Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
See my photo icon? That's a special edition JLPGA PowerBook 170. There are PowerBook 170's out there that are working flawlessly 25 years later. Apple doesn't make 'em like they used to...but I have to say that other than a graphics card malfunction and replacement on my 2011 27" iMac, the machine has been flawless. I am worried about this MacBook Pro thing though...This isn't acceptable for a $2500 - $4000 machine in 2016, and frankly is brings back memories of the PowerBook 5300 fiasco of 1995-1996 that required logic board replacements. I am holding off on this new MacBook Pro until I can be guaranteed of a problem-free product.
 
Why in the hell can Apple go no more than two or three years without major graphics card problems?! So far, my 2014 MBP has not had problems (knock on wood) but my 2008 and 2011 MBPs both had problems.
 
Apple has become a boutique computer company. If you value thinner, lighter and the way a system looks and are fine if that limits how powerful the system can be, if you don't value repairability and upgradability and are fine if all of that makes the system more expensive then the MacBook Pro line is for you.

The problem is that there was already a line of laptops like that at Apple. They were MacBook Air's. I don't mind Apple having a line like that. The problem is that they are completely alienating a large base of users who want a line that isn't as thin, isn't as light and doesn't look as good but as a result has user replaceable and upgradable parts, has a GPU that isn't a joke, has a larger battery and as a result allows for more memory if they want it.

Well Apple just told those people where they can stick it and I'm not sure why. They can have both kinds of laptops. A line like that would sell. I was somebody who switched from Windows and didn't mind the "Apple Tax" because I loved OS X and the idea of a machine that "just works". It seems that I'll be switching back to Windows.
 
I wonder what the actual rate of failure is. (Reading the comments you'd think it was like 95% or something.)

WTF is up with dGPUs on MBPs? They've been an issue for... well... way too long.

As for the 13s... all I can say is mine isn't having and hasn't had any issues. Here's to hoping I'm not part of a future recall program. Erg.

The issue is: Apple pushes the boundaries of thinness unnecessarily (who was complaining about how 'fat' the 2015 mbp's were?) and that thinness leads to thermal issues.

The insides cook, and this is what the result is.
 
Last edited:
Lol what? What superior Pascal cards? the 70W ones or the 140W ones?

The only people more delusional than Apple drones are NVidiots.

Radeon Pro actually competes pretty well against Pascal in terms of perf/watt. It's simply that Apple uses a 35W GPU. Of course, if this was a similar performing nvidia chip, everyone would be singing praise because nvidia.

Also people conveniently forget about the GPU repair program for the 2012/Early 2013 MacBooks with the GT 650M.
 
Last edited:
I'm not an apologist. But I also refuse to jump on the 'hate everything Apple does because Tim Cook...' bandwagon.

Apple is still an incredible company making the very best products. A fact underlined by the fact there are huge waiting lists for the new MacBook Pros, iPhones are still on 2-3 week waits for shipments, etc. Apple cannot make their products quickly enough to fulfil demand. This is not evidence of a company in trouble.

You start by saying you're not an apologist. Then proceed to claim Apple makes good stuff since a lot of people buy it. Mich light gets a lot of beer sales. Doesn't make it a good beer.

And by the way, at this rate it won't be long before the general population catches on to the crap Apple is putting out, and soon you won't even be able to make your claims about their 'strong' sales.
 
This looks like either an overheating issue or graphics driver issue.
Hopefully it is the latter so that they fix it ASAP for those people who bought them and are experiencing it.
Good luck fellow geeks.
 
Mine was very glitchy, lots of lag while scrolling, poor performance doing anything, continual crashing and rebooting and the final straw was the 2 hour battery life!

I went back to my 2013 MacBook Air after 2 days to find it was actually faster and lasted 6-7 hours on a charge.

So mine went back to Apple. In the UK I'd paid £3329 for a 2016 laptop which in day to day usage (Xcode, Safari, Photoshop) was slower and had worse battery life than a 2013 laptop I paid £1500 for.

Apples quality control really has gone out of the window both with hardware and software, either that or this never ending desire to make thinner products is getting out of hand!
 
