Since you insist on pressing the point, I'll do you the honor of responding, one more time.
No one has pointed to any evidence that Gorilla Glass was "this way" prior to Apple. In fact, in light of Unlink's post, we know the iPhone was the first to use Gorilla Glass, since it's predecessor is not Gorilla Glass, strictly speaking. There was no Corning Gorilla Glass in any electronic device prior to Apple. That's a fact no one has refuted as of yet. And that is the only thing I was talking about.
None of that is relevant to what I was discussing. I wasn't talking about the touch screen or the aluminium, or any other feature. Perhaps you have me mistaken with someone else.
I did not. In the post you quoted I uttered two sentences, the second was an expansion and clarification of the first, meaning the interpretation of my utterance that you chose is not a fateful rendition of what I communicated, and since the speaker is the final authority on the meaning of his utterance, to claim that I said something else is to distort my words. If that's your idea of intelligent conversation, you shouldn't expect more replies from me. Additionally, can we please get back on topic now?
Irrelevant to the context of what I was discussing. Take that up with someone else.
