If they are giving out $150 credits, wasting phone reps time, going through the return process etc, I would think it would just be cheaper to upgrade everyone to the 2.4...
Maybe I'm just crazy though.
That, or living in dreamland.
If they are giving out $150 credits, wasting phone reps time, going through the return process etc, I would think it would just be cheaper to upgrade everyone to the 2.4...
Maybe I'm just crazy though.
I called and got a credit of $75 back on my credit card. Not $150 that people are getting but better then nothing
Don't you think Apple should give their sales reps correct information?
Just got off the phone with the Apple Rep , my order was already sent , I complained to the poor unsuspecting woman on the phone but I got a $200 credit for my next order in which I will send my 2.0 back to get the 2.4 w/ backlit keyboard and other extras, and the student discount on a 2.4Ghz Macbook is $100 , so I basically got upgraded for FREE leaving the 2.4GHz price at $1299!
Just got off the phone with the Apple Rep , my order was already sent , I complained to the poor unsuspecting woman on the phone but I got a $200 credit for my next order in which I will send my 2.0 back to get the 2.4 w/ backlit keyboard and other extras, and the student discount on a 2.4Ghz Macbook is $100 , so I basically got upgraded for FREE leaving the 2.4GHz price at $1299!
I wish I saw these posts before I called this morning. I only got $100, but I guess that's ok since they technically didn't have to give anything. But damn, you got a pretty sweet deal!
Look it doesnt matter what the keynote said or anything else. If you order and your order states in the shopping cart
Then this is not a typo, this went thru 3 screens and its false advertising and wrongful purchase or rather bait and switch....
Again see my prior post here, and wth is a wrongful purchase?
Well I meant to say when you think you purchasing 1 thing, but getting another.
Just called, same boat, bought 2.0 on the knowledge that the specs said backlight. Rep confirmed with me, that infact it would have it. (This info is suspect at this point.)
However, I am from Ontario Canada, and if anyone else is also in the same situation, I have done some Legal Research into the, Electronic Commerce Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, CHAPTER 17, and the applicability of such contracts, and the disclaimer.
I am law student, and will run this case past a prof if my response from apple is anything less than compliance with the contract made. There is some relevant case law in terms of 'battle of forms' that I think is applicable in this case in regards to apple's terms - the jurisprudence seems to support that they need to bring to attention at the time of the contract that the reserve the right to make errors.
Anyways, will keep you posted of how this is resolved.
Not sure what year you are in Law School or how they do things up there in Canada - but Contracts 101; you should learn about an adhesion contract, which this is. By accepting the T&O of purchasing online you accept the term that Apple reserves the right to cancel any order due to a typographical error.
Just playing devils advocate - what happens when they don't catch the "mistake", ship the order, and charge the buyer?
Just called, same boat, bought 2.0 on the knowledge that the specs said backlight. Rep confirmed with me, that infact it would have it. (This info is suspect at this point.)
However, I am from Ontario Canada, and if anyone else is also in the same situation, I have done some Legal Research into the, Electronic Commerce Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, CHAPTER 17, and the applicability of such contracts, and the disclaimer.
I am law student, and will run this case past a prof if my response from apple is anything less than compliance with the contract made. There is some relevant case law in terms of 'battle of forms' that I think is applicable in this case in regards to apple's terms - the jurisprudence seems to support that they need to bring to attention at the time of the contract that the reserve the right to make errors.
Anyways, will keep you posted of how this is resolved.
Well they have caught the mistake and are already offering people various credits, which I do not think they are entitled to do. But in attempt to keep their customers happy they are trying.
Im sure they will allow you to return the computer at no cost to you.
After ordering my MacBook yesterday (with the understanding that I would receive a backlit keyboard) and after watching threads like this, I decided to call Apple and see what they were going to do about the online mis-communication.
The woman I talked to was very nice, and confirmed that the MacBook 2.0 did NOT have a backlit keyboard. I told her that I had called twice yesterday and talked to people that said that the MB's did in fact have a backlit keyboard (which I in fact did, no lie). She was very polite about it and offered to cancel the order so that I could order the 2.4. All I said was, "oh," and she asked to put me on hold to do some more research. After a little while, she came back and asked if it would be satisfactory if I received a $50 credit on the purchase of the 2.4. All I said was that I still wouldn't be able to afford it, and that's why I bought the 2.0 in the first place. She asked to put me on hold again, and when she came back, she offered me $150 towards the purchase of the 2.4.
When I ordered the 2.0, I upgraded the hd to 250 gb, so that was an additional 90 bucks (with student discount). Therefore, because of the $150 credit:
Total Price of 2.0: $1249 + $90 = $1339
Total Price of 2.4: $1499 - $150 = $1349
So for $10 bucks more I was able to buy the 2.4. Apple's made me a happy customer.
When everything was said and done, the women thanked me over and over for being so understanding and polite, as she had apparently had many rude and angry customers call in today.
Just be nice, and maybe you'll get a good credit people.
That is a fair deal.
I have already incurred a significant cost of wasted time. I purchased based on the assurance of several of their employees that this model HAD a backlit screen. They have not offered me any sort of credit and just a straight up return doesnt cut it at this point.
If they want to keep their customer happy, they can fill my order or figure out a way to make it up to me.
Just called, same boat, bought 2.0 on the knowledge that the specs said backlight. Rep confirmed with me, that infact it would have it. (This info is suspect at this point.)
However, I am from Ontario Canada, and if anyone else is also in the same situation, I have done some Legal Research into the, Electronic Commerce Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, CHAPTER 17, and the applicability of such contracts, and the disclaimer.
I am law student, and will run this case past a prof if my response from apple is anything less than compliance with the contract made. There is some relevant case law in terms of 'battle of forms' that I think is applicable in this case in regards to apple's terms - the jurisprudence seems to support that they need to bring to attention at the time of the contract that the reserve the right to make errors.
Anyways, will keep you posted of how this is resolved.