Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sandpiper Air has purchased a single HP Touchpad for its fleet of one.


Not the best idea in my opinion - in an emergency I hope they have full paper back up and aren't thumbing through something electronic.

Yes because airplanes do not rely on anything electronic to fly.
 
This is complete **** ****!!!!!!! One would have to be a complete moron to navigate without the use of paper charts and as far as saving fuel you gotta be kidding me!!!!!! I wouldn't step foot on a plane if I knew they were only relying on an iPad!!!!!!

It's the year 2011. I sure as hell wouldn't get on a plane if I thought the cockpit was strewn with paper charts! (maybe a backup sextant just in case?) These are commercial airliners, not galleons!!

You do realise that the actual flight surfaces and systems are controlled by computers not wires & pulleys?!?
 
You do realize there will be no applications on these iPads that aren't approved, nor anyway to download others to them right? A Playstation 3 that only shows charts is safe because it isn't exactly showing Call of Duty in flight is it? The iPads are just a flat panel display of a chart, nothing more. It saves paper, money, and trees nothing more. If a pilot is going to goof off or be distracted it will be with a personal phone or iPad, not with these devices.

Because Apple has such a great track record of locking down iOS :rolleyes:


Yeeaaahhh....

"no applications on these iPads that aren't approved"



Where have I heard that before ? :rolleyes:


Sorry to be so sarcastic, but I just get freaked out thinking of all the dangerous possibilities
 
Because that would cost a fortune.

If your point is valid then lets put those Maps on a Playstation 3 and have the monitor bolted to the cockpit. At least then we wouldn't have a problem with battery issues.

Do you know what it takes to add a new load to the electrical system on most aircraft? Especially in the cockpit?
 
OK, I'm all for it. I think the iPad seems like a perefect tool and being "greener" is good but...

...in order to reduce the weight of pilots' bags and save fuel on flights.

Really? :confused: How much fuel can you save from 38 pounds... :rolleyes:
I mean, in 2020, they'll have saved quite a bit of fuel but right now, it sounds a bit like someone's trying to convince the bosses... ;)
 
I wonder how often pilots use the current paper charts to play paper football or shoot spitwads.
 
Because Apple has such a great track record of locking down iOS :rolleyes:


Yeeaaahhh....

"no applications on these iPads that aren't approved"



Where have I heard that before ? :rolleyes:


Sorry to be so sarcastic, but I just get freaked out thinking of all the dangerous possibilities

Again why would I try to hack the company onboard iPad to install Angry Birds when in theory I can slip out my iPhone/iPad/Android whatever that I already own from my bag and play whatever I want?
 
Forgive me if this was already asked/answered, I just skimmed thread. But does this prove that the shut off electronic devices rule is BS? Why would it be safe to have ipads on in the cockpit but not in the cabin during takeoffs or do they power theirs down at that point. (Or has the rule changed, haven't been on a plane in a few years)

The reason this rule is applied, is that in the early days of cell phones, the FAA determined that some devices would cause certain types of fire alarms to report fires when no fire was present. As such it's mostly their way of "better safe than sorry".
 
Again why would I try to hack the company onboard iPad to install Angry Birds when in theory I can slip out my iPhone/iPad/Android whatever that I already own from my bag and play whatever I want?


Maybe you wouldn't do that.

But who's to say someone won't, especially if the simple Jailbreak exploits work on this iPad as well?

Also, Who said they would be all that locked down?
 
Obviously you don't know anything about being a pilot. You can't just fly a plane straight to the runway. You much follow approach and departure charts called SIDS and STARS. If the iPad fails then the pilot will not know the restricted speeds when crossing different VOR's.

Oddly enough, you CAN actually fly a plane straight to the runway (it's called VFR). :rolleyes:
 
1)Nice pitch for Apple

2)Come on...the 38 pound reduction is another Let's Go Green crapola from yet another company. Technically, with everything else being equal (all flights are not equal), sure, saving 38 pounds must amount to some fuel savings...but you're telling me saving 38 pounds on an AIRPLANE carrying hundreds of people and thousands of pieces of luggage...all amassing to about 800,000 pounds. Lots of carry-ons weigh more than 38 pounds! Babies weigh more than 38 pounds! Different weight people on each flight...etc.

Again, nice sales pitch ra ra ra for saving the earth from paper consumption and saving that $.02 on fuel. But the real answer for UA using the ipad was all in the lets-finally-go-digital rather than the weight savings. It's all about companies, in any shape or form, reducing paper and improving business processes and efficiencies through computer use.
 
Again why would I try to hack the company onboard iPad to install Angry Birds when in theory I can slip out my iPhone/iPad/Android whatever that I already own from my bag and play whatever I want?

because pilots many of whom are ex navy/air force pilots and went to the best colleges in the US are just like basement dwelling nerds who feel the need to screw with everything electronic just to break it
 
Maybe you wouldn't do that.

But who's to say someone won't, especially if the simple Jailbreak exploits work on this iPad as well?

Also, Who said they would be all that locked down?

The Black Helicopters are overhead. I really don't know what to say.
 
This is FANTASTIC news for United's pilots...

...it's just a pity that flying United is such a PITA that I'd go out of my way to avoid it.

Now, if they gave their passengers iPads, that might be another matter.
 
Because Apple has such a great track record of locking down iOS :rolleyes:


Yeeaaahhh....

"no applications on these iPads that aren't approved"



Where have I heard that before ? :rolleyes:


Sorry to be so sarcastic, but I just get freaked out thinking of all the dangerous possibilities

What would be dangerous???? I can't think of what would be dangerous about an iPad even if they did put their own apps on there?
 
Next thing you know pilots will use remote desktop and fly the planes from their houses.
 
It's the year 2011. I sure as hell wouldn't get on a plane if I thought the cockpit was strewn with paper charts! (maybe a backup sextant just in case?) These are commercial airliners, not galleons!!

You do realise that the actual flight surfaces and systems are controlled by computers not wires & pulleys?!?

Well, with the exception of the MD-88, MD-90, B-717, DC-9 and some others - but your point is totally correct :)
 
I've got a bad feeling about this...

209lidx.jpg
 
FAR 121.306 provides guidance:



Emphasis mine. In other words, an air carrier has the authority to make the determination of what is exempt from being turned off during flight. In this case, UA has made the determination that their EFB is exempt.

So the air carrier has determined my iPad is safe to use at all times including take off and landing? I sort of knew that all along, but it's good for them to friggin' ADMIT it, and stop being an ass about it!
 
OK, I'm all for it. I think the iPad seems like a perefect tool and being "greener" is good but...



Really? :confused: How much fuel can you save from 38 pounds... :rolleyes:
I mean, in 2020, they'll have saved quite a bit of fuel but right now, it sounds a bit like someone's trying to convince the bosses... ;)

I saw a documentary on American Airlines on CNBC. You'd be amazed at home much fuel/money they saved by doing stuff like this. Its just 38 pounds for this paper/ipad switch but when you add up all the little savings they have been doing (bringing less food/ice, replacing whatever with a lighter whatever), and then multiply that by all the flights, they save millions a year.
 
So while a large plane can generate tons and tons of power (the 787 is greater than 1MW), you don't just have a 12V cigarette lighter to plug into. You will have a few accessory loads, these tend to be maxed out shortly after the plane ships. Likewise, adding new loads to the plane is a PITA.
Funny how our NYC to Paris to Dubai to Maldives flights all had 220 Volt power at the passenger seats, so you could plug in and use a laptop never mind recharging an iPad.

It seems a lot of the commenters here haven't been on a modern passenger plane lately.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.