Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.
It's not just an app. It's a complete hardware redesign that makes the ECG possible. It's fortunate (but not a coincidence) for Apple that the sensor market innovates at a similar rate to their release cycles. So the moment you purchase a series 4 watch, Apple will have a new watch with new features ready to announce.
 
The ECG app is available in the United States only.
As explicitly stated at the keynote, until other countries approve it. What exactly was your point here? I don’t know if it was a complaint or pointing out what the next complaint from others would be?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mthomas1987
I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.

Dude it’s hardware lol that’s how it goes they can’t make the watch have a heart sensor. You can get good trade in for your 3 like I did. I got $225 for it so it didn’t Hurt too much
 
This is pretty sweet but I didn't find it worth the price tag of the S4.. so almost a quarter of the way through the products life cycle it finally gets its flagship feature? Better off waiting for S5 if you want to upgrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: repoman016
I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.
It's an app that is tied into the new hardware. The hardware was not available in Series 3, and the FCC also had to get involved. I'm sure that in a couple of years, our blood's glucose levels will be monitored without puncturing the skin, and once that is perfected, it will get into the next Apple Watch. Medical advancements happen, coupled with technology.
 
I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.

The reason is simple - just like your car is not able to fly - because it lacks wings.
...Series 3 lacks the sensors needed to measure it...
 
I'm not sure what's more alarming. Apple trying to lie to people that this thing actually has any medical benefits, or the people who seem to lap it up.
 
It's an app that is tied into the new hardware. The hardware was not available in Series 3, and the FCC also had to get involved. I'm sure that in a couple of years, our blood's glucose levels will be monitored without puncturing the skin, and once that is perfected, it will get into the next Apple Watch. Medical advancements happen, coupled with technology.

Question: is monitoring glucose without puncturing the skin already available (not in smartwatches, I mean in medical practice)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
Imho it's a great feature for those that want it. I don't worry about death, if it happens it happens, nor do I wear watch as time means nada to me.
 
No they don't. This is very sensitive health data, and it's not Apple's job to facilitate building a doorway for a bunch of hackneyed Android devs to screw it up and cause problems. Then Apple will be blamed for Google's failure to properly secure their platform. That's to say NOTHING of insurers, who would love to "better serve you" by accessing that and deciding how quickly they want to lobby you off their roster.

I completely agree. I don't want google's dirty fingers anywhere near the health app.
 
Nice to see they may deliver this before the end of the year as they'd claimed. There certainly was potential for red tape to hold it up.
 
I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.

I'm upset that the 2019 Porsche has a better engine than the 2018. I could really use the extra horsepower. I'm pissed Porsche didn't remove the engine from my 2018 and install a 2019 engine for free. Porsche always has a way to make me spend money.
 
No they don't. This is very sensitive health data, and it's not Apple's job to facilitate building a doorway for a bunch of hackneyed Android devs to screw it up and cause problems. Then Apple will be blamed for Google's failure to properly secure their platform. That's to say NOTHING of insurers, who would love to "better serve you" by accessing that and deciding how quickly they want to lobby you off their roster.

If you think Apple is better at securing data than anyone else in the Valley your being foolish.
 
Last edited:
As explicitly stated at the keynote, until other countries approve it. What exactly was your point here? I don’t know if it was a complaint or pointing out what the next complaint from others would be?

It is a complaint. They should wait until the feature can be available everywhere. What’s the point of paying full price for a watch with electrodes if I can’t use them to perform an ECG? But oh well I should’ve gotten used to this from Apple as the same happened with the HomePod, Apple Pay, the TV and News apps...
[doublepost=1543426186][/doublepost]
Question: is monitoring glucose without puncturing the skin already available (not in smartwatches, I mean in medical practice)?

Yes it is.
 
It can read your ECG but just not around medical facilities, party balloons, etc.


 
It is a complaint. They should wait until the feature can be available everywhere.

I totally disagree on this one. You don't wait until all main features are available everywhere simply because some governments take 1000x time in making up their mind and rules (as long as the company is clear on which function is not available). The customer makes the final decision; if you think that it's unfair to pay full price now, then just wait.
 
It is a complaint. They should wait until the feature can be available everywhere. What’s the point of paying full price for a watch with electrodes if I can’t use them to perform an ECG? But oh well I should’ve gotten used to this from Apple as the same happened with the HomePod, Apple Pay, the TV and News apps...

Don't you think Apple would rather release everything at once, like they do with their hardware?

Like Apple Pay, this has to have governmental clearance in various different countries. It would be foolish of Apple to hold it back in one country because of another country's red tape. Apple Pay also has to work with the banks in each country, like Germany where the banks have been holding it up for 2 years. The other services you mentioned have to be localized for language and regional content.
 
Question: is monitoring glucose without puncturing the skin already available (not in smartwatches, I mean in medical practice)?
I am not a medical doctor but from what I have read in academic journals, non intrusive glucose monitoring is still in development. Sensors exist which can analyze sweat (even imperceptible amounts that we all produce regularly) without puncturing the skin but they are not accurate enough for FDA approval for use for glucose monitoring. I think it is just a matter of time before it is commercially available and whoever gets there first is going to make a fortune.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.