And I am using UTM to run macOS El Capitan on my M1 Max:VMware is trash. UTM all the way.
That means that it is emulating an Intel CPU.
And I am using UTM to run macOS El Capitan on my M1 Max:VMware is trash. UTM all the way.
It’s a preview download. I was able to obtain it through Parallels, but if you do a Web search, you’ll find ways to download an ISO.Where do you even get Windows 11 for ARM?
My need is for SolidWorks and Autodesk Inventor to function on my M1 Max MacBook Pro at least as well as they did on my 2017 MacBook Pro, which was disappointment in so many other ways.Ultimately, the end goal should be Apple Silicon emulating a processor like Intel core i7 12900K at full speed and RTX 3060 at full speed to run those native windows applications. It’s unfortunate VMware decides to not go to the emulation route and focus on hypervisor only.
I wish one day apple silicon is powerful enough to run windows with emulation. But for now, windows on ARM with x64 emulation should be fine for some people. Me? I still need to carry two machines around, sadly.
Windows on ARM will absolutely be released and out of beta and I’d even say eventually will be the main version.
And we can thank the M1 for accelerating interest in it.
So what’s the point of running Windows 11 if you can’t run x86 apps?
A bash of its former self?Nah keep this unresolved. Stop using Ubuntu. That entire distro is bloatware and a shell of it's former self. There's better ARM Linux distros you can be using. Use Arch, Fedora, or Asahi instead.
You can download it thru MS as it's currently in preview.Where do you even get Windows 11 for ARM?
It is like a nested virtualization. The VM with Windows performance is sloppy and adding another virtual layer would be unbearable. UTM's performance is sloppy as well by the wa.You can't run x64 windows, but you can run ARM windows, and ARM windows can run x64 windows apps/binaries via its equivalent to Rosetta 2
Actionable pun detectedA bash of its former self?
VMWare Fusion Player is free for personal use, unlike Parallels that forces you to spend $100 every year.I used to use those VM software to run windows, then I realized why not just buy a few windows computers to throw around instead? They don't expire every year like VM licenses do.
Haha, VMware are the leading company when it comes to virtualization. Take a look at esxi, vsphere, horizon etcVMware is trash. UTM all the way.
VMware seems way behind the curve here. Parallels has supported running Windows 11 for over a year now. The installation process is extremely streamlined (it downloads and prepares the installer for you), and it has full OpenGL and DirectX 3D acceleration support. I’ve been using it very happily to run a couple Windows (x86) games and some other software I use and it works great.
An M1 Mac Pro with “Pen support”, it seemsI've been running Windows 11 Pro on Parallels since December on an M1 Mac Pro
yep. Microsoft and Parallels keeping their options open just in case Apple release a touch screen MacAn M1 Mac Pro with “Pen support”, it seems![]()
Running Windows ARM (which is still in beta) on Apple silicon is a dicey proposition at best, I've found. You're basically banking on the hopes that Windows ARM will eventually be released officially and out of beta.
General performance of many apps on Apple Silicon (with Parallels Desktop, VMWare's competitor) was improved over running on Macs with Intel chips, I found. However, having to frequently download the latest builds of Windows 11 ARM was always a crappy, time-wasting experience for me (when using Parallels Desktop). Since this is a "feature" of Windows 11 ARM beta, I don't suppose it will be any better with VMware.
And I am using UTM to run macOS El Capitan on my M1 Max:
View attachment 2036342
That means that it is emulating an Intel CPU.
Fine but… M1 macOS has a built-in emulator.Bro, that was never in the cards. That requires an emulator. VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop are not emulator products the way Connectix/Microsoft Virtual PC was for PowerPC; they're Hypervisors.