Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would like Apple to start releasing professional products that are actually made to enhance the work of professionals, not well-monied consumers who like to pretend they are. The bar has been set so low for this particular product area that I no longer have a "wishlist" of things, as much as I simply hope for the new things not to be more awful than the last. We've been screaming at the top of our lungs for years now that we don't want thinner lighter, aluminum, glass, black, and only one kind of port, as none of those things make us better writers/editors/designers/architects. What I what is a matte screen that doesn't sear my retinas or heat up to 1000 degrees while I'm using it. And it would be nice if it came in a few sizes and weighed less than a quarter of a ton. I'd love a touch screen, even a glossy one, that did most of those things, but I'll take a capable one that doesn't. ARE YOU LISTENING APPLE??? I mean you're not, but that's what I'd like from you in 2018.
 
I bet you still use floppy disks
[doublepost=1516209695][/doublepost]
We won't get there without a push
[doublepost=1516209743][/doublepost]
Without a push we will never get there.
[doublepost=1516209796][/doublepost]
They did that because iCloud is replacing the time machine and they have nothing innovative to offer in the few years between now and LTE as the main source of internet.

A push?
Wireless technology is improving every year.
It has huge momentum already.

Fact of the matter - wired beats wireless ALWAYS under any circumstance, in every test, ever conducted. Even in any foreseeable future, it will still statistically beat wired in every speed test.
It is impossible for wireless to out perform wired, up until we have hit a plateau with wired technology - which we definitely have not.

Prove me wrong?
 
My wishes are pretty basic. I would like them to release a machine I could buy without feeling like I'm swallowing a bitter pill.

I used to drool at the latest offerings by this company. I couldn't wait for an opportunity to upgrade. But things haven't been the same for a while now.

I'm typing this on my rMBP15 (mid 2012). It's still a very nice machine, especially as my performance needs went down since the time of the purchase. But I'm not working on the go that much anymore, I can finally set up a home office and I need a bigger screen. I'm used to the retina, so I was thinking 27/5K. My laptop can't drive one unfortunately, so I was preparing myself to spend quite a bit on the upgrade.

But there is literally nothing I could buy with a peace of mind at the moment.

iMacs 5K are beautiful machines with internals more or less worth their money. There's lack of upgradeability and a waste of a gorgeous 5K screen, that can not be used as external monitor once the computer stops being useful, but I could swallow this. It is actually a stupid little thing that drives me crazy — VESA mount situation. I just don't understand why they had to take it away with their stand being an ergonomic nightmare that it is. I have neck/spine issues. I need to switch positions regularly and I need control. I need a monitor arm. It's such a basic feature that most monitors have. Why go and make things complicated? I know they let you choose between VESA and a stand in their configurator but that 1) would cut me off the used market more or less 2) is not available in my country atm (apple only sells few stock versions). The idea of paying a lot of money just to deal with this stupid limitation honestly makes me angry.

I could go for a new MBP + external display combo, but I'm just not prepared to pay this much for a machine I have this little confidence in. I don't want to worry about the keyboard breaking. I'm using an external keyboard. I touch type. I have a lot of custom shortcuts bound to the F row. I use Esc a lot. I don't want to pay few hundred more for a touch bar that will bring me nothing but pain those rare times I use the machine on the go. And those LG screens are just ugly. The idea of staring at one every day makes me upset.

New iMac Pro is a nice machine, and they do sell VESA adapters separately for those. But the only configuration they sell on the site currently is $7K-ish, which is 10+ times the average salary in the country. That's just not reasonable. Not for me at least.

Mac Mini and Mac Pro are dead. Macbook is underpowered for my needs. It feels like a cruel joke, because I really love macOS and I'm not ready to switch, yet there's nothing to upgrade to.

I have just put an order on a 24/FHD Dell. Even 5 years ago I would tell you I'd be never buying a screen of such a resolution ever again. But here I am, trying to waste as little as I can on a temporary solution that would let me sit out another year or two in hope Apple comes back to their senses.

So I'm not looking for anything groundbreaking from Apple in 2018. I'm willing to compromise on upgradeability, ports, the feeling of the keyboard. All I ask for is a reasonably priced and at least averagely performing machine without glaring quality problems and basic features taken away.
 
Last edited:
My wishes are pretty basic. I would like them to release a machine I could buy without feeling like I'm swallowing a bitter pill.

I used to drool at the latest offerings by this company. I couldn't wait for an opportunity to upgrade. But things haven't been the same for a while now.

I'm typing this on my rMBP15 (mid 2012). It's still a very nice machine, especially as my performance needs went down since the time of the purchase. But I'm not working on the go that much anymore, I can finally set up a home office and I need a bigger screen. I'm used to the retina, so I was thinking 27/5K. My laptop can't drive one unfortunately, so I was preparing myself to spend quite a bit on the upgrade.

