Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I do not have a good feeling about this one, it has been a long time since Apple released something good. Tim is sinking the ship!

Steve would never have allowed such a small "spec bump".

Because every release must be truly innovating right? Instead of just releasing increment speed bumps? Steve this, Steve that. Tim's doing just fine. Or perhaps you'll tell us what YOU think this release should include? What would it have that would make you think that Tim Cook is doing a good job?
 
I do not have a good feeling about this one, it has been a long time since Apple released something good. Tim is sinking the ship!

Steve would never have allowed such a small "spec bump".

Not you again.... EVERY post you make is basically trolling and saying the same thing. Or worse, shilling for Samsung. Please go away.

----------

It's 2014. All mobile screens should be Retina.

Well it's a trade off. The screen is what takes most of the battery and the current Air is 12 hours+ and the retina with a 1/3rd battery is 9 hours.
 
For me this sounds like what happened just before, or at, the release of the new rMBP's. The MBP's got a speed bump, and was left to die out. Is that what will happen to the MBA's? A new 12" rMBA and a speed bump to the MBA's that will then be left to fade and finally taken out of production?

Only difference from the MBP move, is that the form factor of the MBA's is near perfect, and a huge improvement over the old MB's and MBP's. So would they let them die out? The Bezel tells me yes, its too "2007ish".

Not sure. I'd love a new MBA, but if its only a slight speedbump, and no retina and no redesign, I'm gonna wait for the rumored 12" rMBA.

If this speedbump happens prior to WWDC in June, it tells me that, they are making room for an rMBA announcement there.

A new 12" rMBA at WWDC in June, and upgrades for the rMBP's in october/november is my hopeful guess.
 
Last edited:
The mini is great because you can do so many different things with it:

1. Home Theater PC
2. Web Server
3. Easy upgrades and repairs
4. Resell at a high value

It's also a perfect fit for anyone who already has (or wants) a monitor, keyboard, or mouse of their own choosing. And on top of all that, it's cheap!

Cool, thanks for clearing that out. Btw, aren't they underpowered compare to iMacs?
 
Did anyone notice that 11.6 in (current smaller Air) and 11.88 in (rumored new MacBook) are virtually the same screen size?
 
Cool, thanks for clearing that out. Btw, aren't they underpowered compare to iMacs?

to some extent.

The CPU's in the current Mac Mini's are on par with the CPU's in the 2011 Macbook Airs (era).

You just get them clocked at a higher speed to cope with larger dimensions and better heat dissapation.

still capable machines by todays standards and good enough for everyday usage.

Compared to iMac's, yes, they are less powerful. An iMac today, not only uses desktop class CPU's, but are more recently updated to be better and more efficient.

Again, the problem is, the iMac is the only desktop class computer apple sells.
 
My white plastic MacBook has soldiered on, but I've been waiting for an update to upgrade. I think this might be the time. Not sure if I want to wait for a new MBP or not.
 
The small update is still worthless if it's not retina.

If it's retina, it's a big update.

No reason to not bump the specs if it's advantageous to production (easier/cheaper to get better parts) or sales (don't fall behind small improvements in the competition).

Only worthless if you've got a completely adequate 2013 MBA. If buying new, you'd rather have the better device at the same price.
 
to some extent.

The CPU's in the current Mac Mini's are on par with the CPU's in the 2011 Macbook Airs (era).

You just get them clocked at a higher speed to cope with larger dimensions and better heat dissapation.

still capable machines by todays standards and good enough for everyday usage.

Compared to iMac's, yes, they are less powerful. An iMac today, not only uses desktop class CPU's, but are more recently updated to be better and more efficient.

Again, the problem is, the iMac is the only desktop class computer apple sells.

The current mini CPU is ivy bridge, equivalent to the 2012 MBP in either dual or quad core. The low voltage MBA CPU has never been used in a Mac mini.
 
The current mini CPU is ivy bridge, equivalent to the 2012 MBP in either dual or quad core. The low voltage MBA CPU has never been used in a Mac mini.

my bad, i thought it was still on Sandybridge.

it is still the Low voltage part

NOT the ultra low voltage part.

similar architectures between the ULV and the LV. just genreally different clockspeeds to match the thermal requirements defined by each.

The LV and ULV are still not desktop class.

the default configuration CPU uses the
i5-3210M -35w @ 2.5ghz configuration
the Macbook air uses the i5-3427U - 17w @ 1.8ghz (25w @ 2.3)

so yeah, its the same one in the Macbook pro.

capable CPU no doubt. still not desktop class
 
Last edited:
It seems strange to announce a spec bump this close to WWDC, so I'm skeptical.

Very much agreed on the long-overdue Mac Mini refresh. I've been holding off on replacing my late 2010 since last July. The whole point of my going from the iMac to the mini was that this way I wouldn't be throwing away a perfectly good screen when I replace the computer. If only Apple would help me put this in practice by unleashing the new mini!
 
That seems to be the conventional wisdom... just before Apple goes and shows up with a new, improved model.

I hope that is true now as its been in the past.

Agreed. I'm hoping for a new mini that is an iMac without the screen.

Sigh, one can dream, right?
 
Nothing really of interest coming this year for me. My 13" (mid'12) i7 MBpro with 240GB SSD still works beyond my expectations. Maybe in another 2-4 years. If I travelled more I would definitely snap the air up, and not even think twice about it. :)
 
Just curious, but what's so awesome about fanless? If it's about noise, you hardly ever hear the fan on a modern Macbook/pro anyway. Definitely not unless it's being stressed. When you do hear the fan, it's reassuring to know the fan is doing its job. With fanless we might encounter throttling or greater heat issues, especially in earlier revisions.

More space
Thinner
The fan is the last moving part in a modern laptop, it'd be cool to have no moving parts at all.
 
Keyboard with keypad?

When will Apple add a keypad to their notebooks? Other manufacturers have it, and there looks to be plenty of space for Apple to do it. When you're dealing with numbers all day (CPA), we want full-service keyboard without having to plug in any external components that hang off the unit.

Please Apple, add a keypad to your keyboards! It's been long enough!
 
When will Apple add a keypad to their notebooks? Other manufacturers have it, and there looks to be plenty of space for Apple to do it. When you're dealing with numbers all day (CPA), we want full-service keyboard without having to plug in any external components that hang off the unit.

Please Apple, add a keypad to your keyboards! It's been long enough!

Unfortunately, you represent a small minority. I would not want a keypad on my laptop. I do actually have the wired Mac keyboard with the keypad for my Hackintosh that I like, but when I get on my wife's PC laptop with extra keys they just get in the way.

I'm afraid you're looking at a USB keypad.
 
[While it is unclear how a 12-inch Retina MacBook Air would fit into the current lineup, analyst Daniel Matte argued that the laptop will be exactly 11.88'' in diagonal screen size, allowing Apple to offer a Retina Display (2732 x 1536, twice 1366x768) with the exact same PPI as the iPad Air (264 PPI).

Daniel Matte is an idiot. First of all, existing 11" MBA has 11.6" screen (60.5 square inches)), so 11.9" screen (63.4 square inches) would be minuscule increase at best.

Secondly, both 13" and 15" retina MBPs have different pixel density (227 and 237 pixels per inch, respectively), neither of which have same density as iPad Air (264 pixels per inch). In other words, pixel densities do not need to be the same across products, especially when it comes to Macs.

13" MBA has 13.3" screen (13.3" or 79.5 square inches). And with PC makers offering 12.5" screen (70.2 square inches) on their ultraportable notebooks, Apple would be wise to adopt a similar screen size that measures at least half way between existing 11" and 13" MBAs.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.