Man, I just watched a few reviews of the Dell XPS 13 Skylake model. I'm very tempted to get this instead of waiting, but I want to see if the new MBP redesign will match the tiny bezels and weight of the XPS.
aptX is not lossless. It's just marketed to be as 'transparent' as a lossless codec (and marketed pretty well to the point where many people believe it's lossless when it's not). See http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good-is-bluetooth-audio-at-its-best , one of the very few proper measurements on the performance of aptX. aptX is also not unarguably better than SBC either; it gets full spectrum representation at the expense of added phase noise.
In any case, a real pro or a real audiophile would rather use an external USB DAC over the 3.5 mm port or bluetooth anyways, so they'd not really care whether the 3.5 mm jack is there or not.
Man, I just watched a few reviews of the Dell XPS 13 Skylake model. I'm very tempted to get this instead of waiting, but I want to see if the new MBP redesign will match the tiny bezels and weight of the XPS.
unless you're streaming 4k video, i can't believe that a simple youtube page would put the laptop you mentioned under pressure. but i don't have that machine and i must take what you say for real.
unless you're streaming 4k video, i can't believe that a simple youtube page would put the laptop you mentioned under pressure. but i don't have that machine and i must take what you say for real.
i'd be worried, as this shouldn't be a normal behavior, check on activity monitor if there is something unusual.
I believe it. My 17" 2010 cannot play 1080p full screen flash or HTML5 nor a single 4K MP4 straight from an ssd (dropped frames everywhere), yet I can boot camp to do all the above at the same time without a hiccup. I know the machine is vintage according to Apple but Windows has always been a nicer when it came to decoding.
[...]
[...]
0 chance of Apple matching that bezel thickness or should I say thinness. Bezels will most likely be rMB 2015/16 thick/thin.
[doublepost=1462175786][/doublepost]Now for my USD 0.02:
I was thinking and well...thinking some more, and what I thought up is the following. The rMB is like an iDevice that offers OS X. It even has the steel logo, multiple color variants, thin/portability, one port for charging. Maybe Apple plans to keep this thing underpowered forever, and maybe it will retain a single port forever, unlike the Air which slowly got more ports.
I feel the rMBP will only come in one colour, be slightly thinner than the current rMBP, retain the glowing Apple logo, will have multiple ports and potentially magnetic chargin (Smart Connecto?).
By doing this, apple can differentiate their product line better.
Okay thats it, im done![]()
Everyone keeps talking about USB-C only being problematic, but nobody's talking specifics. How will it affect YOU?
0 chance of Apple matching that bezel thickness or should I say thinness. Bezels will most likely be rMB 2015/16 thick/thin.
[doublepost=1462175786][/doublepost]Now for my USD 0.02:
I was thinking and well...thinking some more, and what I thought up is the following. The rMB is like an iDevice that offers OS X. It even has the steel logo, multiple color variants, thin/portability, one port for charging. Maybe Apple plans to keep this thing underpowered forever, and maybe it will retain a single port forever, unlike the Air which slowly got more ports.
I feel the rMBP will only come in one colour, be slightly thinner than the current rMBP, retain the glowing Apple logo, will have multiple ports and potentially magnetic chargin (Smart Connecto?).
By doing this, apple can differentiate their product line better.
Okay thats it, im done![]()
Foreal? I always blame my asthmatic iGPU for not being able to play 1080p or over on my 2010 13" MBP - do you know how OS X and Windows differ in the way the handle video decoding that causes such a difference in performance?
optical capabilities of the MBP audio jack
Wow. My MBP was from Late 2012 so mine wouldn't have had it, but that's great to know.
I sure hope the new ones keep this feature!
Mmm still no rumors ........
Interesting observation. Maybe they'll take it a step further and make the rMB the first arm based OS X machine.
And how do you handle the different OSX software stack, and all the third party binaries?Moving over to ARM architecture is a huge possibility. I think with A9X reaching clock speeds of 2.26 GHz, Apple's reached the capability of Intel Core M processors. Maybe we'll see an A10X in the 2017 Retina MacBook. I feel ARM MacBooks and Intel MacBook Pros is another great point for differentiation.