But there is literally nothing I could buy with a peace of mind at the moment.

iMacs 5K are beautiful machines with internals more or less worth their money. There's lack of upgradeability and a waste of a gorgeous 5K screen, that can not be used as external monitor once the computer stops being useful, but I could swallow this. It is actually a stupid little thing that drives me crazy — VESA mount situation. I just don't understand why they had to take it away with their stand being an ergonomic nightmare that it is. I have neck/spine issues. I need to switch positions regularly and I need control. I need a monitor arm. It's such a basic feature that most monitors have. Why go and make things complicated? I know they let you choose between VESA and a stand in their configurator but it 1) would cut me off the used market more or less 2) is not available in my country atm (apple only sells few stock versions). The idea of paying a lot of money just to deal with this stupid limitation honestly makes me angry.

I could go for a new MBP + external display combo, but I'm just not prepared to pay this much for a machine I have this little confidence in. I don't want to worry about the keyboard breaking. I'm using an external keyboard. I touch type. I have a lot of custom shortcuts bound to the F row. I use Esc a lot. I don't want to pay few hundred more for a touch bar that will bring me nothing but pain those rare times I use the machine on the go. And those LG screens are just ugly. The idea of staring at one every day makes me upset.

New iMac Pro is a nice machine, and they do sell VESA adapters separately for those. But the only configuration they sell on the site currently is $7K-ish, which is 10+ times the average salary in the country. That's just not reasonable. Not for me at least.

Mac Mini and Mac Pro are dead. Macbook is underpowered for my needs. It literally feels like a cruel joke, because I really love macOS and I'm not ready to switch, yet but there's nothing to upgrade to.

I have just put an order on a 24/FHD Dell. You could ask me 5 years ago and I would already tell you I'd be never buying a screen of such a resolution ever again. But here I am, trying to waste as little as I can on a temporary solution that would let me sit out another year or two in hope Apple comes back to their senses.

So I'm not looking for anything groundbreaking from Apple in 2018. I'm willing to compromise on upgradeability, ports, the feeling of the keyboard. All I ask for as reasonably priced and at least averagely performing machines without glaring quality problems and basic features being taken away.
epic comment.

Agreed on all counts.
Thanks for the explanations :)

Apple is lagging HARD on their desktops.
10XX GTX Series (why are they STILL lagging behind in GPU configs?) , High refresh rate monitors (I have a 100hz 34" IPS X34 gsync monitor which rips iMac screens in almost everything),
Upgradeability (what happened?? people dont care how thin their "Pro" desktops are), and refresh frequency... jesuuuuuuuusss how old is the Mac Pro now? Yeh apple said a modular one is coming this year.. but is it? They seem to lag behind all their other time frames.

I had their last modular Mac Pro.. loved it.

Since then, I have moved to a Bohemoth of a desktop PC, fully watercooled and spec maxed to sh*t.
Apple could have been doing these things and taking my money, but no. RIP:(:apple:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tozovac
A push?
Wireless technology is improving every year.
It has huge momentum already.

Fact of the matter - wired beats wireless ALWAYS under any circumstance, in every test, ever conducted. Even in any foreseeable future, it will still statistically beat wired in every speed test.
It is impossible for wireless to out perform wired, up until we have hit a plateau with wired technology - which we definitely have not.

Prove me wrong?
It's 100% easier for me to pickup my MacBook Pro up off my desk and take it over to my beanbag so I can read my e-textbooks and do homework there with wifi, than it is to do the same with with an ethernet cable. Q.E.D.
 
It's 100% easier for me to pickup my MacBook Pro up off my desk and take it over to my beanbag so I can read my e-textbooks and do homework there with wifi, than it is to do the same with with an ethernet cable. Q.E.D.
You're confusing practicality with performance. We're discussing performance, sorry
 
It boggles the mind that you can't think of a single real world example where wireless outperforms wired using performance as the only measurement characteristic.
 
Bring back the MagSafe power cords for the whole notebook lineup - and adapt it for iPads - that was one of the best features Apple came up with - don't know why they got rid of them... I've gone thru several lightning cables for my ipads - but if they had a MagSafe adapter for them - I wouldn't have ruined so many...

And a matching space grey 5K display for the iMac Pro...

And space grey AirPods!
 
A push?
Wireless technology is improving every year.
It has huge momentum already.

Fact of the matter - wired beats wireless ALWAYS under any circumstance, in every test, ever conducted. Even in any foreseeable future, it will still statistically beat wired in every speed test.
It is impossible for wireless to out perform wired, up until we have hit a plateau with wired technology - which we definitely have not.

Prove me wrong?

