Ridiculous points? You too, another 6502a accusing me of being ridiculous? Dude, give me a break.
Let's go in reverse order, then, shall we? All companies eventually fail? No s***, La Palice/Sherlock. 🤦♂️ My point was always that Tesla is not the juggernaut Musk sells it as, or at least not while he is at the helm. Because of, not in spite of him. And I'm willing to be crucified, burned at the stake, quartered, etc. on that hill. Oh, by this point you might've guessed I'm very fond of colourful and hyperbolic language, get used to it.
I never accused you of saying over night, and I made the point of all companies eventually failing to show that the only conclusive time frame you mean about Tesla "liquidating" is near term to which I say is very stupid considering they have tons of cash on hand and very little debt to outlast every single major auto company today.
In fact, big automakers are *now* taking on large debt that Tesla took years ago because they're late in setting up production for EVs. The fact that you think these big automakers with crazy debt and little cash on hand could snap up Tesla is ridiculous.
Next, here you come again with the “maximizing profits” line;
Because I'm responding to the person that made the "maximizing profits".
I'm making the argument that other automakers charge for what Tesla gives away for free which goes against maximizing profits argument.
I'm well aware of how software features are paid for like how Apple budgets 5 years of updates for iPhones into the price of the product, but the fact is, Tesla isn't maximizing profits as they absolutely did not plan and bake the cost of every single feature I received so far into the price of the product, they aren't charging me for them, and I absolutely will get more features/software updates for at least the next 3 years. https://www.notateslaapp.com/software-updates/history/
Plenty of features were take at the requests from other owners on Twitter and Elon decided to release it for free. Not really baked into the price of my car.
As for the Model Y, I stand corrected, so thanks, but yes, it is indeed irrelevant.
I'm referring to your assertion about "Is Musk full of crap and always failing to meet deadlines and deliver on promises?" as irrelevant. No one really asked, you only posed that question to yourself.
And now that EVs are popping left and right,
Competition has been coming since 2013 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303653004579210053345661982
And those EVs popping are quickly adopting Tesla's port because they can't possibly compete against Tesla's Supercharger network. Every EV sold in USA will now add to Tesla's bottom line, whether or not Tesla built the car. So just as Tesla has been selling carbon credits to legacy automakers, Tesla is now selling energy to legacy automakers at a profit (even better when they add solar and batteries to fatten those electricity margins) 🤣
Tell me how Ford or one of the large automakers is going to eat Tesla when every single electric car they build will bring profits to Tesla.
We seem to agree that FSD is where it's at, as it's the big differentiator over the next couple of years, and if someone else comes out with it first, or with a substantially better version thereof… Teslas may very well go the way of the Newton, or Windows Phone, or whatever. Yeah, first-comers, successful in a niche and maybe even promising, whatever, but not guaranteed market leaders or even independent in the long run.
It's funny because Elon mentioned on the last call that a major OEM (likely Ford) is currently in the talks to license FSD from Tesla.
I am not saying that Tesla will necessarily collapse (my first comment in that vein was a sort of a hot take, unpopular opinion – is it, though? – kind of thing); I'm just saying that judging from a lot of worrying signs, their FSD system isn't nowhere near ready for consumption.
Again, a major OEM is in talks with Tesla to license. There are no other major automakers that even have the compute capacity to train a model. And other solutions like Waymo require expensive lidar sensors. there's a reason why Ford and Volkswagen gave upon their $4 billion acquisition self driving initiative Argo.
If CT wasn't made, it would have been a regular truck. Teams would still be busy working on a truck.And, if I must say so myself, the cool CT may actually end up being a stupid detour, something that may have distracted Tesla from their main goal of FSD.
really. And, heck, even if it doesn't detract from FSD development… it's the first piece of really innovative kit from Tesla, manufacturing-wise (and let us not forget that the earlier, more conventional models were plagued with fit and finish issues, and you certainly cannot deny those, as I've seen them with my very eyes because I've come across A LOT of Teslas parked around my neighbourhood and city at large, and their panels aren't fit any better than those on my lowly Micra were when it came out of the dealership), and it, too, seems to be chronically delayed.
Fit and finish has been pointed out for years and years and people still buy Teslas.
That alone tells me that Tesla was only truly innovative in drivetrains, batteries and, to a certain extent, infotainment and UX (all fields on which, as I've said, its competitors seem to be catching on), but those two critical delays blow apart half of the mythology around Musk, at least when it comes to cars. Guess what, that, too, reminds me of OceanGate and its stupid usage of carbon fibre and epoxy – all materials from aerospace engineering, from whence Stockton Rush came – on a deep-sea vessel; likewise, designing and building cars isn't exactly rocket science… because, duh, it's car science. And while the CT's steel/unibody construction looks interesting and promising, there seem to be some issues with it. Shouldn't it have been, then, reserved for a Gen. 2 product, much like Apple does by not jumping right ahead to a new case design (and we should appreciate how Apple's case designs shifted as much between generations as a CT does in relation to conventional chassis) during ISA or other architectural transitions, i.e. they don't try to innovate the innards and the shell at the same time? Tesla hadn't even fleshed out a complete lineup, which effectively constituted a transition from gas (or, better yet and in their case, literally nothing because they were a newcomer) to electricity, and they forged right ahead with an all-around revolutionary product (as in, completely revolutionary, inside and out) in a market segment that is far from a niche. Oh, gee, what could possibly go wrong with trying to use completely new manufacturing processes right away on a massive scale… (Spoiler: you get a glorified, very resistant and powerful vehicle that's as hard to build in scale, buy and profit from as a Trabant, that's what you get. 😂)
You've diverted away from the original topic with this paragraph...