No, don’t get confused. The Apple Vision Pro supposed to charge the Apple Pencil itself.Surely it’s for charging the 3D Pencil.
I got to thinking this morning. My work MBP cost about $3.1k (totally worth it). Apple Vison Pro costs $3.5k. In theory, other than maybe the memory and storage, the VP would outperform my M1 Pro laptop, being it has a M2 SOC and all that jazz. The VP is a full-on computer.
Currently, I connect one cable to my MBP when "docked" at home to connect it to two 4k displays and all its accessories. The cable also powers the laptop. What if the Vision Pro could do the same? Literally replacing the laptop. You could carry it around and use it as a headset or plug it in (with one cable) in a desktop situation.
Suddenly the $3.5k price tag isn't all that unreasonable. Maybe this dongle does that? Maybe? One could dream.
I'd also accept this as a way to directly connect to Mac and bring in hardwired virtual displays (multiple).
No, don’t get confused. The Apple Vision Pro supposed to charge the Apple Pencil itself.
Totally reasonable by MacRumors staff standards.LOL i bet even though you pay $3.5k for this it won't come with a battery pack (like you don't get a charger with an iphone). It's something you gotta buy separately and of course Apple will not pass up the opportunity to sell you a dongle.
Well, then it must be either the Camera Connection Kit or the AV Adapter.No, don’t get confused. The Apple Vision Pro supposed to charge the Apple Pencil itself.
Part of me is under a lot of hopium that it's an adapter to be able to use the Vision Pro with PCVR.
PLEASE APPLE I BEG YOU! THE ZUCK HAS COMPLETELY DOMINATED PCVR WE NEED BETTER HEADSETS!
Will the USB-C port operate at full speed or will Apple cripple it and limit it to USB 2.0 speeds?It appears that the adapter has a USB-C cable leading to a Mac Studio in one shot, although there is no definitive view to confirm this. In this scenario, it is possible the adapter could provide a direct connection to a Mac for visionOS app development in Xcode, but the adapter's purpose ultimately remains a mystery for now.
Perhaps you can use your Pro Max iPhone as a battery for Vision Pro.
Really, Vision Pro has no cellular, only WiFi? I guess if I'm mobile I can release the Vision from my backpack and plug it into my Pro Max for battery and cellular.Since Vision Pro has no cellular, you probably need to carry iPhone in your other pocket for data anyway.
Really, Vision Pro has no cellular, only WiFi? I guess if I'm mobile I can release the Vision from my backpack and plug it into my Pro Max for battery and cellular.
A question for MacRumours at the event, how long does the iPhone battery last if Vision Pro is plugged-into a 14 Pro Max using cellular...🧐
My thinking is that EU has mandated (and made law) that ANY consumer electronic must have USB-C power and data capability… so roll forward to “early 2024” and apple would have to be compliant with that with ANY product.
Not sure I understand the point of this. Lots of devices have separate batteries.Is that a dongle?
Does anyone remember the separate battery pack for the GameBoy?
View attachment 2215775
At various points in Apple's Platforms State of the Unions video for developers, a Vision Pro headset with a USB-C adapter attached to the right side of the headset can be seen, leading to some speculation on social media as to what the adapter is for.
![]()
It appears that the adapter has a USB-C cable leading to a Mac Studio in one shot, although there is no definitive view to confirm this. In this scenario, it is possible the adapter could provide a direct connection to a Mac for visionOS app development in Xcode, but the adapter's purpose ultimately remains a mystery for now.
The Vision Pro's external battery pack attaches to the left side of the headset, so the USB-C adapter is connected on the other side.
Vision Pro isn't launching until early 2024, so we'll learn more details about the headset over the coming months. Apple will also be making Vision Pro developer kits available in July, which could help to paint a better picture.
Article Link: Vision Pro With Mystery USB-C Adapter Spotted in WWDC Video
Even though the Apple Vision has M2, which is more powerful than M1, it still has to use a big portion of its computing power to create the virtual environment. The amount of computing power remaining for apps, at this point, is much lower even compared to any M1 Mac.I got to thinking this morning. My work MBP cost about $3.1k (totally worth it). Apple Vison Pro costs $3.5k. In theory, other than maybe the memory and storage, the VP could outperform my M1 Pro laptop, being it has a M2 SOC and all that jazz. The VP is a full-on computer.
Currently, I connect one cable to my MBP when "docked" at home to connect it to two 4k displays and all its accessories. The cable also powers the laptop. What if the Vision Pro could do the same? Literally replacing the laptop. You could carry it around and use it as a headset or plug it in (with one cable) in a desktop situation.
Suddenly the $3.5k price tag isn't all that unreasonable. Maybe this dongle does that? Maybe? One could dream.
I'd also accept this as a way to directly connect to Mac and bring in hardwired virtual displays (multiple).
Apple really wants to be the only one to be able to access or benefit from the extra ports they install in their devices. They put a hidden Lightning port in the Apple TV 4K!Ah yeah… and what Apple did when people wanted to make a band with additional battery in it?
![]()
'Reserve Strap' Suspends Shipments of All Orders Due to Apple Watch Accessory Port Policy Change
It's been a while since Reserve Strap last updated its customers on the status of the device's shipping estimates, but a recent change to the...www.macrumors.com