Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I kept reading about Verizon customers WANTING/NEEDING the iphone on VZN network so they could buy an iPhone or jump ship from ATT.

I know ATT has said their Trade-in Sale was very popular and they've been selling lots of phones.
 
If this is true, Verizon should be to blame. Every time you go to a Verizon store the sales people are never pushing the iPhone. If you ask about the iPhone, they immediately try to get you to buy a different phone. Their sales reps are obviously incentivized to sale other phones, not iPhones.


very true, I went in looking for info on my first iphone (5) and whole sales team told me how terrible the battery life was, to get a moto droid etc.


battery life on the 5 isnt even bad.
 
And the geniuses keep training to push their employees to sell non iPhones....

Wasn't Verizon one of the carriers offering its sales folks bigger incentives to sell anything but the iPhone, such that these folks started steering even iphone intenders to other brands?

Kinda schizophrenic if you ask me.

If this is true, Verizon should be to blame. Every time you go to a Verizon store the sales people are never pushing the iPhone. If you ask about the iPhone, they immediately try to get you to buy a different phone. Their sales reps are obviously incentivized to sale other phones, not iPhones.

I can speak for three states. I have never seen an iPhone on display in a Verizon store. Occasionally an iPad.

Just shows that there are many more options for consumers and they are taking advantage of some of the other devices. Apple needs to refresh the iPhone more often IMO.

Not finding that to be the case. Thinking it has to do with the Verizon practices of selling.

To note: The NHL premium during the playoffs? Verizon was big pushing that it was free for their 4G LTE smartphone customers and tablet customers.

But... "4G LTE smartphones with the exception of the iPhone 5" was the reality.

Verizon STILL treats the iPhone, one of, if not the, best selling handsets in their history, as a second class citizen.

As a company, if your product can't sell in my store, I shouldn't be held liable. Now if I'm purposely not selling or prohibiting sales of it, then I have no case.

It seems what Verizon is doing is preventing sales of the iPhone, so Apple should push to get the money.

However, I feel Verizon may just drop the iPhone completely. Heck, I'd even disable any off-contract iPhones on the network too. Yeah it may piss off customers, but it'll make Apple give in too.

How dare they sell anything other than Apple products. Heathens.

----------



My android VZW phones could do that, my VZW iPhone 5, however, cannot.

There's lots of anecdotal evidence out there that Verizon had employees push consumers to other phones. I've read several stories where someone came in to Verizon specifically for the iPhone and the sales rep tried to steer them to another phone.

I'm sure the carriers hate Apple because they have very little control. Can't put their stupid logo on the hardware or install bloatware on the device. And they have no control over software updates.

Exactly this. Have friends that work for VZW, even one as a branch manager and they are trained try to steer most of their prospective handset purchasers towards non-iOS units, like Android or Window, because of higher commissions/payouts.

They take the short-term commissions gains, but end up with burden of a higher profit loss to Apple, for their short-sightedness.

Personally, I wish VZW (which I have as my provider) employees would actually listen to what the customer's needs are, not whatever the shareholder's whims are.
 
This is simply a matter of Verizon's point-of-sale tactics catching up to them. They pay their salesmen low wages, and hinge their real, commision-based income (and continued employment) on selling devices with high profit margins. Whether it's some junk feature phone, or the Android du jour, they run a vicious, no-holds-barred sales environment that is aimed at maximizing margins, rather than selling the customer the device that best suits their needs. As it turns out, the iPhone is one of their least profitable devices, and employees get in trouble or are outright terminated if they sell too many of them. That's the real reason Android has a greater market share in the US, and it's the reason Verizon finds themselves in the position that they are currently in. Apple was smart to put that term in place - it is the only thing that protects them from backwards point of sale systems like the one Verizon employs.


This has been my experience at Verizon Wireless corporate kiosks in shopping malls. I gravitate toward iPhone. Sales reps ALWAYS talk the iPhone down and go on and on about the wonders of Android anything.

Several have told me that iPhone screen is too small and try to steer me to a huge thing I cannot even hold comfortably.

Please understand this is just a happenstance slowing down in a mall. I am not in the market for a phone. I am a VZW customer with two feature phones out of agreement. If I let them actually look up my account they would probably follow me home with a boatload of handsets I don't want.

Apple approached VZW first with iPhone. VZW execs showed SJ the door. ATT was second choice. VZW would not offer iPhone without compelling customer demand. And yes, they definitely penalize reps for activating iPhones.

Cook should make them pay up. I doubt he will unfortunately.
 
Anyone else expecting to see a huge iPhone advertising push from Verizon?

anything at all would be a step up. even if you go in to a verizon store begging for an iPhone, they will push back hard with the droid razr.
 
And this alone could cause a 22% decline in Apple's income? I doubt it. I think it's more to do with the iPhone's faultering attractiveness.

Where is this 22% decline you speak of? When did Apple report it? :confused:
 
Didn't the iPhone first come to Verizon in June of 2011? I be a bunch of iPhone 4 users are just waiting until the 5S comes out to upgrade.
 
Verizon's got it coming to them - 24 month upgrade wait... I was two weeks away from making the cut off! They could have more upgrades if they make the wait only 20 months...
 
hahaha! I know several people that went to Verizon to buy an iPhone and came out with a Galaxy because the salesperson told them it was a far superior phone and these people didn't know any better. Maybe Verizon should tell their employees to let people who want to buy an iPhone do just that with no questions asked.

