Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
facebook to Mettttta now this to X
Its clear when you are become ashamed of your original name and what it stands for...you try to change it

Not all that comparable. Facebook is still Facebook. Meta is just branding for the business entity behind services such as Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Threads etc., just like Google didn't rebrand itself to Alphabet. And Logitech didn't rebrand itself to Logi. These brands are just business shenanigans that separate each service and their reputable brands into separate entities. Meta is the mothership behind Facebook, Instagram etc. Alphabet is the mothership behind Google Search, YouTube, Gmail etc. Logi is the mothership behind Logitech, Blue Audio etc.

In the case of Twitter, X isn't supposed to be branding for the company behind Twitter. Twitter as the service is being rebranded into X. For this to be comparable, Meta would have to re-brand services like Facebook, Instagram etc into Meta. Alphabet would have to re-brand services like Google Search, YouTube etc., into Alphabet. That is not the case.

At this point, what was the point of purchasing Twitter? If you will remove all brand recognition, fire most of the staff, remove all third-party API's and everything. Wouldn't it be smarter to start with X as a separate thing? The only thing left of value from Twitter is the dwindling userbase. Unless the plan were to remove Twitter as a competitor, if Elon had started X as it's own thing, he would have to compete with Twitter. By purchasing Twitter, running into the ground, and then re-branding it all to X, he is pretty much starting his own thing, with the biggest competitor in the space no longer existing.
 
That might make me leave. I hate name changes. So even if everything else stayed the same, I would not accept a name change. I never accepted the name changes of famous musicians for example. Prince for me was always Prince and Puff Daddy stayed Puff Daddy.

I am sure someone will develope a browser plugin though that replaces the X logo with the original logo.
 
Musk is going to loose more advertisers and sponsors over this rebranding because Twitter no longer has a well known brand name which was known world wide. The word 'tweet' has established itself in the worlds language and Musk has now ruined that with the swipe of his hand, out goes twitter and the blue bird, in comes an X.

As a brand name, Twitter is way up there with the top brand names and I am sure there was people advising Musk to keep the name because it is such a well know brand name around the world. If Musk ignored their advice then he is a fool. If he was advised to change the name then those advisors are fools and Musk still a fool for listening to them.

X will never ever be as such a strong brand name as Twitter was in my opinion.
 
Not all that comparable. Facebook is still Facebook. Meta is just branding for the business entity behind services such as Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Threads etc., just like Google didn't rebrand itself to Alphabet. And Logitech didn't rebrand itself to Logi. These brands are just business shenanigans that separate each service and their reputable brands into separate entities. Meta is the mothership behind Facebook, Instagram etc. Alphabet is the mothership behind Google Search, YouTube, Gmail etc. Logi is the mothership behind Logitech, Blue Audio etc.

In the case of Twitter, X isn't supposed to be branding for the company behind Twitter. Twitter as the service is being rebranded into X. For this to be comparable, Meta would have to re-brand services like Facebook, Instagram etc into Meta. Alphabet would have to re-brand services like Google Search, YouTube etc., into Alphabet. That is not the case.

At this point, what was the point of purchasing Twitter? If you will remove all brand recognition, fire most of the staff, remove all third-party API's and everything. Wouldn't it be smarter to start with X as a separate thing? The only thing left of value from Twitter is the dwindling userbase. Unless the plan were to remove Twitter as a competitor, if Elon had started X as it's own thing, he would have to compete with Twitter. By purchasing Twitter, running into the ground, and then re-branding it all to X, he is pretty much starting his own thing, with the biggest competitor in the space no longer existing.
He bought a userbase. Which he's hemorrhaging.
 
Looks like the X11 logo.
1920px-X11.svg.png
 
I remember the time when so many on this forum asked for Timothy Cook to be sacked and for Elon Musk to be the one to replace him. Just goes to show how most of us have no clue how to run a company. Tim Cook might be bland and unexciting, but at least he isn't completely bonkers.
Yes, Timmy is preferable to Elon, but that's not a high bar to meet. Tim and his penchant for greed and sucking pennies out of customers, along with their latest uncontrollable price hikes, is definitely not the best overall direction for Apple to take, either.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.