Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here’s a thought, maybe Apple needs to just put an end to the App Store and go back to only having their applications on the phone, which would kill over 5 billion in revenue plus few million in jobs. That would put an end to the antitrust issue.
If Apple wants an app on the phone, they will either buy it from a developer or create their own version.
 
How about “an app that contains features for which Apple charges an additional fee”.
This is actually a half way decent way to implement this bad idea. Don’t allow apps where Apple charges a fee or subscription to be loaded by default. This would leave most of the apps still on the phone and would result in increased competition where Apple is offering services.
 
What’s next, forcing you to bring your own food to a restaurant?
No, just forcing a restaurant to allow a competitor to sell their food there without the restaurant being compensated by the competitor doing so.

“Welcome to McDonald’s. Would you like a Big Mac or a Whopper? Would you like McDonald’s fries or Wendy’s fries?”
 


Apple would not be permitted to sell iPhones with its own apps installed under proposed U.S. antitrust legislation that was released last week. Representative David Cicilline confirmed the self-preferencing ban in a discussion with reporters, details of which were shared by Bloomberg.

app-store-blue-banner.jpg

Rather than pre-installed apps, Apple would have to offer other app options for consumers to download. Right now, iPhones come with a range of free Apple-designed apps from Messages and FaceTime to Calendar and Notes.

"It would be equally easy to download the other five apps as the Apple one so they're not using their market dominance to favor their own products and services," said Cicilline.

Preventing Apple from selling iPhones with its own apps installed would drastically change the iPhone's setup process, making it considerably less streamlined, more complicated, and potentially more expensive if customers were prompted to purchase or subscribe to third-party apps and services to replicate the functionality that Apple provides at no cost.

According to Cicilline, this would also apply to Amazon Prime because Amazon's ability to sell its own products over third-party products disadvantages some sellers.

U.S. House lawmakers last week debuted sweeping bipartisan antitrust legislation in the form of five different bills aimed at major tech companies like Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google. The bills would apply to businesses that have a market capitalization of $600 billion and at least 50 million monthly active users in the United States.

If passed, these bills would overhaul competition laws that have not been revisited for decades and would lead to significant changes in the tech industry. The House Judiciary Committee will review the five bills at a hearing next week.

Article Link: U.S. Antitrust Legislation Would Ban Apple From Pre-Installing Its Own Apps on iPhones

In my view this is all predictable. It happened in the past to others companies in similar position. Everytime this happens it mostly down to the company inability to adapt their competitive attitude to their current market position leading to missed bilateral communication with other businesses. Apple became a bit of an arrogant company towards other competing digital services and devs in general … This is a good attitude to have when one is a non dominant player. In such a position one is not arrogant but bold and innovative. But when one becomes a dominant player one stops being bold and becomes arrogant if not anti competitive.

Hey, I might be wrong … but it is now irrelevant. They should have relaxed App Store in app payment and selection policies some time ago. Now, even if they do, probably won’t matter. Such a shame,

Hey, but it was a an amazing, an amazing ride.
 
Last edited:
this is what happens when the show is run by old people whose technical expertise extends to sometimes logging into aol to check their mail. Can’t wait till we age out of that generation honestly
I would agree, although you could argue at that point you'll be the current generation of 'old people' and the youngsters will be saying the same about you as you fall behind the tech curve. :p
 
According to the list of “purchased” apps I’ve managed to download hundreds of apps over the years.

Out of the 28 apps on my Home Screen, 12 did not come pre-installed.

But if I had to manually install just a few more of them because of competition laws surely I would lose my mind and within days be found wandering the streets cursing how I could possibly cope without Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple Podcasts, Apple News, and Apple Fitness all offering me subscription services within seconds of booting up my brand new phone…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nightfury326
Same thing that happened with MSFT? I think and search engines back in the 00's. First time you'd launch a random list of search engines would appear and you'd choose your default. But was meant to make it more fair?

I forget the specifics so I might be off a bit but very much remember that or something really close to that being a thing.

I think it's fair to go that route. First time you launch your phone, handful of apps you can choose from or something. I'd MUCH prefer that vs another app store on the devices.
Have you ever bought a phone for your mum? We choose Apple because it just works without all the mess. Introducing mess doesn’t help anyone. If you want mess, choose a different platform.
 
I don’t live in the USA, but if possible I would raise all the people on all the fora and send one short mail to each congressman or woman, so certainly a half hour of work, with the kind suggestion this breaks user experience and adds complicated searches for each app that’s otherwise installed. Let them have the millions of mails please.
What are they thinking? If I don‘t want an iPhone, I buy an Android phone. If not that I go for a Tizen, Sailfish OS, Ubuntu, ... please can it get more more difficult???
 
What's next, not being allowed to ship your device with your OS? Should iPhones ask if you’d like android when you turn them on? Maybe surface books should offer to install Linux.

This is what happens when you mess with the free market. They should just let consumers vote with their wallets.
 
It really does sound stupid, but imagine a prompt when you first unbox your iPhone:

Which apps would you like to install?
⚫️ App Store Only (default)
🔘 All Recommended
⚫️ Select From List
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBlue1 and ohio.emt
Just to save people the time spent in coming up with another extremely asinine comparison to cars or McDonalds, ask yourself if the companies you’re making the analogy with are part of a duopoly. If the answer is no, the comparison is stupid and completely useless.

Edit: A lot of 'disagrees' but not a single statement on how I'm wrong. Quite telling.
 
Last edited:
Microsoft was almost broken up because they installed IE on Windows PCs 25 years ago. What Apple, Microsoft, and Google have gotten away with the past 15 years or so is incredibly far beyond that.

This legislation makes total sense and I support it.

Monopolies are a bad thing folks.
That is not what happened. 🤦‍♂️

They included their own browsers and forced resellers to NOT include alternatives. So it was ordered they needed to level the playing field by offering a selection of browsers at setup. The ruling was a way to fix the harm that had been done.

ETA: I'm mixing up a few different lawsuits in my head. The crux of the EU browser ballot WAS about default installed software. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/consumers/web_browsers_choice_en.html
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.