Quantum entanglement will always be faster than a wired connection
 
  • Like
Reactions: pwm86
Thanks for sharing that random fact

However we are discussing wired vs wireless :)
I'm still just surprised you can't think of a single real world example where wireless communications outperforms wired on a performance basis.

To bring this thread back to its original purpose, I would love for Apple to bring a 3360*2100 pixel 15 inch MBP, instead of just a 2880*1800 pixel 15 inch. I chose the higher res (1680*1050) mid 2012 classic MBP on purpose, so that it could display more on the screen compared to the 1440*900 model. Since they doubled (quadrupled) the resolution for the retina displays, I want a custom higher resolution model so the 1680*1050 doesn't have to be fake scaled up. A pure doubling would be better, IMO. Heck, it can even be build to order, like the 1680*1050 model was.
 
Last edited:
I'm still just surprised you can't think of a single real world example where wireless communications outperforms wired on a performance basis.

You can think of one where it doesn't? But performance aside, there is also the matter of reliability. If I have something important to get done, a wired connection is a must.
 
I'm still just surprised you can't think of a single real world example where wireless communications outperforms wired on a performance basis.

To bring this thread back to its original purpose, I would love for Apple to bring a 3360*2100 pixel 15 inch MBP, instead of just a 2880*1800 pixel 15 inch. I chose the higher res (1680*1050) mid 2012 classic MBP on purpose, so that it could display more on the screen compared to the 1440*900 model. Since they doubled (quadrupled) the resolution for the retina displays, I want a custom higher resolution model so the 1680*1050 doesn't have to be fake scaled up. A pure doubling would be better, IMO. Heck, it can even be build to order, like the 1680*1050 model was.
Awesome, well noone else has either.
Care to share some examples of where wireless outperforms wired? (excluding outlandish free moving object examples such as satellites and planes etc)
 
You can think of one where it doesn't? But performance aside, there is also the matter of reliability. If I have something important to get done, a wired connection is a must.
Well sure, imagine you're an NFL coach. You've got a headset on and you're talking to other people who also miced up. Do you, A, wire up and simultaneously get someone to trip over you're cord and break it too leading to some transceiver somewhere else, or keep the transceiver entirely on your person.
Or lets say you're a police officer, performing a traffic stop. I'd love to hear how -BigMac- proposes we run ethernet cables to cars that can go 100 miles an hour so they can check to see if someone is a criminal, instead of using their Motorola to talk to dispatch, or inside the car computer to look it up on a 4G LTE public safety network and log it themselves.
Here's one I've lived personally, what if you live in an old apartment you're renting, and your office is away from the cable internet link to the house. You can run 100 feet of ethernet, or set up wifi. Mind you, the ethernet would have to run along the floor through the living room, cross a well traveled path, travel along the hallway that covers nearly the entire length of the apartment, go around a corner where theres another frequently travelled area, then through a doorway where the door closes tightly with the frame, and finally to the desk with my MBP. Please note, I admit the wifi signal was poor, but reality said to me that ethernet cables were impossible. With me being the third person to move into that three bedroom appt. was no alternate room for the desk location either. Either I take the wifi performance hit or I have NOTHING.
Edit to add, I wrote this up during the time -BigMac- posted, so didn't see the outlandish comment, but wrote it from the expectation that he would counter with that from most outlandish to least outlandish.
Also, what if you had $1000 bucks to get information 1 KM (or 1 mile). Do you do it with radios (think wifi routers with yagi antennas and preamps(or even simple $25 handhelds depending on the situation)) or with your choice of wired connection. Mind you, you have to provide the cabling in between if you choose that route. This is astonishingly real world.
-->I'll grant you if I am a desk with my choice of hookups, performance wise I too will choose wired or wireless. ---->All I'm saying is anytime you throw some sort of appreciable distance into it, wireless will frequently beat wired, whether out of wired being a straight up impossibility, or it being VASTLY more economical.
 
Last edited:
Well sure, imagine you're a ... I'm saying is anytime you throw some sort of appreciable distance into it, wireless will frequently beat wired, whether out of wired being a straight up impossibility, or it being VASTLY more economical.

Well, no doubt. But now you've equivocated on the terms performance and reliability to mean something other than we were talking about. Yes, there are applications where wireless is more practical. But, afaik, you never gain in performance or reliability unless you toss in some mitigating factor. (i.e.: that undersea fibre isn't so fast and reliable anymore after it's cut, eh?)

If I'm recording a podcast, I wire my mic. If I'm doing a screen recording of my iPhone, I wire it to the computer. If I'm doing important IT-related client work, I wire my computer to the Internet via Ethernet. I think this was the point. (And, on my part, expressing some concern over the seeming trend of everything moving to wireless and port removal.)

