The FireWire 400 port was removed to add another USB port. There's only one FireWire 800 port now.Question about that: does the new imac have 2 FW 800 ports? Because my previous gen 20" 2.66 has one FW 400 and one FW 800.
The FireWire 400 port was removed to add another USB port. There's only one FireWire 800 port now.Question about that: does the new imac have 2 FW 800 ports? Because my previous gen 20" 2.66 has one FW 400 and one FW 800.
This is purely an attempt to stimulate sales.
I have the same question anubis. I have the current iMac 24" 3.06GHz w/Geforce 8800 GS graphics card. Is the new chipset really that much faster?
The FireWire 400 port was removed to add another USB port. There's only one FireWire 800 port now.
Where are you getting this?That mean I can get the new mac mini and runs windos and osx, not to mention the size of the mini is 1/3rd of the smaller PC I can find at $800.
And small PC mini ATX cost $800 and over. The mac mini is way perfect for all those applications.
99.9999% sure that it performs like the Aluminium 2.0 Ghz Macbook.
Thanks (I just realized I could look that up on apple's imac page). Lose the only FW 400 and gain a 4th USB? That's not a good trade, IMO.
So much for progress!
Everybody is forgetting that there is now DDR3 memory and not DDR2 and 4 GB instead of 2GB
What are they going to update without changing the price so significantly?
The GT130 is a rebranded 9600GSO which is a rebranded 8800GS. So the GT130 will perform about the same as the old 8800GS.No. You have an nvidea chipset as well, as the 8800GS is an nvidea card. That 8800 will beat all of the nvidea cards available in the new imac lineup.
Ironically, the only card in the new imac lineup that would outperform what you have is the one non-nvidea card: the ATI 4850.
I totally agree with you, I think it sucks. If I were in the market for a new Imac right now I would be looking at the refurb store. Loosing that firewire port hurts for video production. USB is cool and all but firewire is preferable for me, USB 2.0 is so PC to me. I guess the fact that I have 8 Firewire Drives keeps me thinking this way.
I have a 24" 2.4 and I'm very happy with it and not jealous of the updates at all.
That is if Apple is using desktop cards in the iMac. We all know how that turned out...The GT130 is a rebranded 9600GSO which is a rebranded 8800GS. So the GT130 will perform about the same as the old 8800GS.
As an observation, it only costs $50 to upgrade to the HD4850 which should completely dominate the GT130/8800GS. It's a very worthwhile upgrade. I don't know why Apple even bothers offering the GT130, since the small price difference means the GT130 has little value. If they are selling it to consumers for $50, the actual cost difference to them would be even smaller, so they could have just absorbed the cost, deleted the GT130, and offset it with a simplified supply and production chain.
Personally, I'm interested in seeing how the 9400M performs against the HD2600Pro. I'm willing to bet there are cases where the dedicated nature of the HD2600Pro keeps it ahead, so the 9400M may well be a downgrade for the low-end 24" iMac.
Everybody is forgetting that there is now DDR3 memory and not DDR2 and 4 GB instead of 2GB
What are they going to update without changing the price so significantly?
The main improvement in these models was a move to an NVIDIA-based architecture with improved integrated graphics. This should improve graphics benchmarks and will also provide additional benefits when Snow Leopard is released.
Hmm, looks like a performance drop for the Imac and a bump up for the mini.
I am looking at this "update" as a clever way of dropping the price of the 2008 lineup, while apple can maintain its image of premium priced computers (maximum profit!!!) to stockholders with the "updated" models.