Every computer has bottlenecks i.e. performance limitations. Or do you mean something else? Nothing about your proposed configuration would be so constraining as to prevent other limits from being reached. Apple have sold millions of MBPs with 2.x GHz, 16GB of DRAM, and 256GB of SSD (not yet with Iris Pro 6200 of course).
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Waiting for Broadwell MBP Thread
- Thread starter UBS28
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Every computer has bottlenecks i.e. performance limitations. Or do you mean something else? Nothing about your proposed configuration would be so constraining as to prevent other limits from being reached. Apple have sold millions of MBPs with 2.x GHz, 16GB of DRAM, and 256GB of SSD (not yet with Iris Pro 6200 of course).
That's all I was wondering about. Like if you get a 16GB with a 256
Or a high 2.X CPU with a 256 SSD or low RAM
If one part could render the the part a waste of money.
Like you have a high 2.X CPU but because you only got 256 SSD or 8GB ram that extra CPU is useless
No problem. All the configurations offered by Apple are entirely reasonable.
On that one note, I would have to say the generally if it came down to getting a slight processor bump (like 0.2-0.4 gHz) or getting something like double the SSD space or increasing the ram, I would always choose an upgrade for the latter within reason.
Each one of those specs tends to do slightly different things for you though in terms of performance and based on what each one does, you can prioritize what you need.
Or you can throw prioritization out the window, sell a bunch of stuff, work a little longer, save a little more, and then just get the highest performing you want and don't worry about it...
On that one note, I would have to say the generally if it came down to getting a slight processor bump (like 0.2-0.4 gHz) or getting something like double the SSD space or increasing the ram, I would always choose an upgrade for the latter within reason.
Each one of those specs tends to do slightly different things for you though in terms of performance and based on what each one does, you can prioritize what you need.
Or you can throw prioritization out the window, sell a bunch of stuff, work a little longer, save a little more, and then just get the highest performing you want and don't worry about it...
I'd like to get a 3.1/16/512 13" but don't want to spend that kind of money without a dGPU
I'd like to get a 3.1/16/512 13" but don't want to spend that kind of money without a dGPU
Yeah, but at that cost, your better off waiting and picking up 15" refurb with dgpu when they are available at the online Apple Store.
It really sounds to me like that would fit what you want at close to the price. Sure it's pricey, but I consider things like that a long-ish term investment as well. With that kinda of performance and apple support, these thing can easily last 4+ years.
I'd like to get a 3.1/16/512 13" but don't want to spend that kind of money without a dGPU
Get an eGPU. I am selling my 2010 MBP today hoping they are coming out with new ones in June. If not, no big. It's a want not a need and I have my 09 MP to keep me company in the mean time.
Im sure the Iris Pro 6200 will be a nice bump.
(from notebookcheck.com; yes, I know the values for the Iris Pro 6200 are missing ;-)
I dont want a dedicated GPU. Too many bad experiences in the last decade. A dedicated GPU is (better: will soon be) a thing of the past.
I just hope the top-line model will be available without dGPU.
(from notebookcheck.com; yes, I know the values for the Iris Pro 6200 are missing ;-)
I dont want a dedicated GPU. Too many bad experiences in the last decade. A dedicated GPU is (better: will soon be) a thing of the past.
I just hope the top-line model will be available without dGPU.
Almost certain that will happen. The only question mark is whether there will be a discrete GPU.
the latest 3dMark shows an 25% increase over the 5100 for the new 6100. If the new 6200 is the same that's a nice update (for an iGPU). Skylake should boost 50% increase over broadwell... That's even nicer
Apple will never again sell any 13" laptop with a discrete GPU -- or a discrete FPU.I'd like to get a 3.1/16/512 13" but don't want to spend that kind of money without a dGPU
http://9to5mac.com/2015/05/18/new-15-inch-macbook-pro-imac-27/
Looks like the update might come on wednesday!
Looks like the update might come on wednesday!
9to5 Mac is quite a reputed site. Lets hope the information is credible.
----------
9to5 Mac is quite a reputed site. Lets hope the information is credible.
If this comes true, would I need to be ordering early on Wednesday or will I be able to snag one any time starting that day. I am so use to the wait list with iPhones I was wondering if this is similar ?
Indeed
Skylake should boost 50% increase over broadwell... That's even nicer
Yes, … 2016 …
If we get a Skylake MBP15 in Feb 2016 (at the earliest), that’s 8 months after the Broadwell MBP, that’s just a modest (and virtual!) 6% increase per month
So, I think I’ll go with the 25% in June
. Math.Indeed
Yes, 2016
If we get a Skylake MBP15 in Feb 2016 (at the earliest), thats 8 months after the Broadwell MBP, thats just a modest (and virtual!) 6% increase per month
So, I think Ill go with the 25% in June
It all depends on how my 2011 will do the next year (now that the RadeonGate is repaired)... But the IPS screen is alluring for sure, the current TN panel isn't that great compared to my 24" IPS at home.
Indeed
Yes, 2016
If we get a Skylake MBP15 in Feb 2016 (at the earliest), thats 8 months after the Broadwell MBP, thats just a modest (and virtual!) 6% increase per month
So, I think Ill go with the 25% in June
Well if it's the same model without any color options or not even a single USB c I don't think it's really worth it, is it?
The verge has just confirmed it!
A month after updating the 13-inch MacBook Pro with its new Force Touch trackpad tech, Apple has today revamped two of its bigger siblings, releasing new versions of its 15-inch MacBook Pro and 27-inch iMac. As with the 13-inch model, the new 15-inch MacBook Pro now boasts a Force Touch trackpad, while the new 27-inch iMac is losing its hybrid hard drive setup but selling for a lower price, $1,999.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/19/8623803/apple-retina-imac-macbook-pro-updates
A month after updating the 13-inch MacBook Pro with its new Force Touch trackpad tech, Apple has today revamped two of its bigger siblings, releasing new versions of its 15-inch MacBook Pro and 27-inch iMac. As with the 13-inch model, the new 15-inch MacBook Pro now boasts a Force Touch trackpad, while the new 27-inch iMac is losing its hybrid hard drive setup but selling for a lower price, $1,999.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/19/8623803/apple-retina-imac-macbook-pro-updates
The new MacBook Pro lineup is already available to buy at the Apple Online Store.
AMD M370X for the most expensive 15" model.
And, according to the description in the configuration options, with Haswell processors. Still no Broadwell processors.
From Apple's website.
AMD M370X for the most expensive 15" model.
And, according to the description in the configuration options, with Haswell processors. Still no Broadwell processors.
From Apple's website.
Last edited:
Well shoot, I was planning on getting this one but no Broadwell has be iffy. Granted this is a want, not a need and I was planning on selling it once Skylake comes out, what does everyone think (I'd get the dGPU model). Is it worth it? What's Broadwells performance upgrade been? 10% in the 13s? I guess I was mainly looking for a graphics boost.