular State or jurisdiction in the U.S.
Apple’s number one business is
business, not politics.