Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Guys I bought a macbook 12" 2015 model today from someone on craigslist. everything seemed to be working fine but then when I got home it was icloud locked, are there any ways to contact the original owner to give them back their laptop?

You're a really nice guy for the first thought being 'can I return this to the original owner' instead of 'wheres my money?!'

That aside...

really sorry for your situ, and you could always try contact apple for help, or ask the local law enforcement agency. I don't know if a laptop equivalent for checkmend exists but you could also try look up the S/N to see if it was reported lost or stolen.
 
Again, it's not just spending a whole bunch of money to upgrade my gear (which anyway I consider irresponsible on many levels, from a money perspective to an environmental perspective... My stuff still works great), but everyone around me (including public institutions) would have to follow as well...!
Labeling this as wishful thinking would be an understatement. I find it hard to buy a computer today (or in june) and not being able to use its full potential for 2-3 years, just because well, the world does not do what Apple wants it to do...
I hope I'm getting my message across... Still debati g what to do, although waiting a bit more seems the most reasonable thing to do.

This hits the nail on the head. The new MBP must have TB3/USB-C but I will be astonished if it doesn't feature at least one standard USB port.

This is not like the floppy disk situation. If one excludes TB1/2 and Firewire devices, virtually every peripheral device for the last decade has used USB. Today, in 2016, virtually every external HDD still ships with a standard USB connection and cable. Nearly every person who has bought an external HDD in the last 5 years will expect to be able to just plug it in. Apple has made it crystal clear in recent years that the mass market and not the pro market is their priority.

I am one of those people - mainly due to a love of photography - who is always wanting faster and better cables and monitors. I want TB3 and USB-C in everything and as soon as possible. But given that the two best smart phones in the world are not using USB-C (Samsung using micro-USB for another year at least - and for phones that will be used for a few years at least by most users) and Apple using lightning, it is slow going for USB-C to catch on and will be something that takes a number of years. It (with TB3) is clearly the future for high end - just as Firewire and TB1/2 were and hopefully USB-C will catch on at the lower end - but this is a process that will take a few years at least. In the meantime every single thing that can be plugged in to a computer will be using standard USB. The cables are there in every house, they work fast enough for 99% of people in 99% of situations (and Apple is going after the mass market these days which *always* values convenience ahead of performance - look at the fate of TB1/2). The cables -standard USB and/or micro-USB - can be used with the vast majority (I would guess something like 95%+) of smartphones, external power packs, printers, USB battery chargers, bluetooth headphones, USB charging torches, and perhaps most crucially external HDDs. They are shipping with those devices today in 2016 - in devices that people will buy and realistically expect to be using in 2017, 2018 and 2019.

As I said I would be very happy if tomorrow everyone agreed to move to TB3, bought new cables, got the prices coming down and choices going up. But it won't just happen like that. In many respects USB has been a victim of its own success. USB3 is more than enough for most people and has the same form factor as the USB standard that has worked with all peripherals for over a decade. It would be astonishing, and likely a large commercial error, for Apple to not include those standard ports on the next generation. Imagine millions of people suddenly being told they have to buy an adapter, a hub or a new cable to use quite literally any device and/or peripheral they have bought or will buy this year to even plug it into their new MBP. We could tell them again and again about the improved performance but the mass market isn't like that - hence Samsung sticking with micro-USB for another year. I just don't see Apple taking such a risky decision that would inconvenience and annoy greatly something like 99% of their customers even if part of me wishes they would.
 
Less weight thinner better gpu, better battery life, better ports 4k@60 hz, better speakers, better keyboard backlit
Less weight thinner better gpu, better battery life, better ports 4k@60 hz, better speakers, better keyboard backlit

Considering the 12.9" IPP pro has a higher ppi than the rMB and rMBP...we might see more pixels...maybe even 4K.

Thinner bezels.

Magic Keyboard style keyboard with individual led-lit keys. Better speaker system...IPP 4 speaker system maybe.

Larger trackpad like the rMB.

Terraced batteries...12 hour battery life?

USB C/TB3

MagSafe 3/IPP Smart connector possibility.

Smaller logic board = more batttery.

Slightly thinner...lighter as Serban said.

A technology that perhaps Apple has kept hidden from us till now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dydegu
Considering the 12.9" IPP pro has a higher ppi than the rMB and rMBP...we might see more pixels...maybe even 4K.

Thinner bezels.

Magic Keyboard style keyboard with individual led-lit keys. Better speaker system...IPP 4 speaker system maybe.

Larger trackpad like the rMB.

Terraced batteries...12 hour battery life?

USB C/TB3

MagSafe 3/IPP Smart connector possibility.

Smaller logic board = more batttery.

Slightly thinner...lighter as Serban said.

A technology that perhaps Apple has kept hidden from us till now.

