Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't think iOS devices will ever entirely replace the need for a "real" computer aka laptop or desktop. One example use case: software development. If you made iOS capable of running a full blown developer toolset, well, pretty soon it's no longer a stripped down minimal OS but a full fledged OS with bigger hardware requirements, storage, etc etc etc.

I think I just described Microsoft's vision of Windows 8.
 
My bet for this rMBA is WWDC 2014, two years after the first rMBP was released.

Perhaps. But Intel has delayed the release of Broadwell, and it will likely be due only in the second half of 2014. If that is the case, then the new rMBA may be released only in the second half of 2014.
 
Retina in Apple's terms does not only mean high resolution but also HiDPI. The HD4400 is absolutely capable of driving a resolution of 3200x1800.
Well, technically, yes. But it clearly can't do anything with it. I use a Sony VAIO Pro 13" (it has a FullHD display) and it can't cope with challenges like displaying a pdf file and make the user navigate through it fluently. It just isn't powerful enough. I don't believe (and I never will) that it will make the user browse the internet comfortably in Samsung 9 resolution.
 
Perhaps. But Intel has delayed the release of Broadwell, and it will likely be due only in the second half of 2014. If that is the case, then the new rMBA may be released only in the second half of 2014.

Unfortunately you're right. Apple has had Intel chips early before though. So it's possible they could still be aiming for WWDC. That's what I'm hoping anyway. But given how long the waiting for Haswell MBP thread got I'm not holding my breath!
 
Unfortunately you're right. Apple has had Intel chips early before though. So it's possible they could still be aiming for WWDC. That's what I'm hoping anyway. But given how long the waiting for Haswell MBP thread got I'm not holding my breath!

It appears that Intel has delayed the release of Broadwell due to manufacturing reasons, and not just because it wanted to give Haswell more breathing space. If that holds true, then perhaps Intel is unable to deliver Broadwell to Apple before the scheduled release date and in time for WWDC.
 
Thinness:

I don't see Apple removing the USB connector (unless the new 12" MBA becomes just an iPad with a keyboard). I think the USB connector is still a necessary connection on a computer so I think that is the limiting factor. I can even imagine Apple inventing a special USB receptacle that doesn't completely house the incoming USB plug (so the USB connector isn't the limiting factor), but that would probably have already been seen in a new patent application.

I would definitely like the new MBA to be thinner. Naturally, being thinner would almost certainly make it lighter. Reducing its size and weight is like a work of art. It makes it look more beautiful and it makes it even more portable, allowing you to effortlessly to take it even more places. I'd like it be like short (thin) hardcover book that I can simply throw in my backpack and take it anywhere.

How terrible would it be if the dropped USB and added a lightning port and included a dongle adapter. :eek:
 
How terrible would it be if the dropped USB and added a lightning port and included a dongle adapter. :eek:

That would be totally stupid!

But, remember that, the current MBA's thickest section is in the middle (tapered to be thinner near the USB connector, giving the illusion that the USB port was the limiting factor).

I'm hoping the 2014 thinner new MBA is truly limited by the USB port (that the maximum thickness is the thickness of how thin the current MBA is at the USB input port).
 
That would be totally stupid!

But, remember that, the current MBA's thickest section is in the middle (tapered to be thinner near the USB connector, giving the illusion that the USB port was the limiting factor).

I'm confused. It looks like the USB is placed in the thickest part of the body?

292291-unboxing-the-apple-macbook-air-13-inch-mid-2012-side-by-side-closed.jpg
 
I'm confused. It looks like the USB is placed in the thickest part of the body?

Image

In sorry for the confusion. I'm talking about the tapering along the keyboard edge. The computer is thinnest at the USB connector but gets thicker as you move towards the middle of the keyboard.

I assume that tapering is not necessary, but I could be wrong.
 
Last edited:
In sorry for the confusion. I'm talking about the tapering along the keyboard edge. The computer is thinnest at the USB connector but gets thicker as you move towards the middle of the keyboard.

I assume that tapering is not necessary, but I could be wrong.

If Apple does not use tapering, perhaps the new Air will be thicker in the largest parts than the old one. But there could be more room for battery life.
 
I'm go with MBA 2013...
but still waiting for new-design....
 
Last edited:
I agree. To me the current MBA's most appealing feature is its remarkably long battery life. Thus, I can't see Apple making a modification in the next refresh of the line that would shorten battery life. Like everybody else, I would love to see a super high resolution display, especially if it could be included without shortening battery life.

You and I are still lovin our Airs!:cool:
 
I can't see how can they make it better, design-wise? it's already very sexy :D

Well, it's already late but i fkin hope that it will have at least an 1080p display...
 
Well, it's already late but i fkin hope that it will have at least an 1080p display...

I don't see them simply upgrading the resolution. I will be 'retina' (4 pixels to 1) of something like every other product.
 
I can't see how can they make it better, design-wise? it's already very sexy :D

Well, it's already late but i fkin hope that it will have at least an 1080p display...

A 1920x1080 display would have a 16:9 aspect ratio, while Apple is clearly going towards a 16:10 aspect ratio.

