Imagine if Apple refuses to replace it because it’s just “cosmetic” damage 😂
You know you have to take the watch off to charge it, don’t you? Taking the watch off is quite literally normal use.Thing is this obviously wasn’t during normal use as you weren’t even wearing it. That part of the watch would generally never be exposed when worn!
In hindsight, the watch's screen is the one advertised as durable, not the underside.After 2 weeks my watch felt on a stone ground in my bathroom. See the result. I am a little bit dissapointed. Good for me that I have Appe Care
Fortunately for that side of the watch the user’s wrist will absorb the brunt of the impact.It is the most rugged Apple Watch ever. All of the improvements are designed to make it tough enough to be worn in extreme use situations such as climbing or diving. Damage like yours would be almost impossible while the watch is on your wrist and if you did manage to do it, the broken Apple Watch would be the least of your problems.
Perhaps it’s because the thread title is not, “OMG, I dropped and broke my Ultra on the bathroom stone floor!”Good lord - why do so many people think the OP is blaming Apple? i didn't get that at all from his first post.
Perhaps it’s because the thread title is not, “OMG, I dropped and broke my Ultra on the bathroom stone floor!”
Sorry to hear that, but that's what Apple Care is for. Hope you get a swift replacement.After 2 weeks my watch felt on a stone ground in my bathroom. See the result. I am a little bit dissapointed. Good for me that I have Appe Care
What? an antiprotest post and its negative. carry on...It's your fault for trusting Apple.
You dropped it on the part that would normally be comfortably shielded by your wrist.I know. They said it is the rugged Apple Watch ever. Didn‘t know that it is not true! My fault…I dropped the watch wrong..
You know the Garmin can also be broken if dropped and if its not on the wrist....Should have bought a Garmin Fenix 7 after all!
The back glass is not sapphire glass. Only the front is and Apple implied the durability is when the watch is worn.So much about the durability claim huh.
Yes, I know glass breaks.
Apple Watch Ultra Turtle.In hindsight, the watch's screen is the one advertised as durable, not the underside.
The back glass is not sapphire glass. Only the front is and Apple implied the durability is when the watch is worn.
Read so many over the years like this…always the bathroom/bathroom sink!After 2 weeks my watch felt on a stone ground in my bathroom. See the result. I am a little bit dissapointed. Good for me that I have Appe Care
I know that it is the weakest point but as long as you have to charge it every 2-3 days and you have to put it to the charger (not like my previous Enduro 2), this „weak point“ should be also made more durable.Read so many over the years like this…always the bathroom/bathroom sink!
It would be great if you could update this thread when you get a replacement from Apple, if you do so. Thanks in advance. (I am paying $4 a month for Apple care for my watch and it’d be good to know whether the coverage includes this situation…)I know that it is the weakest point but as long as you have to charge it every 2-3 days and you have to put it to the charger (not like my previous Enduro 2), this „weak point“ should be also made more durable.
So conclusion for me:
I dropped the watch wrong (due to the fact that I didnt wear it at that point)
Nice week start together!
I will do, for now everything is working. I think I will wait a litte bit bit keep you informed!It would be great if you could update this thread when you get a replacement from Apple, if you do so. Thanks in advance. (I am paying $4 a month for Apple care for my watch and it’d be good to know whether the coverage includes this situation…)
And the back needs to be more durable than other Watches because users would be charging it while climbing the North Face of the Eiger, diving to a shipwreck, or competing in an Ironman triathlon? Oh, I get it... if we remove it on the freezing heights or frigid depths our fingers will be numb and clumsy.I know that it is the weakest point but as long as you have to charge it every 2-3 days and you have to put it to the charger (not like my previous Enduro 2), this „weak point“ should be also made more durable.
So conclusion for me:
I dropped the watch wrong (due to the fact that I didnt wear it at that point)
Nice week start together!
An alternative view is Apple could have made this part just as tough, which would have added nothing really significant to the manufacturing-price of a watch already retailing for the best part of a grand (over here in the UK), and upon which they must already be making an eye-watering markup. But instead they chose to cheap-out on this part because it's obviously the least-likely part to be damaged. That unfortunately is so Apple.And the back needs to be more durable than other Watches because users would be charging it while climbing the North Face of the Eiger, diving to a shipwreck, or competing in an Ironman triathlon? Oh, I get it... if we remove it on the freezing heights or frigid depths our fingers will be numb and clumsy.
As someone who has worn Apple Watches from the beginning, I suspect that very, very few people break that side of their Watch when attaching/removing it from the charger (or in the bathroom). Apple would certainly know this, based on its own repair statistics. So if Apple thought that the back needed extra-special strengthening to live up to the advertised toughness, they would have done it and then advertised it as an extra benefit.