And, then there are the health concerns associated with all the additional (often unnecessary) RF, especially close proximity stuff like switching from wired ear-buds to AirPods and stuff like that. We're just starting to scientifically understand that you don't need ionizing levels and actually destroy DNA to impact things like cellular communication and/or epigenetic impact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmerJabber
Camera Roll Back on phone even if you are using iCloud. I want to be able to use my phone for personal and work photos but don't want them mixed. For work, I want to take photos then use the USB cable to put them on my work Windows machine; but I have to download the photos from iCloud, what a mess. Also how about being able to keep originals of certain photos on my phone - sometimes I don't have cell reception and want to pull up a photo I took yesterday, oops its just a thumbnail now! :mad:

Also iCloud photo management is a mess. I have to select each individual photo, no drag to select, no ctrl+shift to select multiple photos... what a joke. Google photos is much better IMO.
 
Camera Roll Back on phone even if you are using iCloud. I want to be able to use my phone for personal and work photos but don't want them mixed. For work, I want to take photos then use the USB cable to put them on my work Windows machine; but I have to download the photos from iCloud, what a mess. Also how about being able to keep originals of certain photos on my phone - sometimes I don't have cell reception and want to pull up a photo I took yesterday, oops its just a thumbnail now! :mad:

Also iCloud photo management is a mess. I have to select each individual photo, no drag to select, no ctrl+shift to select multiple photos... what a joke. Google photos is much better IMO.

Or, Apple could stop trying to be the 'dancing paperclip' Microsoft was, and let *us* decide how to use the apps and manage the photos, instead of trying to do it for us the way we don't want it to.

Yea, iCloud photos is a joke, but I don't trust Google with photos. I'm hunting for a solution, and just putting images/videos into dated folders for now. I'm looking into using Plex for everything, as it seems Apple has gotten out of the music/photo/video management game.
 
I would like to see a laptop well-designed with laser-focus towards the desires of the power user who wants function/flexibility first, not fashion.

Here's a little port porn to make you drool.

7.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: sracer and David G.
I would like to see a laptop well-designed with laser-focus towards the desires of the power user who wants function/flexibility first, not fashion.

Here's a little port porn to make you drool.

View attachment 751201

Yes, they should at least have one power-user level machine. The current MBP (besides keyboard and *only* USB-C) is probably what the vast majority of the 'pro' market actually wants. The difference is that pro used to be a quality of the machine, not whether a lawyer can use it in a coffee shop.

Same with the cylinder Mac Pro. I'd love one (and may still have to get one), and it's pretty ideal (besides lack of TB3, and unnecessarily high cost, even on 'sale') for me. But, it isn't the machine the true pro users were asking for. It's more prosumer or aimed at very specific verticals.

True pro users need power and GPUs, not sleek, thin, light, etc. Yes, they'll take those things, gladly, but when push comes to shove, computing power is money for a pro.

The iMac Pro is, probably, a pretty good attempt at making something for a good portion of Pros (if eGPU support rocks, which it looks good so far). But, it does worry me if it was supposed to be pro replacement for desktops, period. The screen is awesome, but I don't want an all-in-one. A lot of people don't.

And, for people like me, semi-pro users without huge corporate massive budgets, Apple really has nothing. I'd like (but don't need) ECC, Xeons, the most fastest-storage on the planet, etc. I'd be tickled pink with iMac guts in a headless box that can keep itself cool under load. Does Apple have *any* machine that can do that (besides maybe the Mac Pro and iMac Pro)? Especially at a reasonable price? No.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David G.
My wishes are pretty basic. I would like them to release a machine I could buy without feeling like I'm swallowing a bitter pill.

.....

So I'm not looking for anything groundbreaking from Apple in 2018. I'm willing to compromise on upgradeability, ports, the feeling of the keyboard. All I ask for is a reasonably priced and at least averagely performing machine without glaring quality problems and basic features taken away.

It is amazing isn’t it? Apple succeeds nowadays despite themselves, not because of themselves. Virtually zero creative thought and design energy towards flexibility of use, where are fashion/form is so obviously prioritized to the point of caricature and even user pain and and annoyance. It has to happen, just has to, that sometime in the future they will return to intuitive UI’s as well as hardware designs with user flexibility in mind, and I bet they will be marketed as some amazing unique thing.
 
It is amazing isn’t it? Apple succeeds nowadays despite themselves, not because of themselves. Virtually zero creative thought and design energy towards flexibility of use, where are fashion/form is so obviously prioritized to the point of caricature and even user pain and and annoyance. It has to happen, just has to, that sometime in the future they will return to intuitive UI’s as well as hardware designs with user flexibility in mind, and I bet they will be marketed as some amazing unique thing.

Either that, or they return to their mid-90s equivalent w/o the UI edge (i.e. run like a typical tech business)... it's just that they now have hundreds of billions in the bank, and are press-darlings, instead of like 1 billion and couldn't get positive press to save their life.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.