Actually, the iPhone 5 is not for him on Verizon. He should get the Samsung Galaxy S III instead, which works like he wants on Verizon.Then CDMA is not the network for you. Move on and choose AT&T.
Actually, the iPhone 5 is not for him on Verizon. He should get the Samsung Galaxy S III instead, which works like he wants on Verizon.Then CDMA is not the network for you. Move on and choose AT&T.
Well, I dont think I could put the blame on either. Verizon has LTE phones that support voice+data and it would obviously not be in their best interest to switch to VoLTE just to cater to one phone, even if it is the iPhone 5. Same goes for Apple. They have carriers all over the globe, they do not need to add an antenna just for Verizon and Sprint. It goes both ways, but I'm still bummed about this.
My 2 cents...
For the first time in my life I've been considering Samsung Galaxy S3, which is unbelievable for me.
Actually, the iPhone 5 is not for him on Verizon. He should get the Samsung Galaxy S III instead, which works like he wants on Verizon.
Then CDMA is not the network for you. Move on and choose AT&T.
It's a function of the size of the phone. The S3 is as big as a pancake. It should have decent battery life.
I have had 4 droids including the Galaxy S3. All were returned.
I'm more happy using an iPhone 3GS right now, even tho the pictures look like ass compared to the S3 and the screen is much lower res. I'll be getting an iPhone 5.![]()
It's in everyone's interest to switch to VoLTE eventually, since the longer the delay, the longer it will be before 3G networks can be turned off and their spectrum refarmed. Heck, 2G shutdowns are just now starting.
It's not as big as a pancake. Let's not talk hyperbole. And a bigger screen NOT LTE necessitates the larger battery capacity.
Plus - if you have the room - why NOT have a bigger battery.
You can't dismiss his points when someone clearly asked WHY someone would need both. He was responding to that question. He didn't judge.
It's not as big as a pancake. Let's not talk hyperbole. And a bigger screen NOT LTE necessitates the larger battery capacity.
Plus - if you have the room - why NOT have a bigger battery.
It uses two radios and two antennas. It takes a toll on battery life. Verizon could address this by implementing VoLTE, which would benefit everyone using an LTE phone, including you, since it would shut off the CDMA radio entirely. They could also implement CDMA Rev B, which supports SVDO over CDMA.
It's a curious decision by Apple, to be sure, but I can understand the technical reasons for making that design choice (Apple wants to use a single more advanced chip than two less advanced chips to save space and battery life).
Anyway, I'm on AT&T, so I don't really care as I could do this years ago.
Well I know its in the works and I hear it will be rolling out sometime next year. These transitions always take forever.
Then CDMA is not the network for you. Move on and choose AT&T.
Your solution is farcical. Bulky plastic phone? Which model are you referring to - the many that are even thinner than the iPhone 5?
Crappy LTE battery life? I don't know - I own an iPhone 4 and Samsung Skyrocket (with LTE) - both on ATT - and both have the same battery life with similar usage.
Posting your nonsense doesn't make it true. It just makes you seem uneducated about the industry.
You could not be more wrong, there is no way Apple would let verizion dictate to them to put a third antenna in the phone. Face it, cdma is old tech, wait a couple of years and you will be able to do both on verizion.
![]()
It's pretty big - at least as big as a "silver dollar" pancake. The LTE and the bigger screen necessitated the bigger battery. Remember that the S3 uses an older LTE chip (like the new iPad). It uses up more battery since it's a 45nm design vs. a 32nm design. It's just like how the 2012 MacBook Air gets better actual battery life than the 2011 even though both have the same battery and screen.
I don't disagree that making most of the room inside makes sense. However, it was Samsung's decision to make a phone that big, and Apple's to make a phone that's much smaller.
I'm likely going to stick with the "Death Star" for now, though I'm eying T-Mobile once they get LTE over AWS. I'm off contract and am hoping they make the no-commitment version available from AT&T. I can unlock it later, but I want to get the phone as quickly as possible as I have a signed contract to sell my 4S.
No need for Rev B, svdo works fine on the current network. That was the good thing about the spec when it came out. It's just up to the handset makers to implement it. Apple chose not to, it's their phone to build.
That said, I'm disappointed. I have great verizon coverage and no ATT coverage at home or work.
Who cares?
When I'm not in my car, I'm on wifi, if I'm in my car, I don't need to be both on my phone and surfing the web...
In the nearly two years since I switched to Verizion, there has been probably 3 times in which this has been a hinderance...
But... I've had probably 3 dropped calls, as opposed to hundreds of dropped calls from ATT...
Seriously who talks on the phone? Let alone surf the web and talk? I have two phones on a family share plan with 450 minutes and don't even use half of that.
Wow, i didnt even think of that. I'll definitely be looking into that. I'm wondering whether i should switch now by buying an AT&t phone at full price and unlocking it. I know T-mobile is expanding their HSPA+ network which is basically 3G, but i dont mind having 3G until T-mobile eventually implements AWS.