Maybe Tom (aka: Doctor Q) also created Caffeine, zoso98765, & chrberni. Considering none of them ever made a single post.angelneo said:Dr Q, did you sign up that account by yourself? I smell conspiracy....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Maybe Tom (aka: Doctor Q) also created Caffeine, zoso98765, & chrberni. Considering none of them ever made a single post.angelneo said:Dr Q, did you sign up that account by yourself? I smell conspiracy....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
EricNau said:Maybe Tom (aka: Doctor Q) also created Caffeine, zoso98765, & chrberni. Considering none of them ever made a single post.
I know, you are probably right. It was meant as more of a joke anyway.Oryan said:I doubt Tom created them because if you just type in random id's, you would notice that most users (at least in my sample) have 0 posts.
Isn't the thread number 174905? Hmm.... is it some sort of trick question from Tom again? ......hmmmmm............ hmmm....... hmmm......Doctor Q said:It's especially cool that the thread number of this thread happens to be a power of two.
I'm guessing that even the amazing emw will need a moment to think about that claim.
(By the way, this is the most pointless thread ever. I read that somewhere on the Internet so it must be true.)
angelneo said:Isn't the thread number 174905? Hmm.... is it some sort of trick question from Tom again?
Pretty much everything is a power of two. Just not an integer one.Doctor Q said:It's especially cool that the thread number of this thread happens to be a power of two.
I was thinking about that too, but somehow with my thinkpad here (my powerbook is at home), I can't figure out a way to calculate x Root 174905 = 2.emw said:Pretty much everything is a power of two. Just not an integer one.
2^17.4162120065315
It took me a little while to work that out on my abacus.
No, because then I'd think you were talking to me.emw said:I say we all refer to Doctor Q simply as "Tom" from now on. It will be an inside joke for anyone geeky enough to make it through this thread.
superbovine said:towers of hanoi.... now that is supremely g33ky.
FYI: http://www.superkids.com/aweb/tools/logic/towers/
Doctor Q said:Grrrrrrrr! I was keeping an eye on the odometer on one of our cars as it approached 65,536 miles, but I missed it! I was gonna take a photo as a keepsake of the big moment, but I didn't catch it until 65,537! It's a big disappointment.
If I drive backwards a mile, will it roll back?
floriflee said:Doctor Q said:Grrrrrrrr! I was keeping an eye on the odometer on one of our cars as it approached 65,536 miles, but I missed it! I was gonna take a photo as a keepsake of the big moment, but I didn't catch it until 65,537! It's a big disappointment.
If I drive backwards a mile, will it roll back?
If Ferris Bueller's Day Off is any indication you're out of luck....
Doctor Q said:Nice summary, atszyman. Perhaps there is a curse of the 2-powers, preventing them from speaking. And it can only be broken by lucky number 2^13. But that wouldn't explain posts by 2^11.
So I have a simpler and more likely explanation. Let L = log base 2 (member number). If L is an integer, that member posts if and only if L and L-6 are both prime.
2048 = 2^11: 11 and 5 are both prime
8192 = 2^13: 13 and 7 are both prime
131072 = 2^17: 17 and 11 are both prime
Therefore, member #131,072 will be a talkative one.
I wonder if he's read A Void, a translation by Gilbert Adair of the amazing book La Disparation by Georges Perec. I bought A Void because of its geeky in-joke, not for its detective story. It might be fun to try to spot the in-joke while reading it, but that's hard to do since book reviews usually give it away.Mitthrawnuruodo said:A totally geeky, and slightly unrelated fact: tomrom is also Norwegian for void (as in empty space, but still).
Mitthrawnuruodo said:A totally geeky, and slightly unrelated fact: tomrom is also Norwegian for void (as in empty space, but still).
I'm such a geek...
Doctor Q said:I wonder if he's read A Void, a translation by Gilbert Adair of the amazing book La Disparation by Georges Perec. I bought A Void because of its geeky in-joke, not for its detective story. It might be fun to try to spot the in-joke while reading it, but that's hard to do since book reviews usually give it away.