So they'll deliver it by the end of the year. As promised. What's the next thing people will whine about?![]()
See the above entry about the dude whining that his series 3 won't do this.... Tweetstorm in 3-2-1....
So they'll deliver it by the end of the year. As promised. What's the next thing people will whine about?![]()
It's not just an app. It's a complete hardware redesign that makes the ECG possible. It's fortunate (but not a coincidence) for Apple that the sensor market innovates at a similar rate to their release cycles. So the moment you purchase a series 4 watch, Apple will have a new watch with new features ready to announce.I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.
As explicitly stated at the keynote, until other countries approve it. What exactly was your point here? I don’t know if it was a complaint or pointing out what the next complaint from others would be?The ECG app is available in the United States only.
I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.
It doesn’t have the hardware to support this in any way, way different sensors and hardware required from what prior models used ...I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.
It's an app that is tied into the new hardware. The hardware was not available in Series 3, and the FCC also had to get involved. I'm sure that in a couple of years, our blood's glucose levels will be monitored without puncturing the skin, and once that is perfected, it will get into the next Apple Watch. Medical advancements happen, coupled with technology.I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.
I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.
It's an app that is tied into the new hardware. The hardware was not available in Series 3, and the FCC also had to get involved. I'm sure that in a couple of years, our blood's glucose levels will be monitored without puncturing the skin, and once that is perfected, it will get into the next Apple Watch. Medical advancements happen, coupled with technology.
No they don't. This is very sensitive health data, and it's not Apple's job to facilitate building a doorway for a bunch of hackneyed Android devs to screw it up and cause problems. Then Apple will be blamed for Google's failure to properly secure their platform. That's to say NOTHING of insurers, who would love to "better serve you" by accessing that and deciding how quickly they want to lobby you off their roster.
My guess is that will depend upon Canadian politiciansHopefully will be released in Canada as well but I doubt it will be day and date with the US.
Can’t wait to see which of my hearts the ECG measures.
EDIT: None of them are showing up. Not even the ****** lower-left-quadrant one.
View attachment 807101
so almost a quarter of the way through the products life cycle it finally gets its flagship feature?
I am pissed that this will not work with my Series 3!! I could really use this app. Apple has a way to make me spend money. I might be stubborn and not buy a Series 4 until refurbs come along.
No they don't. This is very sensitive health data, and it's not Apple's job to facilitate building a doorway for a bunch of hackneyed Android devs to screw it up and cause problems. Then Apple will be blamed for Google's failure to properly secure their platform. That's to say NOTHING of insurers, who would love to "better serve you" by accessing that and deciding how quickly they want to lobby you off their roster.
As explicitly stated at the keynote, until other countries approve it. What exactly was your point here? I don’t know if it was a complaint or pointing out what the next complaint from others would be?
Question: is monitoring glucose without puncturing the skin already available (not in smartwatches, I mean in medical practice)?
It is a complaint. They should wait until the feature can be available everywhere.
It is a complaint. They should wait until the feature can be available everywhere. What’s the point of paying full price for a watch with electrodes if I can’t use them to perform an ECG? But oh well I should’ve gotten used to this from Apple as the same happened with the HomePod, Apple Pay, the TV and News apps...
I am not a medical doctor but from what I have read in academic journals, non intrusive glucose monitoring is still in development. Sensors exist which can analyze sweat (even imperceptible amounts that we all produce regularly) without puncturing the skin but they are not accurate enough for FDA approval for use for glucose monitoring. I think it is just a matter of time before it is commercially available and whoever gets there first is going to make a fortune.Question: is monitoring glucose without puncturing the skin already available (not in smartwatches, I mean in medical practice)?