"Didn't know any better"?

If they wanted an iPhone, it shouldn't matter what a salesperson says. Maybe they "didn't know any better" on why they wanted an iPhone in the first place. :eek:
 
Reaping what they sow.

My friends switched from AT&T (iPhone 3GS) to some free Android phone on Verizon. After the contract, they tried to get the free iPhone from Verizon.

The Verizon rep told them there's no such thing as a free iPhone - or a cheap one for existing customers for that matter. There are plenty of free/low-cost Samsungs instead... :eek:

He took a pass, but her phone was really bad so she got some Samsung (not happy with that either).

"Didn't know any better"?

If they wanted an iPhone, it shouldn't matter what a salesperson says. Maybe they "didn't know any better" on why they wanted an iPhone in the first place. :eek:
 
As a company, if your product can't sell in my store, I shouldn't be held liable. Now if I'm purposely not selling or prohibiting sales of it, then I have no case.

It seems what Verizon is doing is preventing sales of the iPhone, so Apple should push to get the money.

However, I feel Verizon may just drop the iPhone completely. Heck, I'd even disable any off-contract iPhones on the network too. Yeah it may piss off customers, but it'll make Apple give in too.

If they did that, I would ride my contract out and immediately leave the network. It's not good enough to make up for how much that would piss me off. I'm sure many other people agree. We were patient enough to wait until the iPhone came, because we knew we'd be the first non-AT&T network to get it. Now that every network has it (with US Cellular coming this year), I have no reason to stay with a carrier who is so childish as to drop a device because they couldn't meet the terms they agreed to.

T Mobile will be the carrier I go to if I leave VZW, assuming this nationwide LTE roll-out goes according to their claims.
 
"Didn't know any better"?

If they wanted an iPhone, it shouldn't matter what a salesperson says. Maybe they "didn't know any better" on why they wanted an iPhone in the first place. :eek:

Not everyone is some tech geek. I have plenty of family/friends that could easily be swayed if the salesperson tried to talk them in to something else. I never found this to be the case with AT&T. When I had a crap HTC phone that wasn't working the salesperson talked me in to getting an iPhone.
 
Commissioned Sales

Verizon's problem is twofold. 1. The corporate commitment to Apple was, at best, a gross over estimation of their sales projections. 2. If their sales force is commissioned, there is no incentive for the sales people to push iPhones. If I am a VZ sales person and the ability to pay my bills is directly tied to the amount of profit I generate, I am going to push the most profitable items. THAT has nothing to do with a like or dislike of Apple. That's just the pure economics of sales. Maybe if Verizon paid their people a flat salary or hourly wage + a per unit bonus (regardless of brand) instead of commission the sales person would be less inclined to push something other than the iPhone. I am not sure what will work but as it stands now, Verizon seems pretty screwed.

Hypothetical sales person gets paid X% of every phone they sell.
The hypothetical payout breaks down like this:
$8 for every HTC One
$7.50 for every Samsung S4
$9.45 for every BB
$5 for every feature phone - not sure why they still sell these.
$4 for every iPhone

If rent/mortgage, gas, cable, car payment, etc. depended on the numbers above, what would any of us sell?
 
Verizon's problem is twofold. 1. The corporate commitment to Apple was, at best, a gross over estimation of their sales projections. 2. If their sales force is commissioned, there is no incentive for the sales people to push iPhones. If I am a VZ sales person and the ability to pay my bills is directly tied to the amount of profit I generate, I am going to push the most profitable items. THAT has nothing to do with a like or dislike of Apple. That's just the pure economics of sales. Maybe if Verizon paid their people a flat salary or hourly wage + a per unit bonus (regardless of brand) instead of commission the sales person would be less inclined to push something other than the iPhone. I am not sure what will work but as it stands now, Verizon seems pretty screwed.

Hypothetical sales person gets paid X% of every phone they sell.
The hypothetical payout breaks down like this:
$8 for every HTC One
$7.50 for every Samsung S4
$9.45 for every BB
$5 for every feature phone - not sure why they still sell these.
$4 for every iPhone

If rent/mortgage, gas, cable, car payment, etc. depended on the numbers above, what would any of us sell?

And Verizon makes less profit on the iPhone than their other phones to boot.
 
That's what I was thinking too!

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. If Verizon can't control their greed, then you can imagine they'll keep the iPhone prices inflated as high as possible, hoping to cut their losses that way (and perhaps gambling on future iPhone releases being popular enough to boost their sales back into the zone they projected).

If, however, they want to play a smarter game, I could easily see them giving away iPhones free (or for a penny or something, if some contract detail says they can't just GIVE them away) to hook new customers into contracts -- thereby cheapening the perceived value of the iPhone (and angering Apple, who clearly stated in the past they never want to see that happen to their product).

That way, the money they lose could be considered more of a gamble on advertising/marketing, and trying to buy leverage with Apple. "Take away our minimum sales obligation and we'll stop selling your phones way below cost."


They might as well offer deep discounts on the iPhones if they are going to loose that much money. I'm sure Verizon would prefer to give the money to their customers rather than to Apple.

And Apple may not like the deep discounts on their flagship product so Verizon may be able to extract some concessions from Apple
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.