You forgot the slot to take my money
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dydegu
Has anyone ever waited in line for a new roller coaster? Everyone in line gets so tired at the end, but the more time you wait the more committed you become. Maybe the ride stops for a while and everyone gets really frustrated because they thought they were getting on earlier (even though that was probably unrealistic) and now they have to wait.

Then you get to where you can see people getting on, and some guy looks at his watch and says, "Well, I've waited for two hours in this damn line, and I won't wait another minute." And then they walk out, and you realize someone just wasted two hours of their life for absolutely nothing, even though they could have waited another ten minutes and gotten on.

Come on guys, at least wait until WWDC when the 2015's will be heavily discounted to make way for the Skylake ones.
 
I don't think I can wait any longer.

oqZf4Pd.png
 

Attachments

  • Dave-Chappelle.png
    Dave-Chappelle.png
    291.5 KB · Views: 112
Last edited:
This hits the nail on the head. The new MBP must have TB3/USB-C but I will be astonished if it doesn't feature at least one standard USB port.

This is not like the floppy disk situation. If one excludes TB1/2 and Firewire devices, virtually every peripheral device for the last decade has used USB. Today, in 2016, virtually every external HDD still ships with a standard USB connection and cable. Nearly every person who has bought an external HDD in the last 5 years will expect to be able to just plug it in. Apple has made it crystal clear in recent years that the mass market and not the pro market is their priority.

I am one of those people - mainly due to a love of photography - who is always wanting faster and better cables and monitors. I want TB3 and USB-C in everything and as soon as possible. But given that the two best smart phones in the world are not using USB-C (Samsung using micro-USB for another year at least - and for phones that will be used for a few years at least by most users) and Apple using lightning, it is slow going for USB-C to catch on and will be something that takes a number of years. It (with TB3) is clearly the future for high end - just as Firewire and TB1/2 were and hopefully USB-C will catch on at the lower end - but this is a process that will take a few years at least. In the meantime every single thing that can be plugged in to a computer will be using standard USB. The cables are there in every house, they work fast enough for 99% of people in 99% of situations (and Apple is going after the mass market these days which *always* values convenience ahead of performance - look at the fate of TB1/2). The cables -standard USB and/or micro-USB - can be used with the vast majority (I would guess something like 95%+) of smartphones, external power packs, printers, USB battery chargers, bluetooth headphones, USB charging torches, and perhaps most crucially external HDDs. They are shipping with those devices today in 2016 - in devices that people will buy and realistically expect to be using in 2017, 2018 and 2019.

As I said I would be very happy if tomorrow everyone agreed to move to TB3, bought new cables, got the prices coming down and choices going up. But it won't just happen like that. In many respects USB has been a victim of its own success. USB3 is more than enough for most people and has the same form factor as the USB standard that has worked with all peripherals for over a decade. It would be astonishing, and likely a large commercial error, for Apple to not include those standard ports on the next generation. Imagine millions of people suddenly being told they have to buy an adapter, a hub or a new cable to use quite literally any device and/or peripheral they have bought or will buy this year to even plug it into their new MBP. We could tell them again and again about the improved performance but the mass market isn't like that - hence Samsung sticking with micro-USB for another year. I just don't see Apple taking such a risky decision that would inconvenience and annoy greatly something like 99% of their customers even if part of me wishes they would.

1/10

That is the least convincing, long-winded argument for tacking on a legacy USB port (and ruining the design) I have read on this entire thread.

Is buying a USB-C to USB-legacy connector/cable too much to ask of you?

Oh, and I see the "tradition" argument rearing its illogical head again. Why do you think Apple cares about your weird, low performance workflow and your external hard drive over USB-2 (presumably you have 4TB over USB-2... Lol)? Apple MBP is for pros, not people who seek to keep doing things they way they were doing them 10 years ago because that's the way they've always done things.
 
Is there any chance Apple is skipping Skylake for the MBP and gets the first Kaby Lake chips from Intel? "Kaby Lake is scheduled to launch in the second half of 2016"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oppenheim
Is there any chance Apple is skipping Skylake for the MBP and gets the first Kaby Lake chips from Intel? "Kaby Lake is scheduled to launch in the second half of 2016"

Nope
[doublepost=1461658027][/doublepost]
1/10

That is the least convincing, long-winded argument for tacking on a legacy USB port (and ruining the design) I have read on this entire thread.

Is buying a USB-C to USB-legacy connector/cable too much to ask of you?

Oh, and I see the "tradition" argument rearing its illogical head again. Why do you think Apple cares about your weird, low performance workflow and your external hard drive over USB-2 (presumably you have 4TB over USB-2... Lol)? Apple MBP is for pros, not people who seek to keep doing things they way they were doing them 10 years ago because that's the way they've always done things.

