Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Very disappointed by lack of numeric keypad. :( I'm not going to spend another 100 bucks for the alu full size kb (that's the price in here).

This is so bad, the entire new product line.. so sad :(
 
The GT130 is a rebranded 9600GSO which is a rebranded 8800GS. So the GT130 will perform about the same as the old 8800GS.

As an observation, it only costs $50 to upgrade to the HD4850 which should completely dominate the GT130/8800GS. It's a very worthwhile upgrade. I don't know why Apple even bothers offering the GT130, since the small price difference means the GT130 has little value. If they are selling it to consumers for $50, the actual cost difference to them would be even smaller, so they could have just absorbed the cost, deleted the GT130, and offset it with a simplified supply and production chain.

Personally, I'm interested in seeing how the 9400M performs against the HD2600Pro. I'm willing to bet there are cases where the dedicated nature of the HD2600Pro keeps it ahead, so the 9400M may well be a downgrade for the low-end 24" iMac.

Yeah, if I buy an iMac, I will definitely go for HD4850. But I'd rather have an Nvidia card (I'm interested in CUDA). But I want my gaming performance! And HD4850 kicks ass when compared to GT130...

Where's GT280? ...
 
That is if Apple is using desktop cards in the iMac. We all know how that turned out...

Also the desktop GT130 is the desktop 9600GT.
I'm pretty sure the GT130 is the 9600GSO/8800GS. (http://www.techpowerup.com/80712/NVIDIA_Value_and_Mainstream_GPUs_Rebranded_Too.html) I believe the 9600GT maybe the GT140, although with nVidia you never know.

I agree that the GPUs in the iMacs are most likely mobile parts relabeled to desktop equivalents. The HD2600Pro in the previous iMac was actually the Mobility HD2600XT clocked appropriately, while the 8800GS was the 8800M GTS. It makes sense the the GT130 is the 8800GS, since it allows Apple to use the same 8800M GTS as before. The GT120 is most likely the 9600M GT from the MacBook Pro allowing better bulk purchasing. The HD4850 is probably based on the Mobility HD4870. It's probably best that Apple uses mobile parts anyways, particularly for the HD4850 since the RV770 core isn't exactly a cool customer.
 
For the future, FW800 will be it, as most new drives are adopting the new standard (that along with e-Sata).

Which Apple doesn't seem to want to adopt, either.

providing a keypadless-kb by defauly is a mistake. people aren't ready for that. the numberless one should be an option, not the other way around. Even though I use the current BT (numberpad-less) kb, I think people should still get the bigger kb by default. You might think this is crazy, but this might scare buyers away. If these are sold at big box stores, and the only one in stock is one with a "small" keyboard, some customers actually wouldn't buy it for that very reason (i've seen it happen!)

I'd never buy a desktop keyboard if it didn't have a number pad. As it is, I don't even consider a 17" MBP just because every other one on the market HAS a number pad, except for Apple's, and I like my num-pad that much...
 
Keyboard

:(

In the context of less computer value, which a lot of people post as their feeling about the iMac updates, I'm not happy with the keyboard. Regardless of people's use, it seems like a cheap move.

I don't know other peoples habits, but I use the keypad often.
 
instead of the number pad they should have added a multi-touch track pad and got rid of the mouse.

that would have seriously pushed multi-touch as the "new thing" and get software developers to really start utilizing this stuff.
 
Actually I don't think that this is a problem. Unlike the MacBooks which lost firewire completely (no 400 or 800), FW800 is backwards compatible with FW400. So you can still use your drives by just adding an adapter. It may be annoying, but you don;t lose your investment.

For the future, FW800 will be it, as most new drives are adopting the new standard (that along with e-Sata).

For me its an issue of convenience that i have gotten used to. Half my drives are FW 400 and half are 800, but I don't like to have to daisy chain them all. I actually don't even need an adapter because my FW800 drives also have 400 ports.
 
Besides the ability to have 8 gigs of DDR3 ram over 4 gigs of DDR2 ram, is there any other benefit, or just the drawback of no longer having a dedicated graphics card in the low end and midrange models?

Using Nvidia chipset allows for the removal of the Southbrigde (as it is included in the NB).
 
Boo! on the keyboard without a numpad. I hate typing numbers across the top. Ugh!

Seriously. For a laptop removing the number pad makes sense, but on your flagship desktop model this is a really bad move Apple. There are many professional uses of the Mac that you need the expedience of using a number pad for (talk to any bookkeeper for example). :(
 
No thanks

See no reason to replace my old iMac G5 until they come out with LED backlighting rather than CCFL. Agree, this looks like an interim model. Might just get a 17" MacBook Pro and use it in conjunction with the 24" LED display. Anyone using that set-up, and if so, how do you like it?
 
Seriously. For a laptop removing the number pad makes sense, but on your flagship desktop model this is a really bad move Apple. There are many professional uses of the Mac that you need the expedience of using a number pad for (talk to any bookkeeper for example). :(

I have to echo those sentiments.
 
and the cpu numbers are

Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 3.06 GHz (2 cores)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8335 2.93 GHz (2 cores)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8135 2.66 GHz (2 cores)

...

