Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wow! Despite only having 8GB of RAM, the M1 MacBook Pro's fans did not audibly spin-up when 50 apps were open or when 10 YouTube videos were playing simultaneously.

Although I would get 16GB of RAM if I bought an M1 MacBook Air (I prefer the Air), it's amazing that only 8GB was enough for the fans not to audibly spin-up when 50 apps were opened or when 10 YouTube videos were playing simultaneously.
 
Watch my 2020 MBP connect to an eGPU and obliterate the M1 while connected to my Nikon, SSD and two external monitors at the same time like an actual professional device.

Awww.... too soon? Maybe they’ll get it right with the M2.
You’re getting a lot of flak for this comment, but regardless of low/high end Mac you’re not wrong. Lack of eGPU support is a real blow.
 
Wow! Despite only having 8GB of RAM, the M1 MacBook Pro's fans did not audibly spin-up when 50 apps were open or when 10 YouTube videos were playing simultaneously.

Although I would get 16GB of RAM if I bought an M1 MacBook Air (I prefer the Air), it's amazing that only 8GB was enough for the fans not to audibly spin-up when 50 apps were opened or when 10 YouTube videos were playing simultaneously.
That what happens when you have appropriate memory management technology in place. Over the years, we have been taught by PC/Android community that there is always a need of more RAM. As a consequence, they started pulling android phones with 8GB of RAM or more, which is ridiculous. Apple never really officially released the RAM capacity of the iPhone for a reason. It just didnt matter at all. With M1, Apple showed us that 8GB is a lot of RAM that for the vast majority of people is more than sufficient and if it is properly managed it could be blazing fast (Typying on a laptop PC that currently uses 6,7GB of RAM with only a few browser tabs opened).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery
I just traded in my 2020 i5 16/1TB that I bought last week for an M1 8/512. Man it’s fast. Immediately noticeable fast. Everything moves and launches very quickly and smoothly.

Hmmmm, that is not what I was hoping to hear!

I have the 2020 10th gen i5 16/512 and am slightly regretting not waiting for the M1's to be released. Considering I paid £1800 for it 6 months ago, they are only going for £1250-£1300 used on Ebay so I can't justify that sort of price drop just yet in order to chop it in for an M1 MBP with the same specs. Will wait to see what the 14" ones look like next year hopefully.
 
25 watt system in package or only the CPU?
The whole thing. Not just the cpu, that’s impressive
At full usage the m1 gpu draws 10w so around 30w the whole mac, while my 1050ti system that has less raw cpu power and lets say around the same gpu power , the whole device draws 44w
 
Well the performance is great no doubt.
But i would apreciate some test from daily use.
I mean, why and how often do you opening all your 50 aps one by one?
The exporting in fcpx is better.
In real life does the 2-3 minutes makes any difference? Not really.

Those are some evaluation factors for me personaly to judge if ist worth to switch or not...and nit just follow the best gear syndrom

But i have to add as well that apple did great job with the m1 and its very good ofcourse :)
 
So, my take home from this is that, unless you spend your days converting high res videos as your main use for your computer, just about everyone else would be better off getting a MBA with the same specs.
Lighter, slicker, cheaper.
 
Well the performance is great no doubt.
But i would apreciate some test from daily use.
I mean, why and how often do you opening all your 50 aps one by one?
The exporting in fcpx is better.
In real life does the 2-3 minutes makes any difference? Not really.

Those are some evaluation factors for me personaly to judge if ist worth to switch or not...and nit just follow the best gear syndrom

But i have to add as well that apple did great job with the m1 and its very good ofcourse :)

Well, absolutely. If you’ve never hit the ceiling of your current Mac potential then you are probably fine with waiting a bit longer for your apps to load.
However, for everyone that has had (for example) Logic Pro stopping playback because it has hit max CPU, then this is very attractive considering its entry level price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GumaRodak
It will be interesting to see how much these M1 units cannibalise “higher spec” Macs in the short term given that they blow them out of the water, e.g. perversely the average Mac price purchased drops significantly? I guess a lot depends how long it takes to have a M(x) “high spec” offer to replace them.

I guess a hit to the value of secondhand X86 Macs to?

One supposes that Apple imagines unit volumes will increase considerably.
 
The low end MacBook Pros are junk. And you guys are dancing around like fairies celebrating the fact that the M1 can beat them.

How many years did it take Apple to get the Mac Pro right?
Double that and that's when you'll see Apple silicon that can compete with it.
Actually, I’m ‘dancing around like a fairy’ because of what these first efforts mean to the future of the mac.

You see, Steve Jobs absolutely intend to develop a more power-efficient version of x86 by licensing with Intel and can be integrated into the Apple-designed SoC.

Therefore, Rosetta 2 is not required and won't be having any sort of reduction in performance or compatibility issues.

Tim Cook is not that visionary and you will be buying inferior Apple products for years to come.
Ahh the old ‘write it big and people will believe me’ trick. Good one.
 
The performance and reviews of these laptops has really thrown me. I need a new MacBook at some point, but I was happy to wait a generation to see how the launch of Apple Silicon shakes out. Now I’m not entirely sure what the benefits of waiting are. Didn’t expect them to smash it out the park like this on the first swing.
 
Yieeehah! The CPU 'performance-game' is finally back after years of hibernation.

Waiting for the MacBook Air I ordered to arrive on monday.
 
2020 13-inch MacBook Pro with 1.4GHz quad-core Core i5 processor, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645, and 8GB RAM.

edit: yes, i5-8257U


Not really a mid 2020 model though is it, it has the same 8th gen processor as the year before. They didn't change the processors they just slightly modified the SSD configs, for all intents and purposes the entry level 1.4ghz MacBook Pro was't updated for 18+ months.
 
So just how much faster is the base model Air Intel (2020) vs the base model Air M1 in regular everyday person usage? Safari, Mail, Messages, Photos, Music, Etc.?

I don't do anything intensive so I just want to know if it's worth the upgrade from my only 6 month old Intel Air to get the M1 or maybe just wait for 2021 and see what the next gun brings and hopefully a 14" screen option?
 
Watch my 2020 MBP connect to an eGPU and obliterate the M1 while connected to my Nikon, SSD and two external monitors at the same time like an actual professional device.

Awww.... too soon? Maybe they’ll get it right with the M2.
I guess it depends what your profession is..... 🤷‍♀️
 
Typing on a 2020 MBP that's 4 months old, bought after the refresh (Magic Keyboard and double storage) thinking I was safe as the 14" didn't seem likely. Then the M1 comes along. Spoke to Apple to plead my case and they offered me £780 but I can get more on eBay so will be going down that route so I can get a new M1 MBP.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.