Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We will welcome to Scottish with open arms :)

Too bad they will have to pay roaming charges when calling England.
As much as I think this move is despicable by the UK operators, there is no chance when (hopefully) Scotland becomes independent and joins the EU, that roaming would apply going between Scotland and England. If as detailed in above it won’t apply going from the UK & Northern Ireland to Republic Ireland - it won’t apply Scotland to England and vice versa.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pezimak
But funnily enough, T-Mobile NL is the only Dutch provider who does not count Switzerland (a non-EU state) as an EU member so if, for example, you drive from the Netherlands to Italy you will face roaming charges for the Swiss bit of your trip. As for the grandparent: mobile operators were indeed forced by the EU to abolish roaming charges, so you'll have to wait until Serbia and North Macedonia join the EU, or they get so far in the process that the earlier agreements already provide for the abolition of roaming charges.

As for the British operators reinstating roaming charges, this was obviously always going to happen. When they were forced to get rid of them, they were happy to take the credit, but it was always EU rules that forced them to and many operators throughout Europe complained and conjured up nightmare scenarios about how this would lead to higher prices for consumers, but as far as I can tell this hasn't happened anywhere in the EU.

It really annoys me about British business, they are forced to enact something by law or regulation, and the following week you see TV ads portraying it as something the company is doing as a favour to you, as though it's something they offer over their competitors, no mention of the fact all business in its sector are doing the exact same as its law ie regulation. Broadband companies are particularly bad at it.
 
Would be nice if the EU operators offer the same for traveling to non-EU countries!
I see 2 sides to be fair - it was never really "free" roaming, everyone just paid towards the costs of roaming if you actually used it or not.

I do not know how roaming was setup but I would guess carriers offset each other's roaming so the net costs were zero.
If those who have no need for EU roaming can genuinely get a better price than they are paying now on one of these new tariff's then I dont see this as so bad - although I suspect most company's who re-introduce these will just pocket the extra!

Did teh UK see a price drop when they left?

Hoping Three keep it free. They have had free roaming outside of the EU in some countries, so might make a 'because of brexit' argument a bit harder for them to use.

TMob does that from the US as well, in quite a few countries. It's low speed data and text but there is no charge and it's fast enough for VoIP and light internet use. I can buy high speed data if I want.

They do in some cases... my T-Mob Dutch contract includes unlimited data/voice roaming in the EU and US... for 35Eur/mo... in my prior life I do know many countries (UAE, Serbia included) really "protected" their carriers who want to gouge foreigners coming in and roaming... that may have changed, but greed can explain a lot.

TMob overall seem to be the best if you roam. I can use it when I am in teh EU, Africa or teh Middle East. VoIP is blocked in some countries to, as you say, protect their carriers and gouge people but VPNs fix that.

What's the reason why non-users of roaming should be expected to subsidise the few people who do use roaming?

Why is it more unreasonable for those who want something niche to be expected to pay the costs of it directly?

In general everyone did not pay for it, as carriers probably had roaming agreements that allowed others to roam on their network in exchange for their customers to roam on theirs; and offset the usage. It's no different in many ways than if yo can't get your carriers signal but can get Y's in your home area you don't get charged and the carriers simply worked a deal to allow this so customers don't lose coverage.
 
What's the reason why non-users of roaming should be expected to subsidise the few people who do use roaming?

Why is it more unreasonable for those who want something niche to be expected to pay the costs of it directly?
Because it doesn’t cost the providers any significant extra. They are charging people extra just because they can now. Roaming doesn’t actually cost 1 pound a day to providers. Contract prices didn’t go up when roaming became free in the EU, they stayed exactly the same. Just as they won’t go down for people not using roaming now it’s gone. It will just be an extra charge on top. Noone is ’subsidising’ anyone.
 
Taking back control 🤣

Cheers to all those morons who wanted “freedom”.

These disgusting networks were always going to do this, shame people didn’t want to accept that maybe the EU were looking out for us

It wasn’t so much the EU looking out for you, it was 447 million folks looking out for common interests and GB had a unique and major role in steering that.

Now except for trying to renege on deals like the backstop it doesn’t have quite as much leverage or any steering control of EU initiatives than any other 3rd party country.

As for the telecoms, they do this because they can. They do it slow at first to minimize howling but long term, it’s a boiling frog experiment for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timber
Good luck to all the UK tourists - 8 out of the top 10 holiday destinations for brits are in the EU.

Yeah, and you’re 1 out of 800,000. Everyone else isn’t going to do a “staycation” at home because of some sort of political pouting. They’ll continue to travel to nearby destinations in Europe because it’s still the most accessible and convenient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duncan-UK
Because it doesn’t cost the providers any significant extra. They are charging people extra just because they can now. Roaming doesn’t actually cost 1 pound a day to providers. Contract prices didn’t go up when roaming became free in the EU, they stayed exactly the same. Just as they won’t go down for people not using roaming now it’s gone. It will just be an extra charge on top. Noone is ’subsidising’ anyone.
If it's an unreasonable charge and suppliers are mugging customers off then there's a great opportunity for competitors to do things differently and win the impacted business.
 
