Intel Comet Lake drivers just leaked on Linux. Now we get 8 cores for the 45W chips and 6 cores for 28W!
Still based on 14nm though right? It'll be interesting to see how that compares to Sunny Cove.
Intel Comet Lake drivers just leaked on Linux. Now we get 8 cores for the 45W chips and 6 cores for 28W!
Still based on 14nm though right? It'll be interesting to see how that compares to Sunny Cove.
The 2018 specifically doesn't use "top-end laptop chips", it uses a desktop CPU and finally provided a solution for those who want a high cpu/memory configuration without crazy dual quadraphonic cross stitched GPUs like the Mac Pro and iMac Pro have 'forced' for several years now.Similar to 2018 Mini. Uses top-end laptop chips.
They're less common still but definitely available. Heck I found a SanDisk one with both connectors on it, and it's tiny.nor usb C sticks yet
Comet Lake is indeed on 14nm, but with some minor tweaks and optimization to reduce power consumption. Interestingly, Comet Lake also includes a quad-core 5W chips for the regular 12-inch MacBooks.
Sunny Cove will definitely improve IPC and include larger cache, but high power chips won’t be ready until late 2020 or early 2021. Intel will probably start off with 5-15W chips which are not really suitable for MacBooks. Apple also has the tendency to use faster GTe3 iGPU for the 13 inch models which will take even longer to release....
I'd be more worried about that ominous red line going down the eastern side of the Atlantic, if that's your take on this..Good god! That banana is bigger than Brazil!
I bought a 2018 MBP last year but I was this close to going with an XPS or another good windows laptop for a while since they are just offering such a good value for a much lower price compared to the MBP.I’m refusing to buy one for reliability reasons alone.
Double shame that Apple drove up pricing in the whole market and then kept upwards to continue to differentiate themselves.
Now, you have extreme pricing and high failure rates. I wouldn’t pay for that even if it was cheap.
The funny thing about reliability is that you only find out how long a laptop will last by using it for that time frame.a lot of people will be fine with just an reliable model that can last 5+ years
I bought a 2018 MBP last year but I was this close to going with an XPS or another good windows laptop for a while since they are just offering such a good value for a much lower price compared to the MBP.
A decade ago, Apple's laptops where the best-in-class – they may have been, say, 20% more expensive, but therefore they were about 50% better in a lot of areas than almost anything else on the market, roughly speaking. They weren't completely devoid of issues, but still much more issue-free and reliable than a lot of other machines – you paid more, but it was easy to pinpoint what you were getting for it. Nowadays, you pay like 40-50% more than for other laptops with comparable specs, and you get like 10-20% more out of it in some areas, and even a little less in others (e.g. the keyboard with its high failure rates, or the fact that many comparable laptops have a 4K display nowadays)?
I mean, I get it – the big advantage is macOS, and that's also one of the main reasons why I have a 2018 MBP sitting here right now and not an equivalent Windows one. But from a pure hardware-perspective, what are you getting for the heavy price-up over competitors? The trackpad is still leagues ahead of the competition, okay, but other than that, the differences have been getting smaller and smaller over the years, whereas the price difference (and failure rate, at least since a few years) has become larger and larger.
Your post nails it.
In 2008 I got a Dell and my wife got a MacBook. The Dell died in its first year and was repaired under warranty. It died permanently a few years later. The MacBook is still daily driven to this day.
Then there’s the fact that the unibody construction was miles better and the screen contrast was also an order of magnitude better. The Dell looked like it had vellum paper glued to the screen.
Your percentages seem right on. Previously, you paid a chunk more and the benefits were easy to identify. There was still real value despite the higher price. Now, it seems like you’re paying an even bigger markup just for the privilege of macOS.
Apple didn’t make 16 GB the default until the 2014 15 inch model, so, you probably won’t see that until 2020 if at all. I would hope with the 16 inch config, they would make it default. But, with Apple, you probably would have to pay near or $3,000 for it.The best I could hope for is that one of the standard models gets 32GB RAM. Those models get deep discounts here in Belgium, but the BTO models stay around the Apple price. That makes a 32GB upgrade around €1000 for me, not the official €480![]()
Apple didn’t make 16 GB the default until the 2014 15 inch model, so, you probably won’t see that until 2020 if at all. I would hope with the 16 inch config, they would make it default. But, with Apple, you probably would have to pay near or $3,000 for it.
I think that's the key here - if they want to charge £2,349 price of admission, fine. But for that at least give us vaguely the specs you'd expect from a two and a half thousand pound computer. A 256GB SSD for nearly two and a half grand? Seriously? You want to up it to a somewhat more reasonable 512GB, and it's another £180 and you have to BTO, or, you have to go for the £2,700 model with questionable CPU clock speed upgrades also built in - what? It's like the 16GB iPhone 6s again, they try to get away with it until it becomes absolutely outrageous. Hell, if they even iPhone 6s'd the storage tiers and gave you 1TB in the higher tier model or for an extra ~£200 that would be something at least.It's just a joke these days, Apple is literally milking us dry. I've no problem with a high entry price as long as the value is present as my notebooks are working systems and pay for themselves. I do know one thing the upcoming MBP better be ****ing spectacular.
Unfortunately I've a feeling that I'm pissing into the wind, as all we'll get is another FarceBook...
Q-6
Legit i wonder?!
I think that's the key here - if they want to charge £2,349 price of admission, fine. But for that at least give us vaguely the specs you'd expect from a two and a half thousand pound computer. A 256GB SSD for nearly two and a half grand? Seriously? You want to up it to a somewhat more reasonable 512GB, and it's another £180 and you have to BTO, or, you have to go for the £2,700 model with questionable CPU clock speed upgrades also built in - what? It's like the 16GB iPhone 6s again, they try to get away with it until it becomes absolutely outrageous. Hell, if they even iPhone 6s'd the storage tiers and gave you 1TB in the higher tier model or for an extra ~£200 that would be something at least.
I'm on a 2012 MBP and in the market for an upgrade. Gonna go ahead and wait for WWDC to see what happens. Really hoping for a 16" upgrade. Something that's not just a moderate upgrade. All the reviews of the 2016-2018 MBP's have been pretty underwhelming and for that price I really need something amazing that I'm going to love and that will last me another 6-8 years. (My personal upgrade cycle). I do iOS Development, and need the power and the screen real estate.
Everyone seems to think it's possible that we'll get that MBP Upgrade this year, right!? #pray
Legit i wonder?!
I would say yes this year and yes to some time around June - July at the latest mid august. Personally i am about to return my 2018 this coming week - i love and enjoy it but i am very weary of issues cropping up and know for a fact when that 16" comes out ill have wished i returned this one. (assuming i dont)
in the mean time my girlfriend will let me use her surface laptop (#blessedtohavealaptoptouse).
i also came from a 2012 rMBP that broke but had it till last September... such a tank, i loved that machine.