This varies wildly by the court and/or government body, possibly by department. My career involves a lot of signatures, and sometimes digital signatures are allowed, sometimes not. But it has nothing to do with the ability to use an Apple pencil or not.
You can sign an actual piece of paper and capture it in preview, there are capacitive styluses now that would allow you to do this in real-time on your mac, and there are apps such as Docusign that allow the same thing. Digital signatures simply aren't new in any sense of the word. They weren't new when Apple added them to Preview.
You literally joined today. Let's not pretend you have a clue of what you're talking about.
This.
You get that with a regular pencil as well.
It doesn't mean i read this thread from a long time, if i joined today i would not say that
You still don't have a clue about me, or what my posts are "always" like. Digital signatures are not new. Saying so isn't disdainful, it's just stating a fact.
I am just saying what i here what that will be in the future for macos and the pencil. Live streaming documents for digital signature by hand is not allowed in court for now because is not a big deal at this moment,like the rules for autonome cars doesnt exist because there are not mainstream,mercedes e class force you by law to touch your steering wheel from time to time.
Actually everything before Nehalem since it brings QPI/hyper threading/turbo boost. The 2009 Mac Pro should be included.
Though to be fair, I'm not sure what bloggers/reporters are supposed to do. Perhaps not cover it, or add in more disclosure about the lack of verification? I went to the source (http://research.kgi.com.tw/KGI1/index.htm), and all of their content (such as Kuo's report) is behind a paywall.
Subscriptions to securities reports like these are usually very very costly, and they work very hard to make sure that people can't just get their information for free. There's a reason that the report isn't readily available on the internet.