Citation required.
Here you go, from a research note by Enders Analysis (media consultants)


This move is somewhat inevitable as current arrangements leave operators exposed to up to €75 of monthly wholesale charges, and even more as legacy EU wholesale deals expire​

Although the EU has regulated down the maximum wholesale rates that operators can charge each other for carrying roaming traffic, they nonetheless remain meaningful at €3 per GB (to fall to €2.50 from January next year). Of course, if traffic flows were even between countries, the absolute level of wholesale tariffs would not really matter. However, unfortunately for UK operators, the flows are uneven in favour of other EU countries and the disparity has worsened since the roaming premia disappeared in 2017, as UK tourists to Europe have increased their usage much more dramatically than the less price-elastic business visitors to the UK have. Negotiated rates between operators may be lower than these EU ceiling prices in many instances and several operators will benefit from having sister operations in other EU countries (Vodafone and VMO2 in particular), limiting their exposure. Conversely, once outside the EU, European operators are no longer obliged to abide by these ceiling rates, further increasing the UK operators' exposure. As discussed earlier, the expiry of these deals within the EU ceiling rates at the end of this year is a major factor in determining the timing of Vodafone's move today.”
 
Rule Britannia! Britannia rule the waves! We shall never ever pay for roaming aw dang…
 
What's the Vodafone UK roaming partner network in Spain......? Well, of course, it's Vodafone ES.

I suspect that Vodafone are going to apply the European roaming charge to the less expensive plans (you can go as low as £11 per month). In the UK, we have lots of competition which keeps prices quite low. I'm on Vodafone and pay around £30 for totally unlimited 5G and free roaming in 84 countries (including the US) - it also includes my Apple Watch connection. I can't really complain.
 
They do it in Switzerland not belonging to the EU or the EEA, so why should there be any difference for the UK not being part of the EU or EEA.
 
You don’t think the role of governments is to regulate markets?
Did they say that? I thought they were saying the UK should look to the UK government to regulate markets, not some parent government.

You do all know this is £1-£2 per day right? And there's a whole world going on outside the EU? You should visit, it's lovely.
 
You do all know this is £1-£2 per day right? And there's a whole world going on outside the EU? You should visit, it's lovely.
Yes but the cellphone prices are even more outrageous. Rip off prices for me with my Swedish owned Norwegian sim card, in the US, China, Japan, Turkey etc. etc. So bad I have to invest in a local sim card.

For the Brits, this is what they meant when they said having your cake and eating it :) Another reason not to visit the UK.
 
Cue thousands of remainers complaining that they're mildly inconvenienced when travelling on holidays that many of the working classes never had and could never afford.

I know this may come as news to the working class that "never could afford to travel abroad", but the Spanish costas are not part of the UK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirdir
Before that idiotic referendum I recall of those right wing wingnuts claiming that of course free roaming would remain after we left the world's biggest free trade zone and burnt every bridge imaginable. That, like everything else they said was a steaming pile of manure.

Truly the most dishonest, brainless, and truly sadistic bunch of psychopaths in political history. May they burn in hell.
 
Yeah, and you’re 1 out of 800,000. Everyone else isn’t going to do a “staycation” at home because of some sort of political pouting. They’ll continue to travel to nearby destinations in Europe because it’s still the most accessible and convenient.

Even before the pandemic though the UK tourism industry was growing fast with latest stats suggesting it to grow 3.8% per year until 2025. The staycation sector is our fastest growing sector and this has taken some business off foreign resorts. When you consider a country like Spain receives most of their tourism from Germany and the UK, it’s having a drastic impact. Adding additional costs to tourists doesn’t help those reliant on tourism either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pezimak
Good luck to all the UK tourists - 8 out of the top 10 holiday destinations for brits are in the EU.

The most popular destinations for UK tourists are:

1 - Spain (EU)
2 - France (EU)
3 - Italy (EU)
4 - USA
5 - Ireland (EU)
6 - Netherlands (EU)
7 - Greece (EU)
8 - Germany (EU)
9 - Portugal (EU)
10 - Poland (EU)

So yeah, leaving the EU was an act of such stupidity it's simply impossible to comprehend on any rational level. Truly the worst foreign policy mistake in British history. The sad thing is that the return of roaming charges is just a side story. The real issue is the near total collapse in exports to the EU due to crippling amounts of red tape, additional charges, and import tariffs.

If you were to try and come up with a way to sabotage a country's prosperity for decades to come in one fell swoop, Brexit would be it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.