Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
View attachment 1816766

Should have watched Planet of the Apes, just once. Just like any business in the world the more people/money the more global say, importance and strength. Now the UK is gonna loose Scotland rather soon (I predict) which leaves them even more alone. Good luck, you're gonna need it.
Just give the English a vote on that one, and voila the Scottish albatross will be released from our backs!
 
I think this is an opportunity for other providers to draw in new customers by retaining the free roaming. O2 currently still provide it (up to 25GB per month), so if you traveled a lot then moving from Vodafone would make sense.

 
I see 2 sides to be fair - it was never really "free" roaming, everyone just paid towards the costs of roaming if you actually used it or not.

If those who have no need for EU roaming can genuinely get a better price than they are paying now on one of these new tariff's then I dont see this as so bad - although I suspect most company's who re-introduce these will just pocket the extra!
I see you do not remember the roaming charges before the EU regulators stepped in..

The UK made their decision, live with it.. you're always welcome back my friends.. until then, costs going up, or quality goes down.. not always a bad thing, not having internet during your holidays..
 
As soon as the operators stated they had no plans to reintroduce roaming charges after Brexit you just knew several of them had a clock ticking down to the point where they suddenly would have plans...

It's clear that this is just a money grab from them and no doubt it will slowly increase over the next few years. Only £2/day now but I bet it gets up to £3-£4/day by the mid 2020s.

Thankfully I'm on Three and I can see them retaining free EU roaming (alongside the other countries they offer). Their coverage and speed isn't great, but I believe they've bought up more 5G spectrum that the others, so I'm hoping they get a bit better on that soon as we move to 5G.
 
Last edited:
Who cares? If Brits are as nationalistic as they say, they should spend their holidays in the UK. Not inflate the pockets of those evil bureaucrats in Bruxelles.
i feel like its the remoaners who are complaining, as they are more upper class on average and will go on vacation more often. i agree those unelected bureaucrats dont deserve the uk's money
 
I see you do not remember the roaming charges before the EU regulators stepped in..

The UK made their decision, live with it.. you're always welcome back my friends.. until then, costs going up, or quality goes down.. not always a bad thing, not having internet during your holidays..
I do remember roaming charges actually, I moved network to Three at one point as they included roaming across multiple countrys (The USA was a big one for me) which was nothing to do with EU regulations. They clearly saw a market there and was able to include it in their tarif price.

So far the networks reintroducing any sort of roaming charges are 1. Cheaper compared to what it ever was before and 2. Offer alternative tariffs which include roaming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gabebear
As others have said, it was always going to happen. It was the EU that put the pressure on the mobile network operators to do away with roaming charges. The network operators have never liked it because it cut off a very good revenue stream for the network operators. Having the UK leave the EU means the UK mobile network operators are no longer constrained by EU law hence the re-introduction of roaming charges.
What's the reason why non-users of roaming should be expected to subsidise the few people who do use roaming?

Why is it more unreasonable for those who want something niche to be expected to pay the costs of it directly?
 
Just more stealth taxation. There doesn’t need to be a charge AT ALL. The parasites in government could have negotiated this quite easily if we had a party that actually cared about us. “You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” takes literally seconds to agree upon. I was with Three for years and then went with EE in 2015. I spent just under £350pm (business line and 5 of us in the house), until 2 months ago and have just moved back to Three. If Three try this roaming thing then I’ll be moving back to carrier pigeon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LinusR
1. What has this got to do will Apple?
2. Like the previous EE announcement this doesn’t apply to all tariffs/plans and doesn’t affect people in contract. So a non story really, as you choose a provider that offers the services you want.
3. Operator Three offered free international roaming in Europe, as well as the USA, before it was mandatory in Europe. Therefore I’d hope this won’t change, if it does it wouldn’t be on all tariffs, just like EE and Vodafone. So choose a tariff that meets your needs.

Also anyone who voted to leave the EU and expected a quick payback were very naïve. I voted leave and I am more than happy, and yes I spend many holidays in Europe.
 
  • Love
Reactions: calstanford
It's what Brits wanted. It's what Brits deserve. Not sure why that's surprising or 'news'
Speak for everybody why don’t you. I love Europe and voted remain BUT I can also understand why some voted leave. The never ending boat loads of poor, suffering young men with Nike trainers coming over (zzzzzz). The problem was that the first European country they landed in should have taken them and/or put a stop to it. They didn’t. They let them pass and pass and pass until they came to the UK. It is still happening now despite being out of Europe.
 
I don't see a problem. Simply get a local SIM in an EU country that provide free roaming on the EU, no?

I mean anybody else has to roam whenever they visit a different country. Getting a local SIM is not a new concept. Just use a dual SIM phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agit21
At the moment this is for only new contracts, so if your contract is years old there are no roaming charges, so if roaming is important to you don't upgrade to a new contract.
 
I’ll just turn roaming off on my iPhone and use WiFi calling as most resorts offer this that I have stayed in.

It’s also another reason now to limit holidays to mainland Europe and give our business to UK locations instead. I don’t know many people who are in a rush to travel abroad yet anyway.

It’s just 2 quid a day for us, but ultimately it’s the other countries that lose out as it’s adding to an already high cost. I feel more sorry for the foreign businesses desperate for tourism to pick back up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agit21
And here I am. I can use my AT&T plan all through North America. No extra charges. 🤪
 
What's the reason why non-users of roaming should be expected to subsidise the few people who do use roaming?

Why is it more unreasonable for those who want something niche to be expected to pay the costs of it directly?
It's not necessarily reasonable but it seems beneficial to the EU:
  • Unify markets
  • Encourage EU-wide network infrastructure
  • Increase tourism revenue
  • Unify cultures
  • Bread and circuses
I don't know the actual motivations but looking at it with the EU's interests in mind may help clarify things.
 
I don't see a problem. Simply get a local SIM in an EU country that provide free roaming on the EU, no?

I mean anybody else has to roam whenever they visit a different country. Getting a local SIM is not a new concept. Just use a dual SIM phone.

Not always that simple. In Germany buying a local SIM card (prepaid) requires a ID check now which you either have to do at a post office or via a Videocall with App XY. Of course the instructions are only in German too
 
  • Like
Reactions: timber
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.