Glad I went with the 13". Never really liked dedicated GPUs in laptops. Not only does it drain the battery and generates too much heat and you have issues like this.

Is this something a software update can fix or is it a flaw in hardware design?

As someone who owns a 13" Late 2013 rMBP, I always regretted my configuration/pick because it DID have an integrated GPU.

Here I am at just under theee years of ownership and it's laggy as all hell when performing system animations, it can't properly support 4K at 60hz and has no support for 10-bit color. I bought the 2nd most powerful model and then maxed it out.
 
freak.gif


It was just a loop in real life...
 
That's why I don't buy first gen. Bad car analogy: not buying a car where the water pump goes bad at 30k.
:cough: my A4 :cough:

This whole 'first gen' thing makes no sense. Is last years corvette 'first gen' since they changed the body style a bit?!?
Apple has been making MacBook pros and 'pro' laptops,for decades now. There's no 'first gen' about it - by now they should be able to redesign a product without it sucking.
 
As someone who owns a 13" Late 2013 rMBP, I always regretted my configuration/pick because it DID have an integrated GPU.

Here I am at just under theee years of ownership and it's laggy as all hell when performing system animations, it can't properly support 4K at 60hz and has no support for 10-bit color. I bought the 2nd most powerful model and then maxed it out.

10 bit color makes absolutely no difference unless you have support in both other software and whatever display you use. Apple ignored it forever, so it was hardly a reasonable consideration for you unless you were willing to go the Windows box route (including an appropriate display). Did the 750m fare any better? Keep in mind the macbook pros with discrete graphics rely on switching, so they may not be enabled when system animations run.
 
Apple has become a boutique computer company. If you value thinner, lighter and the way a system looks and are fine if that limits how powerful the system can be, if you don't value repairability and upgradability and are fine if all of that makes the system more expensive then the MacBook Pro line is for you.

The problem is that there was already a line of laptops like that at Apple. They were MacBook Air's. I don't mind Apple having a line like that. The problem is that they are completely alienating a large base of users who want a line that isn't as thin, isn't as light and doesn't look as good but as a result has user replaceable and upgradable parts, has a GPU that isn't a joke, has a larger battery and as a result allows for more memory if they want it.

Well Apple just told those people where they can stick it and I'm not sure why. They can have both kinds of laptops. A line like that would sell. I was somebody who switched from Windows and didn't mind the "Apple Tax" because I loved OS X and the idea of a machine that "just works". It seems that I'll be switching back to Windows.

+1000
 
Maybe not today, but if one steps back a little and really looks at what is going on with Apple, one can see the tsunami starting to form.

The seeds were planted a decade or more ago, with their few-massive-eggs-in-one-basket product model.
 
Wait? Apple not sufficiently cooling a system? *GASP* Never!

Seriously, this really, really, really, really isn't rocket science. If they can't get their damn GPUs cooled properly after all this time they then need to fire every single person in their clearly sub-standard engineering teams.

For those that don't know, this has been a problem, in computing-years, "forever", with Apple products. They have had to issue extended repair programs for system after system after system, but they just can't learn. They even managed to release full-size towers with overheating GPUs. Really. In a full-blown tower. That's mind-bogglingly idiotic. My 2006 MacPro shipped with one of those, which they replaced with another one that did the same thing a year later. I've had all "hacked" PC cards in it from then on with zero problems. It's like every GPU Apple touches overheats because the morons just refuse to design-in sufficient cooling. I have a little Mac Mini file-server also, and guess what it does if you try to use the GPU? Yep, it locks-up after about 10 minutes. It can sit there all day and serve files. I can peg the CPU all day long in HandBrake too. But 10 minutes(or less) of YouTube, or Netflix, or anything that hits the GPU? Graphics artifacts followed by a full lock-up.

It's simply absurd. And inexcusable.

(And no, it's not just AMD GPUs. Mac Mini is a nVidia GPU. My home-built PC mini-tower for stereoscopic gaming runs an AMD GPU also. I can, and do, peg that GPU at 100% for hours on end and it never, ever, overheats. This is a problem specific to GPUs that Apple touches...)
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.