Nope - but being the iOS chief and having iOS take off you can clearly see how Steve lost his taste and was all over skeuomorphism. After all he was the CEO. Having one product that gently delivers growth and one product that massively delivers growth, it's a natural choice to go into that direction.
Rethink why you take stuff like "Notification Center" or "Mission Control" into a usually desktop-based OS. There is no need for it. It only distracts. Exposé and Cmd-Tabbing still is perfect.
My 0.02$
I replace my Macs about every two years, same as my iPhone.
I think I've read almost every post here. This is one of the most entertaining threads in a long time.
While it's pretty ridiculous to draw any conclusions based on one poster given the history of posters at past WWDC's that had nothing materially to do with a particular version of OS X, Apple is kind of running out of appropriate cat names.
Moving to shark names does give Apple a catch of marketable OS code names, Cookiecutter shark notwithstanding
iOS and OS X are not merging any time soon. What works on a 4" phone and a 30" display are very different. Microsoft is learning that lesson the hard way.
Do you mean "I've designed "?
OS X 10.8 "Mountain Lion"
OS X 10.9 ???
OS X 10.10 "Bo Derek"
Really? I'm not really hearing a lot of complaining from iMac owners about Launchpad in OS X and the "desktop" in iOS being pretty much identical...
Wait...you do know 10.10 is really 10.1, right? You'd be going backwards...
Really? I'm not really hearing a lot of complaining from iMac owners about Launchpad in OS X and the "desktop" in iOS being pretty much identical...
os 10.9 "schrödinger's cat" :d
is it dead or alive?
Wait...you do know 10.10 is really 10.1, right? You'd be going backwards...
So is there a consensus on what will happen after OS 10.9: will it be a new subversion under the 10 mark, e.g. 10.10 or whatever, or is the next step OS XI?
----------
:d
Wait...you do know 10.10 is really 10.1, right? You'd be going backwards...
I like this idea too but I don't think the next version would be "Y" since the X was a Roman numeral. I think it's more likely to be X1.I know, I'm a bit Late to the game, but I really like the idea that mobile OS is called just "7" and the non-mobile OS is called "X".
No cat names anymore and really "cool" product names. And it even can be continued with "Y" and "8".
Everyone is this thread is actually wrong. The billboard is clearly hinting at Apple's much rumoured new product line.
Image