I'm guessing the 2.0 base model 15" is going to get more than 8 hours of battery life. Apple quotes for the 15" getting up to 8 hours includes the models with higher clocked CPU's and discrete GPU right?
Guys, you should wait a bit. After couple of months last year, Apple released more option to configure your CPU. It was like 100$ for 2.6 Ghz last year. And fastest CPU added later. I was like damn you, Apple.
Yup, looks like that's how they lowered the price on the 15inch.
The top-end 15 is the better deal now, especially with the 16gb RAM and 512gb SSD.
That's still pretty messed up though. Come on Apple.
Are you saying that if I choose the base 15'' for $1999 and opt to upgrade the cpu from 2.0ghz to 2.3ghz for $100 additional, then my 15'' will automatically receive the 750m?
??
SO happy it is here at last after 8 months of waiting for my first Apple machine..
got to decide on the configuration now..
I know I want the 13" with 16 GB RAM..and 512 Gb SSD..what I don't know is which processor to get..
Choice of
2.4GHz i5
2.6GHz i5
2.8GHz i7
I mainly want it for fairly heavy Photo editing..is it worth getting the i7?..what will be the noticeable difference between them?
Also want it to be as future proof as possible..
Hope for answers as am confused as to which to get..
Cheers guys
Click on the 'MacBook Pro with Retina Display Tech Specs' tab:
http://store.apple.com/ca/buy-mac/macbook-pro
dGPU is really only worth it for gaming. And iGPU would consume less battery. I personally would not even consider a dGPU.
Is it worth it to upgrade to the 2.6Ghz from 2.3Ghz?
Guys, you should wait a bit. After couple of months last year, Apple released more option to configure your CPU. It was like 100$ for 2.6 Ghz last year. And fastest CPU added later. I was like damn you, Apple.
I'm guessing the 2.0 base model 15" is going to get more than 8 hours of battery life. Apple quotes for the 15" getting up to 8 hours includes the models with higher clocked CPU's and discrete GPU right?
I'm sorry, but this image is still not a proof. It becomes then a proof, when it's written black on white that the 750m is included.
Now the thing is, I want to believe you, but why should Apple make 2 different sections for the MBP 15", if everything could be customized within the same section with radio buttons?
And another thing: people would be stupid if they would buy the 2.0Ghz version with a worse GPU just for the sake of 100$.
Which brings me to the next point: if the 750m is really included, we don't know how many dedicated RAM this GPU has. 512? 1 GB 2GB? Something stinks here.
Nowhere does it explicitly say that the 750 is included into the 2.3+ option.
Is there much difference between the 13" CPUs?
Edu price upgrades:
2.4GHz Dual-core Intel Core i5, Turbo Boost up to 2.9GHz
2.6GHz Dual-core Intel Core i5, Turbo Boost up to 3.1GHz [+ £68.40]
2.8GHz Dual-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.3GHz [+ £206.40]
Can't decide between base i5 or i7
Ok guys I bought the base model with 4GB RAM.
I decided I will test it a lot in two weeks.
If, given my needs, I'm satisfied I will keep it.
If not I will return and add the 8gb instead.
So 13" i5/4/128
Is this on the 256GB and 8GB RAM version? Exactly my dilemma. Leaning toward the i7 to future proof the machine.
Now contemplating 16Gb RAM but I'm doubting that I'll need it. I don't use the computer for gaming and video editing would be occasional. Ruled out the 512 SSD because I can just buy an external hard drive if I need more storage.
No. Battery quotes have always been based on the iGPU. In this case, we're talking about the same GPU in both models. The dGPU is actually irrelevant. Therefore, you should assume 8 hours in both cases. And since real world usage usually is a bit behind marketing claims, that means probably less than an hour of improvement over the previous generation.