...Explain to me once more what's the big deal if Apple decide to put both the USB-A and USB-C in the MBP?
Too many mm thickness that would "ruin the design"?
Oh gosh! No!
a99176f17f98d40c567bce80a2707a2090dddb5e93468bca673bcc1b69c4ecf8.jpg


And by the way, Apple cares so much about the futuristic Pro users that none of its computers support TB3.
 
...Explain to me once more what's the big deal if Apple decide to put both the USB-A and USB-C in the MBP?
Too many mm thickness that would "ruin the design"?

Yes. It would ruin the design.

It's also pointless, because USB-C is compatible with USB-A.
 
Is there any chance Apple is skipping Skylake for the MBP and gets the first Kaby Lake chips from Intel? "Kaby Lake is scheduled to launch in the second half of 2016"
The i5's/i7's Apple probably will be using in the next MBP was "launched" in September 2015. They're still not available.
 
Considering the 12.9" IPP pro has a higher ppi than the rMB and rMBP...we might see more pixels...maybe even 4K.

Thinner bezels.

Magic Keyboard style keyboard with individual led-lit keys. Better speaker system...IPP 4 speaker system maybe.

Larger trackpad like the rMB.

Terraced batteries...12 hour battery life?

USB C/TB3

MagSafe 3/IPP Smart connector possibility.

Smaller logic board = more batttery.

Slightly thinner...lighter as Serban said.

A technology that perhaps Apple has kept hidden from us till now.
not a chance for higher ppi, because will affect the performance, and in the mbp we need performance
 
Not interested in a higher ppi screen. Also not really interested in what kind of ports the MBP will have, as long as it's more than one.
 
Is there any chance Apple is skipping Skylake for the MBP and gets the first Kaby Lake chips from Intel? "Kaby Lake is scheduled to launch in the second half of 2016"

I would hope so. All the features of kabylake seem to be a perfect fit for the MBP (even lower power, even more integrated graphics for driving 5k displays, on-chip Thunderbolt3/USB-C capabilities, the audio-video encoding/decoding capabilities - important target market for Apple, 3D XPoint, etc.)

If they can't get the silicon in time or can't justify delaying the machine even further, I am sure the Apple designers have this chip in mind. Though knowing Apple, they may delay the whole machine if it means having these killer features and being first to market with Kabylake. By the time the new MBP comes out, Apple could be a year behind competitors who released Skylake in 2015.
 
not a chance for higher ppi, because will affect the performance, and in the mbp we need performance
that's exactly why current mbp have 1024x768 displays.
stepping up from 800x600 had a huge impact on performance, i wish they kept the lower resolution.
 
not a chance for higher ppi, because will affect the performance, and in the mbp we need performance

Valid point. But think of it this way: the rMBP wont be redesigned in another 4 years (2020)...and by then 227 ppi will be considered outdated. Remember that Apple needs to future proof this for the next 4 incoming years. At this point most competitors have delivered better screens than Apple. MS Surface Book has 267 ppi, similar viewing angles, 1700:1 contrast ratio, 100% sRGB color calibration.

And I doubt Apple will feel satisfied with the IPP having a higher ppi than their flagship computer, the rMBP.

So I expect the rMBP to get to the IPP 264 ppi...or reach 4K (282 ppi). Most likely the first option though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StandardFlint
I would hope so. All the features of kabylake seem to be a perfect fit for the MBP (even lower power, even more integrated graphics for driving 5k displays, on-chip Thunderbolt3/USB-C capabilities, the audio-video encoding/decoding capabilities - important target market for Apple, 3D XPoint, etc.)

If they can't get the silicon in time or can't justify delaying the machine even further, I am sure the Apple designers have this chip in mind. Though knowing Apple, they may delay the whole machine if it means having these killer features and being first to market with Kabylake. By the time the new MBP comes out, Apple could be a year behind competitors who released Skylake in 2015.

Big surprise that forthcoming technology is a good fit for a top of the line product?
The way you think they should never release anything as there will be something better in the coming months or years.
 
Valid point. But think of it this way: the rMBP wont be redesigned in another 4 years (2020)...and by then 227 ppi will be considered outdated. Remember that Apple needs to future proof this for the next 4 incoming.

And I doubt Apple will feel satisfied with the IPP having a higher ppi than their flagship computer, the rMBP.

So I expect the rMBP to get to the IPP 264 ppi...or reach 4K (282 ppi). Most likely the first option though.
You've forgotten that Apple defines the resolution needed for a "Retina" screen dependent on the device and how far away from your face you use it. The rMBP doesn't need to match the iPP PPI, as you won't hold it as close to your face. See a pattern here?

- iPhone 6s plus = 401 PPI
- iPad Mini = 324 PPI
- iPad Pro = 264 PPI
- Macbook Pro Retina = 227 PPI
- iMac 5k = 218 PPI
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pbrutto
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.