I thought Django Unchained was mediocre. If you like Tarantino movies with lots of blood, you will probably like it. The music had to be the worst part of the movie. Kerry Washington (Django's love interest) also did a terrible acting job in my opinion. Samuel L Jackson did a tremendous job acting and was one of the better antagonist I have seen in a movie. I would still watch it when you get the chance because you may end up enjoying the movie. It may not meet your expectations though.
Thanks for your thoughts on this - very welcome, for, as I commented to jav in an earlier post, I really do prefer word-of-mouth (or social fora) rather than relying on bloated budgets and advertising to tell me what is worth watching.
Re Tarantino, I have mixed feelings, to be honest. While I love spaghetti westerns, they have to be at least a little classy, with a sort of insouciance and elegance; mindless violence on its own does little for me - instead, I prefer the Baroque choreography, arid landscape, scorching heat and excellent soundtrack of a good spaghetti western. This means that I find Tarantino's work to be a bit uneven (he, himself, has used the spaghetti western analogy in an interview); when it is good, it is excellent, but some of his later work....missed the mark.
Reservoir Dogs is very good, but I would not set out to watch it again; if it was on TV, I might take a look. I loved both Jackie Brown and Pulp Fiction, but nothing he has done since then has gripped me.
Unlike some of his other work, Django Unchained received some very good reviews from writers I respect, so I have made a mental note to myself to catch it when an opportunity presents itself.
Anyway, once again, thanks for posting your thoughts on the matter.