Think we are looking at +600 pages in this thread before we see a new MBP. Hang in there.
If there is no redesign, would the graphics upgrade on Skylake 550 or 540 even warrant much of an upgrade compared to the 6100 for the 13in?
I see it being a great improvement for the 5200 vs 580/p, but not so much for the 6100 vs 550/540 on the 13in. It's damn near identical give or take 3-5 fps on most games or programs.
I may be going crazy here only having an IPP as my only mobile laptopish currently. But if they don't do a redesign, I'm going to be kicking myself in the ass for not buying a 13in MBP now. 15in is pretty much a no go any more now that I have a monster pc workstation.
Clearly, I'm saying that the idea of Apple having such tremendous power over Intel is "oft-repeated" by you. And yes, I'm very aware what this thread is about. I'm not accusing you of being off-topic on this. I'm saying you're being stubbornly and illogically committed to an idea that has very little to no substantiation in reality.
As HighRes15 just posted, in recent memory, Apple has had special treatment from Intel exactly one time: with the custom Core 2 Duo Merom chips for the original MBA. You have been repeatedly unable to provide any evidence for your fanatical devotion to your "omnipotent Apple" argument. But at this point, it's become painfully obvious that you enjoy making unfounded arguments/statements in spite of evidence, not because of it; any further discussion on this with you is a waste of time for me and everyone else.
At least the skylake 13" MBP will be able to drive a 5k display (such as the dell 27") over TB3, right ?
Whereas the current one can only do 4k
This is a key reason for me to wait, as I use my MBP (current one 15" mid 2010) a lot closed with a desktop display, and I want to go over to 5k (or at least 4 but having the possibility to go further)
Super awesome post man. Thanks for the info and for sharing.
In your opinion.
Apple have the ability to pressure Intel. Apple could decide to start looking at more ARM if Intel don't bend over backwards for them.
Look, I think it's about a 10% or 20% probability that the next MBP will have Kaby Lake, but wouldn't it be amazing if Apple could pull it off and send their competitors scurrying for cover? If any company can do it, it would be Apple. Intel could also knock their reputation for delays on the head as they move away from tick-tock.
Anyway, realistically, I think Kaby Lake will very much be in designers' minds. The machine will be wired for Kaby Lake from the beginning. Design/video/image folks will love the hardware acceleration. Version 1 will have Skylake with Kaby Lake coming on-stream as soon as feasible.
Another thing I really hope for is that they keep at least one classic USB 3.0 port - there are hundreds of thousands of different devices out there that rely on it, and having to carry around an adapter just to be able to plug in a flash drive at a colleague's desk would be super annoying. A lot more annoying actually than the whole display connector mess Apple has been through during the last ten years - I really hope they learned something from that.
I'm pretty sure the old USB connector will be ubiquitous for at least another 15 years because it is being used by peripherals that don't get replaced a lot, from expensive D/A Converters to musical instruments to medical and measuring equipment to computer peripherals to smartphone and camera connectors - well, pretty much every single electronic device out there these days. A missing classic USB 3.0 port on the MBP would probably be a deal breaker for me, unless I get a converter cable implanted somewhere so I'm sure to always have it around.
I am going to tell the truth I love my MB 12" I bought the other day. I really hope Apple does the same thinness for the 2016 rMBP's!
The question is about how thin they make it. If they make it too thin they straight up don't have the room for a legacy USB 3 port. I wouldn't be surprised at all if its all usb-c. I expect the HDMI port to die as well for the same reason sadly![]()
I hated the glowing Apple logo, it to me was too showy. @mjs402 I think it would be cool if to pack in a little more power and make it a hair thicker.I share your concerns, but they could still make it thinner by making it flat on the bottom. Or by going for a wedged design, like on the Air. Also the lid is a little thinner on the rMB I believe, where they got rid of the glowing apple.
Best thing could happen is Apple buying AMD (some rumours hint at that possibility, despite not being probable), now that Zen looks appealing. Why? (warning: vague personal and subjective impressions comming):
1. Apple would get rid of Intel dependency, but not in the sense of getting ARM Macs. That means anual updates with x86 CPUs on Macs, not this timing messed updates we are getting lastly (thanks Intel).
2. Intel would have to move his ass, now that there's a real competitor on the table. That means more improvements by Intel's side.
