Apple Page says the camera is still 720p. Is that correct?
If it is on the specs page, then I'm sure it is. Dammit, I was hoping for a 1080p camera like was rumored. Oh well. I'm just glad the 13-inch got thinner/lighter + we got Thunderbolt 2.
Apple Page says the camera is still 720p. Is that correct?
Yeah, I think you're right.
I'm going to wait a little longer and go for a retina with 8GB RAM. I'll decide on the processor when it comes to checkout time.
If it is on the specs page, then I'm sure it is. Dammit, I was hoping for a 1080p camera like was rumored. Oh well. I'm just glad the 13-inch got thinner/lighter + we got Thunderbolt 2.
I think they screwed up the specs page. The other explanation doesn't make any sense. Currently:
Base model without dGPU ($1999) + 2,3Ghz + 16GB Ram + 512GB flash = $2599
Top-end model with dGPU = $2599
In addition, we had those leaks from that chinese website which turned out to be spot on. Those only spoke of three versions: 2,0Ghz without dGPU and 2,3Ghz/2,6Ghz with dGPU.
Your line of reasoning is presumptive. Those BTO options are hugely profitable, but many consumers purchase only one or two. Sales on high-end models also lag. It's entirely possible that the whole idea here to offer a "bundle" of features that appear to be at a discount from their disaggregated prices, with the goal of getting more users to upgrade to the higher-end configuration. Apple still gets more profit dollars (and margin percentages, too), while letting users think they've gotten a "better deal." We've already seen some people in this thread believing that very thing.
In short, rather than assuming it doesn't make sense, an alternative hypothesis is that it's clever, projections-based marketing.
Ordered maxed out 15" within 30 seconds of store relaunch. Not ****ing around this time, I want this thing here within 24 hours.
Is this on the 256GB and 8GB RAM version? Exactly my dilemma. Leaning toward the i7 to future proof the machine.
Now contemplating 16Gb RAM but I'm doubting that I'll need it. I don't use the computer for gaming and video editing would be occasional. Ruled out the 512 SSD because I can just buy an external hard drive if I need more storage.
If you're simply getting a slight clock-speed bump and maybe Hyper-threading out of the deal, as is the case in the new iMacs and the 13" Retina MacBook Pro, your money is going to be best spent elsewhere unless you regularly do very CPU-heavy tasks like video editing and transcoding or very heavy Photoshop work, and the minutes and seconds you'll save with a marginally faster CPU are important to you.
Why is everyone going 16GB? 8GB not enought? With the pcie-HD, Mavericks etc do you really need 16?
Will do some matlab etc, but nothing too heavy...
Why is everyone going 16GB? 8GB not enought? With the pcie-HD, Mavericks etc do you really need 16?
Will do some matlab etc, but nothing too heavy...
Seriously? In what way is not needing a dgpu a crazy statement?
for Uni work, internet etc all the usual! Is RAM or CPU more important?? Coming from a 15" rMBP that was stupidly way to much for my needs!!