----------

I don't see them simply upgrading the resolution. I will be 'retina' (4 pixels to 1) of something like every other product.

If rumors are to be believed in, then the resolution would be a weird 2304x1440 (which would be roughly the same pixel density as the current 13-inch Pro).
 
- Would love a 12" screen without an increase in laptop size over the 11"
- Would love Retina
- Would love a rotating touch screen so that it can double up as an iPad

Apart from that, that's all that I could really ask from the Macbook Air
 
No kidding.

In a few years, Macs won't even exist anymore. Apple is clearly shifting towards iOS devices. The iPhone and the iPad now have 64-bit processors, which will finally allow them to multi-task (I'm talking about real multitasking here, not the joke that is multitasking under iOS 7). And there are rumors of a 12-inch iPad (an iPad Pro) which would be one more step towards replacing laptops. And, most of all: Apple is the market leader in smartphones and tablets, and it could spread its dominance over the broader devices market.

If you look at it, all innovation is geared towards iOS devices before they head to Macs. Macs are clearly not the priority, and perhaps Apple will phase them out as soon as it can replace them with iOS devices.

You're out of your mind if you think anyone a mobile phone or tablet will ever replace a Windows/Mac. Simply put, most applications in the world have been designed for the x86 architecture and aren't compatible with ARM. Therefore ARM-based computers can never fully replace an x86-based computer.

Also multitasking has nothing to do with 32-bit or 64-bit.
 
I apologise if this has already been brought up, but I am actually thinking that apple might converge both the MacBook Air and retina MacBook Pro. So instead of 2 separate models, we simply have the retina macbook in 11", 13" and 15" models. They will use the boxy form factor of the existing retina MacBook Pro models (which are actually thinner than the current MacBook Air, as the tapered design looks great but is a waste of space). They will start at 8gb ram/128 ssd standard, and have the option of upgrading to 16gb/1tb ssd.

To me, it makes sense when you consider that the 13" RMBP isn't that much more expensive than the 13" MBA.

Apple will still keep the base 11" macbook air around as a price point (no option to upgrade). Finally drop the normal 13" MBP.

If that happens, it would drop my 2012 11" air for a retina model.
 
- Would love a 12" screen without an increase in laptop size over the 11"
- Would love Retina
- Would love a rotating touch screen so that it can double up as an iPad

Apart from that, that's all that I could really ask from the Macbook Air

If the 12" screen is 16:10, then it may fit the same width as the current 11" model (which is 16:9), but the height will have to be increased (which is in fact not bad, given that there will probably be room for a trackpad the same size as the other Mac laptops, instead of the smaller trackpad that the 11" now has).

As for the rotating screen, that will of course not happen. Not at this stage of development, at least.

----------

You're out of your mind if you think anyone a mobile phone or tablet will ever replace a Windows/Mac. Simply put, most applications in the world have been designed for the x86 architecture and aren't compatible with ARM. Therefore ARM-based computers can never fully replace an x86-based computer.

Also multitasking has nothing to do with 32-bit or 64-bit.

Not out of my mind at all. Apple sells millions and millions of iOS devices, while the Mac has never been a huge success. It makes perfect sense for Apple to make a transition from Macs (OS X) to iPads (iOS) in order to gain market share and to bring the dispute to its territory.

x86 architecture is not compatible with ARM. But Apple has made the transition before, and more than once. Intel is inside Macs since 2006, although Macs had existed for two decades before that. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple turned to ARM in the future. I don't know if ARM cannot replace Intel. It certainly can't now, in 2013, and it won't in 2014. But these companies are fighting a tough war. ARM is improving its architecture to make it a worth competitor to Intel.

I'm not talking one or two years here. It's still a future that has to be built. And Apple is of course looking into this possibility. Even Microsoft, a long-time partner of Intel, launched Windows RT. It was a failure, but ARM architecture is not ready yet, so the launch of Windows RT was premature. Why Apple won't do this in the future?

----------

I apologise if this has already been brought up, but I am actually thinking that apple might converge both the MacBook Air and retina MacBook Pro. So instead of 2 separate models, we simply have the retina macbook in 11", 13" and 15" models. They will use the boxy form factor of the existing retina MacBook Pro models (which are actually thinner than the current MacBook Air, as the tapered design looks great but is a waste of space). They will start at 8gb ram/128 ssd standard, and have the option of upgrading to 16gb/1tb ssd.

To me, it makes sense when you consider that the 13" RMBP isn't that much more expensive than the 13" MBA.

Apple will still keep the base 11" macbook air around as a price point (no option to upgrade). Finally drop the normal 13" MBP.

If that happens, it would drop my 2012 11" air for a retina model.

Here's what I think will happen:

• Apple will drop the cMBP entirely;

• Apple will release a 12" MBA (or 11.8" or something similar) with a 16:10 aspect ratio, and will drop the two current MBA models (perhaps not at the time of release, but it will);

• Apple will keep the 12" MBA and the 13" and 15" MBP as separate, although consistent, lines of laptops.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.