Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Doesn't the battery connect to the headset via a magnetic connection? Which would make sense for safety reasons. So that adapter is probably to connect USB peripherals to it, right?
 
I thought yesterday of a simple concept … if Vision pro is indeed a computer then nothing stops it to be linked a monitor … this could be the connector to wire it to a monitor … we would then appreciate Apple if this was with a M2 pro … Food for thoughts …
 
Why do you think Apple didn't demo it that way? Or have testers use a keyboard in the demo area?

Being tethered to a heavy headset with a 2 hour battery life is pointless if you can simply buy a 49-inch monitor with a Mac. This is clearly not for productivity.
Better yet, buy three 49-inch monitors so you can spread your work out more. Or buy a Vision Pro and set up three virtual 49" monitors in your workspace. Pack the keyboard and trackpad so that you can be as productive on the plane as you are in the office or at your home office, (because you use your Vision Pro with its three monitor virtual workspace in all three of these locations and more).
 
Hopefully that will allow most people with a 3rd party battery to use the headset but who's holding their breath?
Just connect a third party battery to the usb-c of the existing battery? Hopefully this will enable using it as an external VR-headset, e.g. using it with a mac without having to deal with a compressed video stream over wifi. Or playing SteamVR games, maybe even on Windows.
 
I got to thinking this morning. My work MBP cost about $3.1k (totally worth it). Apple Vison Pro costs $3.5k. In theory, other than maybe the memory and storage, the VP could outperform my M1 Pro laptop, being it has a M2 SOC and all that jazz. The VP is a full-on computer.

Currently, I connect one cable to my MBP when "docked" at home to connect it to two 4k displays and all its accessories. The cable also powers the laptop. What if the Vision Pro could do the same? Literally replacing the laptop. You could carry it around and use it as a headset or plug it in (with one cable) in a desktop situation.

Suddenly the $3.5k price tag isn't all that unreasonable. Maybe this dongle does that? Maybe? One could dream.

I'd also accept this as a way to directly connect to Mac and bring in hardwired virtual displays (multiple).
Nice thougt but it essentially runs iPadOS on a very likely thermally throttled M2. So it "could" outperform a M1 Pro MBP the same way a M2 ipad Air will outperform that.

It has alway been the argument that software is essential for apple's plattforms and that it might make up for less performance for the same price as a compareable windows PC. Seems like nowadays that's different - you get better hardware but less capable software that limits it's usefulness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: airwalk331
This is my belief as well. No way they announce the M3 chip, then put this out at $3,500 without the M3 chip in it.

I think most likely it ships with an M2 since this stuff takes time. But who knows, since they have almost a year maybe production units will get an M3 for a battery life boost and developer units will stick with the M2.
 
Just connect a third party battery to the usb-c of the existing battery? Hopefully this will enable using it as an external VR-headset, e.g. using it with a mac without having to deal with a compressed video stream over wifi. Or playing SteamVR games, maybe even on Windows.
Are you looking at the same MagSafe-to-usbC adapter we are?
 
Really, Vision Pro has no cellular, only WiFi? I guess if I'm mobile I can release the Vision from my backpack and plug it into my Pro Max for battery and cellular.

A question for MacRumours at the event, how long does the iPhone battery last if Vision Pro is plugged-into a 14 Pro Max using cellular...🧐
Macs don’t have cellular either.
 
Anyone know if you can plug in external drives or additional USB peripherals?
Not likely, no usbc port seen or reported on, just a MagSafe style charging connector. good bet its going to be wireless like people used to predict for the iPhone.
 
For charging, yes? The connection to the headset does not carry data.
I believe the article talks about a dongle connected on the opposite side of the headset from the battery port. As far as I know, nobody knows what that port is for, but if it’s real it’s probably for some sort of data. But I still doubt one can connect wired peripherals.
 
I believe the article talks about a dongle connected on the opposite side of the headset from the battery port. As far as I know, nobody knows what that port is for, but if it’s real it’s probably for some sort of data. But I still doubt one can connect wired peripherals.

the dongle is shown attached to the same place the battery normally connects leading people to speculate it’s for direct connection of power. In 360 views of the headset you don’t see any other ports or connection ports. And in no literature on the headset is a data port listed. or wired data connection mentioned. at this point why would Apple not mention this feature?

