I think they both went way too far. But i would love to see them come together for a hand shake.
Oh, guess what constant page refreshes do, they use more cellular or WiFi connectivity, cause CPU spikes and all that.One of the reasons Apple stays conservative with how much RAM the devices have is because RAM must always have power from the battery, so with more RAM you get less battery life.
Who wouldn't like more ram?
You really believe that? If they cared about battery life, they would make a thicker device. Also, the 6+ has the same battery life with 2GB as the 6 has with 1GB. Plus, I would hope Apple optimizes a device for when it is used vs. when it is off.One of the reasons Apple stays conservative with how much RAM the devices have is because RAM must always have power from the battery, so with more RAM you get less battery life.
Are you really? Why? Its utterly pointless. Maybe when I can have actual wireless charging so that my phone chargers whilst i'm walking around my house, that would be cool - or at the very least it charges whenever I lay it down on any surface. But having to put it on a pad which slow chargers the phone is really really useless.
The video proves nothing, technically. The author claims it's the extra RAM without any proof.
You really believe that? If they cared about battery life, they would make a thicker device. Also, the 6+ has the same battery life with 2GB as the 6 has with 1GB. Plus, I would hope Apple optimizes a device for when it is used vs. when it it off.
They kept it at 1GB RAM purely because of profit.
And constant website/app reloading doesn't affect battery life?One of the reasons Apple stays conservative with how much RAM the devices have is because RAM must always have power from the battery, so with more RAM you get less battery life.
Dunno what I'm doing different to you guys but I have an iPhone 6 currently running iOS 9.1 beta 2 with crystal ad blocker installed and I'm set on low power mode with the music app running in the background and I have 15 tabs open with no refreshing issues.
Couldn't be bothered to open more in the end but I am having no issues. This could be due to the adblocker installed or 9.1 is just THAT much better.
Most tabs I usually have open is about 2 or 3 and then I usually close them all after I'm done, I do the same on my Mac too but everyone is different.
*edit* forgot I had the Twitter app open in the background too so even more crap in the ram.
And constant website/app reloading doesn't affect battery life?
How come iPhone 6s with a smaller battery than the regular 6 does just fine with 2 gb of RAM?
Hear, hear!Annoying 2 gb wasn't in the 6/6+ to begin with.
Coming from a 5S.... the difference is huge
And the proof of A9 or radio chipset being "much" more efficient?As I stated above in another reply, the radio chipset used and the A9 processor are much more efficient, which I thought would be obvious or else clearly the device would be getting worse battery life with a > 5% smaller battery.
One of the reasons Apple stays conservative with how much RAM the devices have is because RAM must always have power from the battery, so with more RAM you get less battery life.
But i thought 1GB of Ram was enough........
Clearly the RAM should've gotten more priority in previous years. Can't imagine 2GB wasn't possible before. Or was it (just guessing here)?
Well of course If you exit and play a game then they would reload but that's not what the geezer in the video did was it?Exit Safari, play a game. Reopen Safari.
If your webpages don't refresh, I'm calling shenanigans.
Apple doesn't prioritize specs. They prioritize features and user experience. Most users never have more than about 5 tabs open at once. If they do, like typical users, they simply close out all the old tabs to clear more space in the RAM. Apple has never catered to their 5% power user base. The RAM upgrade is fine but only about 5% of iPhone users are going to notice. The rest will just go on using their devices the same way and not whine about it on the forums like this.