Like take out the back light in the keyboard, take out all ports including hdmi, aux (3.5mm), and even the trackpad and they'll have everything by mind powers.there's pretty much a guarantee there will be compromises to make it slimmer.
Like take out the back light in the keyboard, take out all ports including hdmi, aux (3.5mm), and even the trackpad and they'll have everything by mind powers.there's pretty much a guarantee there will be compromises to make it slimmer.
Bless you for blessing him. Bless both of you.Bless you, man.Most? You'd be in the minority with that opinion.
If you want something thinner, get a rMB or MBA, perhaps the rumored 15" models will be released at wwdc. I'm here for performance on the go.
Oh sure. I believe so as well. But if these compromises lead to a product I don't like to use, than I'm out.there's pretty much a guarantee there will be compromises to make it slimmer.
Hm, you're right. My bad. For some reason I thought 13" only include i7 like 15" but they do use i5 as well.Where do you get that there is only one 28W Skylake? I see 4 28W Skylake with Iris 550 on Intel ARK and you can already get the Vaio Z flip in 2 processor options, i5 and i7.
That is the funniest reply I've ever read on macrumors.comDunning and Kruger want to have a word with you.
Just a thought:
What if Apple would replace all ports with 4 USB-C ports and supply every MacBook Pro with a multiport adapter?
A lot of people in here are afraid of/ don't want Apple changing the ports, but would you be happy if you got a free adapter? (not saying this is happening, but if)
I use USB A sometimes, and it would be nice to have an adapter for those times, Apple could use USB-C without me worrying.
**** Apple.
My point is that most MBP buyers will rather have a very thin and light 15" MBP with very long battery life than a thicker and heavier MBP with a quad-core CPU that is rarely beneficial and with a faster iGPU. I personally would like to have a thin and light 15" MBP but I would rather have at least the HD580 iGPU. I know it would be really bad for the power users if Apple decided to drop both the dGPU and quad-cores from their most powerful laptop but I just wanted to share my thoughts with you guys.
We've discussed iGPU vs dGPU, we've also discussed the possibility of a 15W CPU in the 13" but what about a 28W CPU in the 15"? I've been thinking a lot about this lately. Apple would be able to make very thin MacBooks by using 28W CPU:s instead of the current 47W.
If we assume that the next 15" will drop the dGPU option (just an assumption), then the 28W vs 45W is basically a dual-core + HD550 vs quad-core + HD580. For GPU performance, the HD580 is going to outperform the HD550 but what exactly is the practical benefit of a quad-core CPU? Of course multi-threaded applications will be able to take advantage of the quad-core but what kind of applications are these? AFAIK quad-cores will not matter for video editing, photo editing or 3D rendering because these can be done a lot faster and more efficient using the iGPU. I doubt even games can benefit a lot from quad-cores because the GPU will be the limiting factor and benchmarks have shown that GPU:s are more important than CPU:s when it comes to gaming. Even web browsing isn't much faster on the quad-cores because internet speed is the limiting factor most of the time.
My point is that most MBP buyers will rather have a very thin and light 15" MBP with very long battery life than a thicker and heavier MBP with a quad-core CPU that is rarely beneficial and with a faster iGPU. I personally would like to have a thin and light 15" MBP but I would rather have at least the HD580 iGPU. I know it would be really bad for the power users if Apple decided to drop both the dGPU and quad-cores from their most powerful laptop but I just wanted to share my thoughts with you guys.
I've seen a lot of people here wanting the 13" MBP to have a quad-core CPU, what are your reasons / use cases?
This thread makes me drink more. Who's with me!?
This thread makes me drink more. Who's with me!?
All this hype, you guys make it out to be like the new MBPr will cure deadliest diseases.
Smaller machine = less shipping costs. The kind of micro-optimizations that a Tim Cook style CEO lives for.
If blablabla rancorous words
Bless you for blessing him. Bless both of you.
Count me in, my friend!
Not deadliest, but surely this wait is a disease.
And do not forget that many people here have a MBP from 2009/2010/2011.
They will see a lot of improvement.
What you want my friend is a MacBook Air. The Pro losing Quad Cores... and I am gone!
I don't care about all the other things. I am also a hardcore Mac user and I loathe Windows. The reason I bought my 2011 17" MBP were the new Sandy Bridge Quads. Dual Core in a pro-level machine is absolutely laughable.
********.But Skylake/Kabylake cores ... and are coupled increasingly tightly to the proprietary Intel compiler to get the best performance.
I do what I want. Get over yourself. I am NOT the one to try. Understand that.
That means go try to talk down to someone else. Not happening with me. He obviously has insecurity issues.