Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How about they let give us our side button back. Why they moved control center (something I don’t even use) to the side button and removing the ability to have a favorites dock is beyond me. Feels like this years OS’s updates have been worse.
I use control center all the time, I love it being the side button.
 
Anyone else feel like they need to sit down and work out just how the apple watch works nowadays... i feel like i don't really know anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TGM85
YES THANK YOU! Apple should not have taken that option away, and could have instead made it a toggle to enable/disable.
 
I can’t believe it came to this.

Should’ve never got rid of it.
Yes, they should have gotten rid of it but it should have been done with a configuration like this so you could switch back. It was always frustrating to the rest of us that our watch faces would frequently change to a different face with just an accidental swipe while putting on a jacket. I ended up deleting all other watch faces to stop this. I only added another face when this was fixed in Watch OS 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iOS Geek
Glad to see Apple catching up with the Pixel Watch. This "feature" has been on Pixel Watch since day 1
What catch up? This was a feature in pre-10 Watch OS but it caused problems for some people, so Apple changed to a two step process. Now they are giving us the option for an easy change or a two-step change.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CasinoOwl
Please don't!!! So many times I would look down, and see some other face. Where I had accidentally swiped.
It’s an option so just don’t enable the swipe-to-change option and nothing will change for you.

Just maybe this is a sign that Apple is finally waking up to the fact that a watch is a very personal device and different people will want to set up aspects of their user interface quite differently, e.g. now that this swipe-to-change debate seems to be about to end people are now complaining in this thread about control centre on the side button and the moving of the dock to the crown double-press.

I don’t care about where control centre or dock are because I use them so little but I feel other people’s pain so if Apple does “fix” this issue I hope continue to adopt a more configurable approach and don’t simply put the dock back on the side button but instead make the single-press on the side button, the double-press on the crown and the upward-swipe configurable so that people can choose to put the dock and/or control centre where they want or, for people like me, use those actions to quickly get to apps I use frequently that I don’t have space to dedicate a complication to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
🙏🏻🙏🏻 Apple; while such a small feature it was greatly misses, hopefully it will remain in the final release of watch os 10.2
 
  • Like
Reactions: TGM85
This is fantastic news. Is it also signalling a bit of a change of attitude at Apple?
Julian – calling to mind a few examples of previous defaults which eventually became user-facing choices, I don't think it's a change of attitude at Apple. I can understand the stance that other companies make so many things settings that the "80 percent" find them too complicated or aren't aware of the settings they'd actually want, so I think Apple exercises a lot of caution before "promoting" something to be one, and even their iOS and macOS "Settings" apps have a lot of settings. I'm just glad they finally decided that swiping to change the watch face qualified.
 
I am so pleased that Apple actually listened to users. I gave my feedback when testing the first beta but didn’t expect anything to change. Thank you Apple.
I was right there with you after the release, as apparently were others. Keep it up, I say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GBstoic
I mean, the true black backgrounds for the apps looked way better on the display. Now the apps are too colorful and battery consumption obviously is higher.
Absolutely. It's the first time with the Watch that I've had the feeling of a device beginning to forget its identity.
 
Not sure why I’m being downvoted here. Options means you can have it either way. Seems like a win-win to me.

:rolleyes:
This calls to my mind other companies' systems and apps that make so many things options, even to the point of exposing lengthy files, that setting them feels akin to manually doing taxes or something. That's great for enthusiastic nerds like me, but I know that doesn't describe plenty of Apple's customers, so I can understand the predilection for pronounced caution before "promoting" something to a setting. They do ultimately promote many things like this gesture, and I'm glad it was one that made it.
 
Why was it removed?
Because it was too easy to accidentally switch watch faces. Many of us were frustrated to look down and find the wrong watch face showing as a result of a casual brush against something. I frequently had to change my watch faces after putting on a coat. In Watch OS 10, Apple changed it to require a long press before you could swipe to change the face. That seems to have been a problem for some. Now they have created a setting that lets users choose one or the other behavior to satisfy both groups of users.
 
Because it was too easy to accidentally switch watch faces. Many of us were frustrated to look down and find the wrong watch face showing as a result of a casual brush against something. I frequently had to change my watch faces after putting on a coat. In Watch OS 10, Apple changed it to require a long press before you could swipe to change the face. That seems to have been a problem for some. Now they have created a setting that lets users choose one or the other behavior to satisfy both groups of users.
Well, technically they didn't change it, just removed the quick method, as the long press method was always available as it's the setup mechanism too of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.