You're triggering him. Stawp it!!1You said something that was objectively incorrect. Someone told you that you were incorrect. It's ok.
My guess is there will be at least an up to date display (not resolution, quality) and better speakers (the current MBP ones are really bad). Also maybe a bit of weight reduction. If Apple is feeling bold, they will add the butterfly keyboard design. Design will probably only be slightly tweakedAll this hype, you guys make it out to be like the new MBPr will cure deadliest diseases.
Reality is, it will just get a 10% performance bump, new TB3 and slightly lighter with an extra hour of battery. Maybe a choice of colours. The 15" will just get another slightly less garbage dGPU.
I can't wait to read all your disappointed comments in 36 days.
Haven't you heard?My guess is there will be at least an up to date display (not resolution, quality) and better speakers (the current MBP ones are really bad). Also maybe a bit of weight reduction. If Apple is feeling bold, they will add the butterfly keyboard design. Design will probably only be slightly tweaked
You said something that was objectively incorrect. Someone told you that you were incorrect. It's ok.
What you posted was factually incorrect. Also you posted it in a manner that might have started a flame (i. e. you've not only stated a false fact but also projected consequences as if this fact has been true). And being members of this thread for quite a while we all know for sure your misinformation has been spit before and quite recently, you're not the first (and not even the second).Correcting someone and telling someone to stop posting are two very different things. It's okay, you're not the only one who lacks common sense.
[doublepost=1462718230][/doublepost]I will say whatever I want within the rules. No profanity or hate. With that said, that man was not simply correcting, he was belittling.
Every single one of you know I am right, but you can't side with the new guy. God forbid we all act like adults.
What you posted was factually incorrect. Also you posted it in a manner that might have started a flame (i. e. you've not only stated a false fact but also projected consequences as if this fact has been true). And being members of this thread for quite a while we all know for sure your misinformation has been spit before and quite recently, you're not the first (and not even the second).
So let's count.
You've shown disrespect to the community stating the false fact without checking your information first.
You've flooded the thread.
You've been spotted in a flame-like behaviour.
And you've done it even though recently it has been shown your words are false. I hope you've done it unintentionally.
Moreover instead of thanking the person who provided you the info you started arguing.
@Exile714 response was proportionate and right. You should've agreed with you being at fault, read the info graciously provided and return to the community as a useful member. You've started arguing being in the wrong. No one refused your right to post forever. Everyone was just trying to prevent flood, flame and false facts.
Other people sided with the right side.
I hope now you will change your behaviour.
P. S. Look at me. I was wrong no earlier than previous page. Instead of saying "I say what I want" I've just said "My bad!".
That is so sad, scary in that I have been wondering the same thing and I need a new MBP NOW! and will not buy last yrs( outdated when it was released) refresh.Any clues about next generation after skylake? I have a feeling that Apple is going to skip this generation as well.
You understand that what happens now is flame and it has been started by your initial post and then your inappropriate reaction to @Exile714 informative response?You can't be serious? Starting a flame?! Flooding?! You either have the wrong person or you're insane. Check my post history...
[doublepost=1462720045][/doublepost]Oh and change my behavior? LMAO!!
So minding my business and posting my thoughts are a problem? Or is it defending myself from an insecure weirdo who attacked me for no reason?
This place is ridiculous. Mods, please close my account. Thank you.
Any clues about next generation after skylake? I have a feeling that Apple is going to skip this generation as well.
I'm with you! I think I have spent enough on Crown Royal Res. to buy a new MBP since we started waiting for this UnicornThis thread makes me drink more. Who's with me!?
We've discussed iGPU vs dGPU, we've also discussed the possibility of a 15W CPU in the 13" but what about a 28W CPU in the 15"? I've been thinking a lot about this lately. Apple would be able to make very thin MacBooks by using 28W CPU:s instead of the current 47W.
If we assume that the next 15" will drop the dGPU option (just an assumption), then the 28W vs 45W is basically a dual-core + HD550 vs quad-core + HD580. For GPU performance, the HD580 is going to outperform the HD550 but what exactly is the practical benefit of a quad-core CPU? Of course multi-threaded applications will be able to take advantage of the quad-core but what kind of applications are these? AFAIK quad-cores will not matter for video editing, photo editing or 3D rendering because these can be done a lot faster and more efficient using the iGPU. I doubt even games can benefit a lot from quad-cores because the GPU will be the limiting factor and benchmarks have shown that GPU:s are more important than CPU:s when it comes to gaming. Even web browsing isn't much faster on the quad-cores because internet speed is the limiting factor most of the time.
