Wow this is even worse than I was expecting
Yes, because every single computer in history has included a WebCam.It’s not going to be a computer to me until I can actually use it as a computer and have the webcam not over on the side making it unusable.
You can improve weight distribution even more with the OptiGrabEngadget's Cherlynn Low wore the headset for just 20 minutes with the standard strap and "was in pain" due to the weight of the device. Apple swapped her over to the Dual Loop Band, which "felt much better for weight distribution."
i’d argue AirPods Max, which have the amazing software integration AirPods are known for, but have sound quality that doesn’t rise very high above the current AirPods Pro, and a design that is either “ the most comfortable headphones i’ve ever used” or, what I found in my experience, are extremely uncomfortable after 30 minutes because they’re made out ofmetal and weigh 400G.
What's surprising, though, is that Apple isn't showing us the way forward. @eicca poses a very valid question. What problem does this solve? I agree with your take as well, but it's quite surprising that Apple themselves didn't jump in and show us a whole new way of doing something. Everything they've demoed has been obvious and predictable, more about eye candy and parlor tricks than how this amazing "spatial computer" can solve <pick your problem> better than other computing tools.We don't know what jobs it isn't capable of doing yet, asides from games, which has been proven to be possible with other headsets. This one is self-contained, so that's a step up from headsets that require setup like base stations. I can think of ways my workflow would be improved, like being able to see 3D work in actual 3D, or not being restricted to physical computer screen dimensions.
It won't do everything I need; I have an iPad for drawing, which it handles better than my Macbook while also being much more portable, but it can't replace my Macbook for general stuff and going beyond what the vanilla OS can do.
How often are you expecting to do longform typing on this? And if you are, why not use the ****ing Bluetooth keyboard of your choice like any rational person.Yeah, with the weight issues and the unreliable virtual keyboard, this is a device still in beta.
That would be nice, but you’ll get railroaded tracks at best, similar to Google Street View.Disagree...Not only movies but also VIRTUAL TRAVEL!...Purchasing apps to visit different countries around the world...(Yippee!)
There are many different types of meditation, not all types require you to have your eyes closed.I dont understand the meditation at all....you are supposed to close your eyes. What does it matter what the visuals are?
From Kirk’s communicator to iPhone took more than 40 years, and we’re still waiting for it to flip open.
From Stark’s Jarvis helmet to AVP 13 years. Give it at least another 13 years before we get something close to it.
I would say most of the negative was nitpicky - "I was in pain" - because my long hair was pinching and I didn't ask to change the strap as it slid down my hair - that is filled with glossy hair product.Not exactly a glowing set of hands-on first impressions.
MacRumors did a terrible job quoting this though.... if you read the full review - she was in tears at the end knowing that having that of her own kids one day will be amazing."Immersive video was part of the demonstration, which Low said showed impressive levels of texture. Wollman felt immersed in the scene, but "also excluded" because it's lifelike, but no one in the immersive videos "sees you or interacts with you."
That was the most on brand absurd thing I have read from Engadget. Oh my goodness the amazing perspective to feel excluded from an immersive video. These reviewers are special.
so pretty much like the iPhone? Must I link the original macrumors thread where it decimated the iPhone?Well if this is the best that comes from Apple’s meticulous review farming, I won’t be the least bit surprised if all the unbridled reviewers absolutely decimate the Vision Pro.
…while also saying she’ll feel like a ghost. That paragraph was quite a contradictory read.MacRumors did a terrible job quoting this though.... if you read the full review - she was in tears at the end knowing that having that of her own kids one day will be amazing.
isn’t the current rumor that they’re working on both?
It would not surprise me if we see AR glasses within the next decade, but they’ll definitely be a lot more Google glass than mini Vision Pro.
At least I hope that’s what they do
I’d say the latter is even more unlikely.The battery will never be small enough, so we need to wirelessly broadcast power, right?
We don't know what jobs it isn't capable of doing yet, asides from games, which has been proven to be possible with other headsets. It's probably also worth pointing out that if we don't know what its capabilities and restrictions are, we can't really say for sure if it will be innovative or not. This one is self-contained, so that's a step up from headsets that require setup like base stations, and making VR more viable as a product rather than a niche hobby.
I can think of ways my workflow would be improved, like being able to see 3D work in actual 3D, or not being restricted to physical computer screen dimensions. It won't do everything I need; I have an iPad for drawing, which it handles better than my Macbook while also being much more portable, but it can't replace my Macbook for general stuff and going beyond what the vanilla OS can do. But it's still very important to my workflow despite its limits or any lack of "innovation"
It sounds like what you want won't satisfy you unless it conforms to a traditional desktop anyways, in which case I'd say VR, not just the Vision, isn't for you.
Sounds like the usual set of pro/con/issues/caveats as with most all VR headsets basically
This is going to be underwhelming and niche, especially at this price