2. On Apple's side, we might see improvements on x86 CPUs due to custom designs, as they did with ARM.
Best thing could happen is Apple buying AMD (some rumours hint at that possibility, despite not being probable), now that Zen looks appealing. Why? (warning: vague personal and subjective impressions comming):
1. Apple would get rid of Intel dependency, but not in the sense of getting ARM Macs. That means anual updates with x86 CPUs on Macs, not this timing messed updates we are getting lastly (thanks Intel).
2. Intel would have to move his ass, now that there's a real competitor on the table. That means more improvements by Intel's side.
2. On Apple's side, we might see improvements on x86 CPUs due to custom designs, as they did with ARM.
I am with you brother, I only replace my laptop when apple replaces it for me for free through apple care. The first time it was a 2009 (3 times defective) Macbook and then a 2011 (also 3 times or more defective) Macbook Pro and then my current 2013 (has messed up about 5 or 6 times so far) Macbook Pro retina. So for me it's on average of about 2 and 1 half years until my laptops crap out and apple will replace it for me through my extended applecare plan/s. Technically they could have replaced my laptop today when I picked it up I pointed it out to them that it's been in for many repairs for my trackpad and they asked if I wanted a replacement I said no not yet, I'll give it another chance. I really meant let's hold off until 2016 skylake rMBP's.Ok, I think this is a valid question: you say moving to AMD would ensure annual updates, which assumes annual updates are even desirable.
Who really wants that? I mean, how many people honestly need a new computer every year, especially in 2016 when improvements are so marginally incremental across the board? Sure, there are tech addicts who buy a new MacBook or iPad every four months, but I would bet those people are extremely rare (maybe 200-300 in the world).
I plan to buy the next MBP, but I don't expect to replace it for 4-5 years. I know that's not a popular attitude in this forum (which unfortunately supports and enables tech addicts), but it's valid. Why should Apple cater to such a small minority of purchasers, those for whom yearly updates are useful?
I am with you brother, I only replace my laptop when apple replaces it for me for free through apple care. The first time it was a 2009 (3 times defective) Macbook and then a 2011 (also 3 times or more defective) Macbook Pro and then my current 2013 (has messed up about 5 or 6 times so far) Macbook Pro retina. So for me it's on average of about 2 and 1 half years until my laptops crap out and apple will replace it for me through my extended applecare plan/s. Technically they could have replaced my laptop today when I picked it up I pointed it out to them that it's been in for many repairs for my trackpad and they asked if I wanted a replacement I said no not yet, I'll give it another chance. I really meant let's hold off until 2016 skylake rMBP's.
2 and one more when skylake comes out. I always buy the extended 2 year extra Apple care plan. And the 2009 one I bought used from best buy for about 1,250 and now I have the 2013 rMBP 512gb. I'm mean I love my current one but the track pad keeps on messing up. They say when the battery which sits under it gets hot it expands and lifts up the track pad causing it to mess up. Cannot wait until skylake.wow seriously.
so you've not paid for a latpop since 2009 - how many free ones?
Another thing I really hope for is that they keep at least one classic USB 3.0 port - there are hundreds of thousands of different devices out there that rely on it, and having to carry around an adapter just to be able to plug in a flash drive at a colleague's desk would be super annoying. A lot more annoying actually than the whole display connector mess Apple has been through during the last ten years - I really hope they learned something from that.
I'm pretty sure the old USB connector will be ubiquitous for at least another 15 years because it is being used by peripherals that don't get replaced a lot, from expensive D/A Converters to musical instruments to medical and measuring equipment to computer peripherals to smartphone and camera connectors - well, pretty much every single electronic device out there these days. A missing classic USB 3.0 port on the MBP would probably be a deal breaker for me, unless I get a converter cable implanted somewhere so I'm sure to always have it around.
Ha ha ha! Best post ever.My rMBP is finally out of the shop yes. They replaced the logic board, I hope they put skylake in it by accident.
+1.Ok, I think this is a valid question: you say moving to AMD would ensure annual updates, which assumes annual updates are even desirable.
Who really wants that? I mean, how many people honestly need a new computer every year, especially in 2016 when improvements are so marginally incremental across the board? Sure, there are tech addicts who buy a new MacBook or iPad every four months, but I would bet those people are extremely rare (maybe 200-300 in the world).
I plan to buy the next MBP, but I don't expect to replace it for 4-5 years. I know that's not a popular attitude in this forum (which unfortunately supports and enables tech addicts), but it's valid. Why should Apple cater to such a small minority of purchasers, those for whom yearly updates are useful?