My point is that most MBP buyers will rather have a very thin and light 15" MBP with very long battery life than a thicker and heavier MBP with a quad-core CPU that is rarely beneficial and with a faster iGPU. I personally would like to have a thin and light 15" MBP but I would rather have at least the HD580 iGPU. I know it would be really bad for the power users if Apple decided to drop both the dGPU and quad-cores from their most powerful laptop but I just wanted to share my thoughts with you guys.
I've seen a lot of people here wanting the 13" MBP to have a quad-core CPU, what are your reasons / use cases?
I agree with you and have said the same thing at least twenty times on this thread.Yes, its not gonna happen. I've seen plenty of laptop manufacturers include adapters, Apple is not one of them. The rMB includes one f*cking USB-C port and they STILL didn't include an adapter.
Agreed.
lol wut? Why are you buying a 15" rMBP when you want an Air? What proof do you have that 15" users want thinner and lighter on an already thin and light machine over performance?
All this hype, you guys make it out to be like the new MBPr will cure deadliest diseases.
Reality is, it will just get a 10% performance bump, new TB3 and slightly lighter with an extra hour of battery. Maybe a choice of colours. The 15" will just get another slightly less garbage dGPU.
I can't wait to read all your disappointed comments in 36 days.
"Every single one of you know I am right"
You can't be serious? Starting a flame?! Flooding?! You either have the wrong person or you're insane. Check my post history...
[doublepost=1462720045][/doublepost]Oh and change my behavior? LMAO!!
So minding my business and posting my thoughts are a problem? Or is it defending myself from an insecure weirdo who attacked me for no reason?
This place is ridiculous. Mods, please close my account. Thank you.
This place is ridiculous. Mods, please close my account. Thank you.
What's going on in here?
What you posted was factually incorrect. Also you posted it in a manner that might have started a flame (i. e. you've not only stated a false fact but also projected consequences as if this fact has been true). And being members of this thread for quite a while we all know for sure your misinformation has been spit before and quite recently, you're not the first (and not even the second).
So let's count.
You've shown disrespect to the community stating the false fact without checking your information first.
You've flooded the thread.
You've been spotted in a flame-like behaviour.
And you've done it even though recently it has been shown your words are false. I hope you've done it unintentionally.
Moreover instead of thanking the person who provided you the info you started arguing.
@Exile714 response was proportionate and right. You should've agreed with you being at fault, read the info graciously provided and return to the community as a useful member. You've started arguing being in the wrong. No one refused your right to post forever. Everyone was just trying to prevent flood, flame and false facts.
Other people sided with the right side.
I hope now you will change your behaviour. Not because I or anyone say you so, I have no authority over you. But because this is the right thing to do.
P. S. Look at me. I was wrong no earlier than previous page. Instead of saying "I say what I want" I've just said "My bad!".
Serban is baeApple will not skip Skylake 100%. They are testing this chips internally for 3 months now
Apple will not skip Skylake 100%. They are testing this chips internally for 3 months now
[ 1] 0x191e0000 - Intel® HD Graphics 515..........(ULX GT2)
[ 2] 0x19160000 - Intel® HD Graphics 520..........(ULT GT2)
[ 3] 0x19260000 - Intel® Iris™ Graphics 550.......(ULT GT3) rMBP 13 ?
[ 4] 0x191b0000 - Intel® HD Graphics 530..........(Halo GT2)
[ 5] 0x193b0000 - Intel® Iris™ Pro Graphics 580...(Halo GT4)
[ 6] 0x19120000 - Intel® HD Graphics 530..........(Desktop GT2)
[ 7] 0x19020001 - Intel® HD Graphics 510..........(Desktop GT1)
[ 8] 0x19170001 - Skylake Desktop.................(GT1.5)
[ 9] 0x19120001 - Intel® HD Graphics 530..........(Desktop GT2)
[10] 0x19320001 - Skylake Desktop.................(GT4)
[11] 0x19160002 - Intel® HD Graphics 520..........(ULT GT2)
[12] 0x19260002 - Intel® Iris™ Graphics 540.......(ULT GT3)
[13] 0x191e0003 - Intel® HD Graphics 515..........(ULX GT2)
[14] 0x19260004 - Intel® Iris™ Graphics 540.......(ULT GT3)
[15] 0x193b0005 - Intel® Iris™ Pro Graphics 580...(Halo GT4) rMBP 15" ?
[16] 0x193b0006 - Intel® Iris™ Pro Graphics 580...(Halo GT4)
our test protot, are the base model, so not sure if they can include or cant a dgpu. we cant open them to see the space insideSerban, do you know anything about the dGPU situation in the 15?