An upscaled iPod would be useless. If it's not running the full OS X and can't run Pixelmator, Pages, iPhoto, etc. it's just a toy.
...
MobileMe is one link, but will need to be developed.
I can forsee a real push by Apple toward Cloud computing coming but things are still "nascent". Possibly a web-based iWork utility suite a la google docs (hopefully less annoyingly buggy) and a relaunch of iDisk.
...
Combine the Macbook Air's logic board (tiny), an Atom processor (low-power, medium performance), Unibody enclosure with maybe 1.5" thickness...
Whaaaaa? I'm sure I have no idea what they are talking about. http://upc.*************/uploads/smilies/dogeyes_s.gif...
Web user-agent identifications are easy to falsify. In fact, in many browsers users can enter whatever identifying string they would like. Similarly, resolution is a self reported statistic from the user's browser.
...
whatever they do it they need to put a FireWire port on it otherwise we won't hear anything but the moans and cries from all the people who believe they will die if they don't buy it .
Only if the site asks the browser and stores that information. Storing UA strings is likely, storing screen resolutions isn't.
Besides, it's not like the resolution is indicative of anything. My UA string tells you the browser I'm using and the OS I'm on. I could be using an external screen, have set my resolution low, or be on a hackintosh.
Karl
So you are calling the iPhone a "toy"?An upscaled iPod would be useless. If it's not running the full OS X and can't run Pixelmator, Pages, iPhoto, etc. it's just a toy.
seriously? 1.5 inches thick, that's insane!
i think Apple should just wait till they can do a netbook, that has a C2D proc. that doesn't use as much power, and a thickness of no more than .75 inches.
we all know that they can do it, the macbook air is a clear example, they just need to reduce the screen size to about 11"
of course i also think that netbooks are not crucial, and Apple can obviously survive without them.![]()
My understanding was the search engine noticed (1) a different user agent string, and (2) a different resolution. I think the combination of things is why they made note of it, and my guess would be it has happened from enough IP addresses that they found it noteworthy.
Storing screen resolution is pretty likely for most search engines looking for statistics on their users. They generally want as much information as they can get on their users, especially now that they are all involved in webmail clients and other "Web 2.0" applications.
I'm not saying it's real, or that we'll ever see an Apple tablet, but I don't think you can discount the search engine's findings when you haven't seen all the information.
I think it's fairly probable that this "upscaled iPod" will have mobile versions of Pages (iWork) and iPhoto (iLife)An upscaled iPod would be useless. If it's not running the full OS X and can't run Pixelmator, Pages, iPhoto, etc. it's just a toy.
The OLO may be fake, but might reveal a highly marketable peripheral for the iPhone. This would be interesting, and would likely work, with a little assistance from an additional internal processor to boot a fully operational OS X - A Netbook for the rest-of-us:
http://localtechwire.com/business/local_tech_wire/venture/story/3725254/
So you are calling the iPhone a "toy"?