The GT130 is a rebranded 9600GSO which is a rebranded 8800GS. So the GT130 will perform about the same as the old 8800GS.
As an observation, it only costs $50 to upgrade to the HD4850 which should completely dominate the GT130/8800GS. It's a very worthwhile upgrade. I don't know why Apple even bothers offering the GT130, since the small price difference means the GT130 has little value. If they are selling it to consumers for $50, the actual cost difference to them would be even smaller, so they could have just absorbed the cost, deleted the GT130, and offset it with a simplified supply and production chain.
Personally, I'm interested in seeing how the 9400M performs against the HD2600Pro. I'm willing to bet there are cases where the dedicated nature of the HD2600Pro keeps it ahead, so the 9400M may well be a downgrade for the low-end 24" iMac.
I'm pretty sure the GT130 is the 9600GSO/8800GS. (http://www.techpowerup.com/80712/NVIDIA_Value_and_Mainstream_GPUs_Rebranded_Too.html) I believe the 9600GT maybe the GT140, although with nVidia you never know.That is if Apple is using desktop cards in the iMac. We all know how that turned out...
Also the desktop GT130 is the desktop 9600GT.
For the future, FW800 will be it, as most new drives are adopting the new standard (that along with e-Sata).
providing a keypadless-kb by defauly is a mistake. people aren't ready for that. the numberless one should be an option, not the other way around. Even though I use the current BT (numberpad-less) kb, I think people should still get the bigger kb by default. You might think this is crazy, but this might scare buyers away. If these are sold at big box stores, and the only one in stock is one with a "small" keyboard, some customers actually wouldn't buy it for that very reason (i've seen it happen!)
Actually I don't think that this is a problem. Unlike the MacBooks which lost firewire completely (no 400 or 800), FW800 is backwards compatible with FW400. So you can still use your drives by just adding an adapter. It may be annoying, but you don;t lose your investment.
For the future, FW800 will be it, as most new drives are adopting the new standard (that along with e-Sata).
Besides the ability to have 8 gigs of DDR3 ram over 4 gigs of DDR2 ram, is there any other benefit, or just the drawback of no longer having a dedicated graphics card in the low end and midrange models?
Boo! on the keyboard without a numpad. I hate typing numbers across the top. Ugh!
Seriously. For a laptop removing the number pad makes sense, but on your flagship desktop model this is a really bad move Apple. There are many professional uses of the Mac that you need the expedience of using a number pad for (talk to any bookkeeper for example).![]()
and the cpu numbers are
Intel Core 2 Duo E8435 3.06 GHz (2 cores)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8335 2.93 GHz (2 cores)
Intel Core 2 Duo E8135 2.66 GHz (2 cores)
...
Everybody is forgetting that there is now DDR3 memory and not DDR2 and 4 GB instead of 2GB
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)
I don't like that it comes with a keyboard without a key pad. I guess that you could always purchase one with a key pad later though.
Can someone help explain to me what the advantage is of having an "nvidia chipset"?
So when does Intel ship their laptop-class Quad Core processor?
Anybody got a link to a Intel roadmap handy?
Maybe this "update" will be relatively short lived.
According to Wiki since August of last year.
providing a keypadless-kb by defauly is a mistake. people aren't ready for that. the numberless one should be an option, not the other way around. Even though I use the current BT (numberpad-less) kb, I think people should still get the bigger kb by default. You might think this is crazy, but this might scare buyers away. If these are sold at big box stores, and the only one in stock is one with a "small" keyboard, some customers actually wouldn't buy it for that very reason (i've seen it happen!)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT is equal and ATI Radeon HD 2600 is better. So the arguement that Nvidia chipset is better is kind of dull.Your iMac has an Nvidia graphics card that is again much faster (>2x).
There are two types of graphics:
- integrated (chipset directly on the motherbord)
- separate graphics card
Your iMac has an Nvidia graphics card that is again much faster (>2x).
Very disappointed by lack of numeric keypad.I'm not going to spend another 100 bucks for the alu full size kb (that's the price in here).
This is so bad, the entire new product line.. so sad![]()
Except that prices went waaaaay up in most countries except the US! Have you seen what they did to us in Australia? Prices are up $500 or so!!!Hmm, looks like a performance drop for the Imac and a bump up for the mini.
I am looking at this "update" as a clever way of dropping the price of the 2008 lineup, while apple can maintain its image of premium priced computers (maximum profit!!!) to stockholders with the "updated" models.
no full keyboard for the desktop line? Are they nuts?
Well, they've removed Firewire. Does that count as progress?
So basically, it took Apple all year to remove a processor from the lineup, replace a FW 400 port with a USB port, change the RAM type, and give it integrated graphics on the first two models *blank stare*.