I wish it was possible to connect wired storage, but makes sense you can’t. you’d look sorta strange with a hard drive dangling down from your head. And doesn’t make sense to have a hard wire plugged in to your headset to get caught up. That’s why they use MagSafe for power.

we will all find out in the weeks ahead. If I’m wrong I’ll come back and take my lumps.
 
the dongle is shown attached to the same place the battery normally connects leading people to speculate it’s for direct connection of power. In 360 views of the headset you don’t see any other ports or connection ports. And in no literature on the headset is a data port listed. or wired data connection mentioned. at this point why would Apple not mention this feature?

I wish it was possible to connect wired storage, but makes sense you can’t. you’d look sorta strange with a hard drive dangling down from your head. And doesn’t make sense to have a hard wire plugged in to your headset to get caught up. That’s why they use MagSafe for power.

we will all find out in the weeks ahead. If I’m wrong I’ll come back and take my lumps.
I believe all the images of VP I’ve seen show the battery cable connected on the left side, but this article shows the dongle on the right side. I suppose it’s possible both sides are for power, but that seems a little redundant. Or maybe the image is flipped for some reason. But a direct power dongle doesn’t seem necessary—it would make more sense to me to just plug power into the VP battery to power the headset and charge the battery simultaneously. The article suggests the data transfer is only for developer purposes, so it might not be a function intended for users. Yeah wired storage and other peripherals would be a bit odd and unApple-like, although it would be nice if it could plug into a Mac for full video stream.
Yeah we’ll see what it is pretty soon.
 
I believe all the images of VP I’ve seen show the battery cable connected on the left side, but this article shows the dongle on the right side. I suppose it’s possible both sides are for power, but that seems a little redundant. Or maybe the image is flipped for some reason. But a direct power dongle doesn’t seem necessary—it would make more sense to me to just plug power into the VP battery to power the headset and charge the battery simultaneously. The article suggests the data transfer is only for developer purposes, so it might not be a function intended for users. Yeah wired storage and other peripherals would be a bit odd and unApple-like, although it would be nice if it could plug into a Mac for full video stream.
Yeah we’ll see what it is pretty soon.

I’d love to be wrong, and have spent weeks googling, reading, and looking at pictures to find any hint of direct wired connections…and this article which admits to being pure speculation is the only one. On the other hand, There are a lot of folks that have used it writing about the need for a good WiFi network. But yep maybe Apple is planning to surprise us. Not sure they have after announcing a product before. Usually they allude to the potential in the future like the smart watch bands that never came connecting through the watch port. Or the ports on the iPad, that allowed it to connect to Apple iPad keyboards. But we shall see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
Anyone know if you can plug in external drives or additional USB peripherals?
While I dont think there will be any USER accessible USBc port for external drives or THIRD party accessories, I’ll go on the record as saying I’m 100% certain that there IS a physical I/O port, most likely usbC, for various other purposes or future use cases.

Let the games begin.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: G5isAlive
While I dont think there will be any USER accessible USBc port for external drives or THIRD party accessories, I’ll go on the record as saying I’m 100% certain that there IS a physical I/O port, most likely usbC, for various other purposes or future use cases.

Let the games begin.

It'd be nice if you could connect the AVP to existing PC Sim systems... I'm not interested in Zoom or MS Office strapped to my face for even 30min a day, but using it with my existing iRacing hardware... That would have been great.

Until there's a native "killer app" for this thing, connectivity to the wider world of sim/vr would have helped sell more units, which would attract more developers to make native apps, one of which could be the "killer app".. sadly.

Maybe iFixit will open one up and find the port and post how to access it. Maybe they'll find out that when you connect it via USB-C to a Mac or PC it comes up as a display?

Fingers crossed.
 
While I dont think there will be any USER accessible USBc port for external drives or THIRD party accessories, I’ll go on the record as saying I’m 100% certain that there IS a physical I/O port, most likely usbC, for various other purposes or future use cases.

Let the games begin.

you mean like the a six-pin charging port concealed in the little notch that connects the wristband to the watch? or the Smart Connector is on the back of the iPad, and has three small, magnetic contacts? is that what you mean by 100% certain the APV is going to have a physical port? Can I ask your source?

regardless, I got excited too many times by the allusions to in the future those ports were going to be useful to the consumer as data ports. hasn't happened. charging on the iPad on their expensive keyboard yes.. I/o? no.

I'll go on record saying I am 99.999% certain nothing useful in terms of I/O will come from any physical ports on the APV. I'm a scientist, never say always (or 100%).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.