So basically, it took Apple all year to remove a processor from the lineup, replace a FW 400 port with a USB port, change the RAM type, and give it integrated graphics on the first two models *blank stare*.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)

I don't like that it comes with a keyboard without a key pad. I guess that you could always purchase one with a key pad later though.
 
Everybody is forgetting that there is now DDR3 memory and not DDR2 and 4 GB instead of 2GB

Excuse my ignorance, but what difference does DD3 memory mean in comparison with DDR2, and for the 20" entry model, would "Average Joe" need more than 4 GB anyway?

I'm trying to find out if my wife will benefit from the new (and more expensive, at least here) 20" 2.66 iMac released yesterday and the previous 2.4 GHz model. She's an "average" user who uses a computer for basic stuff like email, web browsing etc. but she wants to "invest" in a computer that'll last her many years to come.
 
The real updates...

So when does Intel ship their laptop-class Quad Core processor?

Anybody got a link to a Intel roadmap handy?

Maybe this "update" will be relatively short lived.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)

I don't like that it comes with a keyboard without a key pad. I guess that you could always purchase one with a key pad later though.

It seems that you can order the keyboard w/keypad without paying extra via Apple's online store. But that's a bummer for people buying directly from a physical store.
 
Can someone help explain to me what the advantage is of having an "nvidia chipset"?

There are two types of graphics:

- integrated (chipset directly on the motherbord)
- separate graphics card

Integrated means less powerful and especially in the case of the old mini, a chip from Intel (GMA 950) was used with abysmal performance. Nvidia and AMD/ATI, the two chip manufacturers for graphics cards, started to produce their own budget chips. As of this revision, the mini now sports an Nvidia integrated chip with much better performance (Nvidia GeForce 9400M, same as current MacBook).

Your iMac has an Nvidia graphics card that is again much faster (>2x).
 
providing a keypadless-kb by defauly is a mistake. people aren't ready for that. the numberless one should be an option, not the other way around. Even though I use the current BT (numberpad-less) kb, I think people should still get the bigger kb by default. You might think this is crazy, but this might scare buyers away. If these are sold at big box stores, and the only one in stock is one with a "small" keyboard, some customers actually wouldn't buy it for that very reason (i've seen it happen!)

Checking the online store it looks like the fullsize keyboard is no extra cost, they are listed as:
Apple Keyboard
Apple Wireless Keyboard (Add $30)
Apple Keyboard with Numeric Keypad.

The only concern I would have is the physical stores and what sort of demand they will see for mini keyboard vs full keyboard and whether the confusion will lead people to return for a full keyboard and such. Having not seen the packaging hopefully it is kind of obvious through them using different images.

Will be interesting to see how the consumer handles it, removal of floppy drives really wasn't earth shattering as in many ways their purpose was overated and other options were available.
 
Your iMac has an Nvidia graphics card that is again much faster (>2x).
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT is equal and ATI Radeon HD 2600 is better. So the arguement that Nvidia chipset is better is kind of dull.
 
There are two types of graphics:

- integrated (chipset directly on the motherbord)
- separate graphics card

Your iMac has an Nvidia graphics card that is again much faster (>2x).

What about the current and previous 20" version iMac?
Is its new NVIDIA GEforce 9400M an improvement over the previously used ATI Radeon HD 2400XT?
 
Very disappointed by lack of numeric keypad. :( I'm not going to spend another 100 bucks for the alu full size kb (that's the price in here).

This is so bad, the entire new product line.. so sad :(

Oh my god....this and the fw400 rant will go on for years.....power of ignorance....
 
Hmm, looks like a performance drop for the Imac and a bump up for the mini.

I am looking at this "update" as a clever way of dropping the price of the 2008 lineup, while apple can maintain its image of premium priced computers (maximum profit!!!) to stockholders with the "updated" models.
Except that prices went waaaaay up in most countries except the US! Have you seen what they did to us in Australia? Prices are up $500 or so!!!

no full keyboard for the desktop line? Are they nuts?

Must be. I learnt to hate compact keyboards on my Amiga 600 way back in the day.

Well, they've removed Firewire. Does that count as progress?

Yes, cause it would force me to progress from my Sony HDV Handycam to a newer model. Perhaps Apple are getting a cut from Sony. :mad:

So basically, it took Apple all year to remove a processor from the lineup, replace a FW 400 port with a USB port, change the RAM type, and give it integrated graphics on the first two models *blank stare*.

lol, well said. Magnificent work from Apple -not.

What hurts the most is that, for the first time in a long time, these updates smell of cost accounting - that kind of nickel-and-dimeing that really gets your goat. I don't mind paying the Apple premium, but when they then turn around and start saving ten bucks by shipping a compact keyboard, or by not including an Apple Remote, it just gets insulting.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.