Nope. Device is more than thick enough to easily shove a jack in. Zero effort.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Upcoming 2018 iPad Pro Could Be 5.9mm Thick With No Headphone Jack
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Nope. Device is more than thick enough to easily shove a jack in. Zero effort.
This point about the headphone jack can be debated until the cows come home. The fact is the iphone does not offer one. If you can't discuss this issue without labels then maybe one shouldn't be discussing this issue. It's highly unlikely that apple will do a 360 on the iphone, just like touch ID, it's gone.
You're describing an abuse. Removing the optical drive allows you to offer a different kind of product, as the optical drive is huge and thick. The headphone jack is not meaningfully thicker than the lightning port in the context of a phone or tablet - those devices will always have to be thicker than X on account of the nature of human hands.
So, Apple gains a small amount of space - space that already plentiful and unoccupied in the iPad. In turn, the customers lose meaningful utility. Over time, the bad will generated will harm Apple.
Why? You can always use the lighting to 3.5 dongle. If Apple replaces the lighting port with USB-C I bet you they make another dongle just for that. No worries. There’ll be a way to connect your headphones.
Yup, just carry three different dongles and you'll be able to use your headphones! No big deal! /s
It isn’t necessarily only about device thickness.
How does Apple put a 12mm deep headphone jack in a device with 6mm or 9 mm bezel?
Last edited:
The bottom line is this:
Apple can remove all the ports they want so long as they have an acceptable substitute for the functionality of the port they removed. The iPhone was one thing, and I supported the removal of the 3.5mm jack in that case.
The iPad is a totally different situation since many people use it for both gaming and audio recording -- hence the "Pro" moniker. Wireless audio is not acceptable in either of those situations. Period.
If Apple removes the headphone jack on the iPad for a key use of the device, without offering an acceptable substitute, then they are essentially acknowledging they no longer wish to support either of those activities on the iPad. Which is fine -- their company, their choice. But that is in effect what they're doing -- alienating valuable customer groups. Period.
I would argue that Bluetooth is better in the areas that matter to Apple, and Apple will likely be able to engineer away the pain points of using wireless headphones.
There is another option - rethink your workflow so as to take better advantage of the newer options available to you.
Yes, it is more work, but maybe it’s better to just embrace the change and rip the bandaid off and get it over and done with.
You don't understand the dimensions of this device. I can't explain it to you, but no one else is confused here.
[doublepost=1539396399][/doublepost]
I'm being sarcastic, dude. Get real.
People here are arguing even on this thread that making things thinner isn't a useful thing to do. Removing the optical drive didn't make computers more functional. It did make them sexier. If you can't understand that how thin it is for a portable device is a useful metric maybe invest in a Surface or something that you think is better.
The reality is Apple is saving money no matter how small by removing it and they sell devices in record amounts consistently.
If you are a pro you get the dongle to do your job. If you are a mechanic you buy some widget Mercedes sells and is only needed for that brand. However I get the impression some pros around here DJ at their friends bar and work for free beer and a chance to meet chicks.
if you're using a $1k pair of headphones while working out everyday, you're doing it wrong.
Why do you need bezels to accommodate it? How do they manage to drill in the ports on iPhone and this design if you required a bezel. Not following the logic.
I use my iPad on a daily basis. Never had a battery issue. I'd prefer a smaller battery for a lighter 12.9" iPad
But the underlying point is the same - that people adapted. In place of using CD-ROMs, people switched to cloud services to transfer their data, music streaming for entertainment, and companies adapted as well when they saw the demand for such things.
And notice how services such as Dropbox and Spotify aren’t even direct replacements for physical storage media. They are alternatives that address the same need, albeit in a different manner.
Fast forward to today, we are better off than before because of the paradigm shift (not just in technology but also on attitudes and mindsets) brought about by the removal of a key piece of technology.
I'm tired of so-callbetter options. My BT headphones run out of battery right when I need them, and I always lose track of that freaking dongle. And on a long plane flight, BT will die. Outfitting my kids with BT? No.
Anyway, that just means that this'll probably be the generation that I stop upgrading, which is fine.
The jack that the headphone plugs into is a certain height, width and depth behind that hole. Is there room for it, once the display comes so close to the device edge?
The iPhone 6S and iPads until now have had sufficiently large areas to house the jack without running into the display. That may no longer be the case, once you shrink the bezels.
We know there is depth for it as they can make depth as large as they want, bezel or not. Probably could fit in its height too, as that’s barely changed and there is some spare room on current Pads, but more likely they just don’t see need to bother with it anymore.
I use the headphone jack every time I fly. EarPods sound good for something wireless, but they don’t sound very good compared to premium wired headphones. Apple is also not making it easy for headphone cable suppliers to make premium cables compatible with lightning.