This is so incredibly dangerous! They could damage their Vision Pro.
Both are mind control devices. They're trying to keep you distracted, mad, sad, frustrated, checked out, anything but focused on things that actually matter. Find/curate your own media accordingly, as there are still some normal people (usually not on any large corporate payroll) spreading actual helpful information.Embarrassing beyond words.
Avoiding the news and social media is just about the only way to not hate humanity in 2024.
People use it on planes with no issues.Casey Neistat's video showed it doesn't even work in a subway. The train just moves away from the windows. Same when walking. You just walk through the windows. So I'm pretty sure it won't work in a car.
It's just an idiot pretending to be an even bigger idiot to rage bait.
If thats meant to be some sort of justification then i worry for society.I bet the perfect drivers in this thread dont text and drive
All kidding aside whatever city this occurred in need to do their due diligence and ticket this driver for reckless.god I hate humans
We dont even do this for drunk drivers.....proportion people proportion.Very simple solution...a federal regulation and state regulations banning the use of such devices when operating a motor vehicle or transportation device of any sort (planes, trains, cars, motorcycles, scooters, boats, skateboards, rollerblades, etc. etc.) that will result in the immediate confiscation of the device used with the device being recycled, the immediate impounding of the vehicle it was used with, a immediate revokation and/or suspension of one's operator's license with mandatory application and training and succesful test requirements for a new license, mandatory heavy fines and possible mandatory imprisonment for reckless operation.
In a nutshell, zero mercy for those with such contempt towards the lives and property of others.![]()
He will probably be fine in that death machine steel plated truck, it will be some poor sap driving a honda civic that bites it after getting crushed under it
Not just any Tesla driver.... A cyber truck owner!It’s a Tesla driver, why is anyone surprised.
I don't.I bet the perfect drivers in this thread dont text and drive
> incredibly he reportedly "drove with the headset for 30-40 seconds."
Is that incredible? I mean it's unwise, perhaps stupid and reckless, but it's not really incredible - the thing has high-quality live passthrough video, it's not surprising that you'd be able to drive with it on (even if you shouldn't).
I get the feeling this guy is going to get meme'd for years to come... at least he got the Internet fame he probably wanted.![]()
Do you mean that regardless of how they were actually driving?All kidding aside whatever city this occurred in need to do their due diligence and ticket this driver for reckless.
Someone mentioned peripheral vision. It's more important than we realize. Any eye obstructions would be a bad idea.Do you mean that regardless of how they were actually driving?
A person wearing a AVP headset who is not crossing lanes erratically, not speeding excessively, not ignoring street signs, properly yielding to other drivers, properly using the right of way where needed, or generally speaking not doing anything that would put others or themselves at an unreasonable risk for the situation is not driving recklessly. I'd prefer we hold out reckless driving charges for people who are driving recklessly.
I've seen people completely engaged and paying attention to what they are doing who have run off the road. I've seen people text and drive and never create a hazardous situation for anyone.
Driving with a hot cup of coffee is dangerous for yourself and others around you. The risk of you spilling that coffee and having an involuntary reaction that causes an accident are real and demonstrated everyday. As a society, we accept a fairly high level of risk every time we go near a road. The additional risk created by using an AR headset with low latency passthrough is minimal. Reckless driving is reckless driving regardless of the reason. I don't care if you're doing your taxes, ironing your laundry, or making waffles while you are driving as long as your doing it safely. If someone is 100% engaged and paying attention but are weaving in and out traffic, failing to yield to others, or generally creating chaos on the road, they are a problem.
Nope. They were just lucky that day.…A person wearing a AVP headset who is not crossing lanes erratically, not speeding excessively, not ignoring street signs, properly yielding to other drivers, properly using the right of way where needed, or generally speaking not doing anything that would put others or themselves at an unreasonable risk for the situation is not driving recklessly.…
Apple is in a pickle. They could implement something to disable AVP if the accelerometer detects you are moving more than 5 MPH, but what action should they take? Turn off the cameras in the middle of a parking lot or school crossing?
I assume that you support the banning of drivers who only have use of one eye or limited peripheral vision?Field of view is a huge issue. The headset offers no peripheral vision, and it blocks your natural peripheral vision... which.. is more than a little important while operating a vehicle on the road..
Also, actually paying attention to driving the fraking car rather than whatever clown porn site they have loaded????
sigh
So, your assertion is that reckless and safe driving is determined by eyewear not actions?Nope. They were just lucky that day.
Everyone else in their vicinity was lucky too.
I would have guessed Tesla or Toyota Prius driver. Bonus points if the driver was in California.It’s a Tesla driver, why is anyone surprised.