Why? Just why? (I did sit through the whole thing)
View attachment 2537920
Why? Just why? (I did sit through the whole thing)
Yeah I have to agree. The acting was superb. But the story line was "same-old" story.View attachment 2537616
Over three hours I'll never get back. What a waste of time. A "monumental" disappointment.
To be fair, the movie gets better, but it's still only the old "chased by dinosaurs". The whole purpose was to collect some blood samples. Not that the previous movies were great when it comes to the story (let's not count the original movie), but that was a little thin. I guess the whole idea was to throw "Black Widow" into the action, let her do her thing and hope that's enough to make it as successful as the Avengers. Epic fail.Honestly, the lolly wrapper bringing down the whole containment system was an early harbinger of how bad it was going to be. I gave up soon after.
Honestly, the lolly wrapper bringing down the whole containment system was an early harbinger of how bad it was going to be. I gave up soon after.
The moment that happened was the interdimensional imp (Batmite or Mr. Mxyzptlk?). After that, everything that followed was just working. For most people that's probably not the case. But that's life I guess.
Watched it last night and really liked it. I think Gunn got the humour balance just right as I was worried that GotG in Superman form would be too much. I thought the casting was really good, and this Luther was so much better than the Zuckerberg version we got previously.View attachment 2538368
Great... on an emotional level.
When I saw the first trailer, I was very skeptical. Bringing Krypto into a movie seemed like the most idiotic idea ever. What can I say, it works. It works really well.
When I watched it, I kept thinking, this is bad. It seemed like a fan-service to those who have fond memories of the first Reeves movie (I do). Then I realised what my "problem" is and that's probably the case for most people. We're thrown into a full DC-universe on a level of the last seasons of Arrow, The Flash, Supergirl (more than the others) and Legends of Tomorrow... and we have no idea of how we got there. Once I accepted that, the whole movie just worked for me.
The moment that happened was the interdimensional imp (Batmite or Mr. Mxyzptlk?). After that, everything that followed was just working. For most people that's probably not the case. But that's life I guess.
Nice bridge to next year's Supergirl movie. I'm skeptical again. Pretty safe bet that Krypto will be back. And similar to Superman, it won't be an origin story. It'll be all in, as Lobo is in the movie.
Will rewatch this before Supergirl.
I'm so glad I skipped it when it showed up on my recommended list. I'm skipping a lot of Hollywood stuff as what they crank out is repetitive and stale.😐 They need to stop rehashing old blockbusters and start remaking duds. A lot of awful movies of old were the results of comically bad F/X or acting; some had really good stories. I wouldn't mind a remake of Toxic Avenger. I know of few women who doesn't appreciate a man with a mop.☺️Yeah I have to agree. The acting was superb. But the story line was "same-old" story.
View attachment 2537920
Why? Just why? (I did sit through the whole thing)
View attachment 2538368
Great... on an emotional level.
When I saw the first trailer, I was very skeptical. Bringing Krypto into a movie seemed like the most idiotic idea ever. What can I say, it works. It works really well.
When I watched it, I kept thinking, this is bad. It seemed like a fan-service to those who have fond memories of the first Reeves movie (I do). Then I realised what my "problem" is and that's probably the case for most people. We're thrown into a full DC-universe on a level of the last seasons of Arrow, The Flash, Supergirl (more than the others) and Legends of Tomorrow... and we have no idea of how we got there. Once I accepted that, the whole movie just worked for me.
The moment that happened was the interdimensional imp (Batmite or Mr. Mxyzptlk?). After that, everything that followed was just working. For most people that's probably not the case. But that's life I guess.
Nice bridge to next year's Supergirl movie. I'm skeptical again. Pretty safe bet that Krypto will be back. And similar to Superman, it won't be an origin story. It'll be all in, as Lobo is in the movie.
Will rewatch this before Supergirl.
Personally I place MI up there with James Bond, in some ways above it as at least they didn’t kill off the main character for no other reason then just for the hell of it…
Guardians of the Galaxy 2 (2014)- Wonderful.
Agreed, disappointed (blah), hoping eventually for a 4 to maybe redeem itself.Making me want to re-watch them myself lol. Part 3 is a bit meh though.
View attachment 2538368
Great... on an emotional level.
When I saw the first trailer, I was very skeptical. Bringing Krypto into a movie seemed like the most idiotic idea ever. What can I say, it works. It works really well.
When I watched it, I kept thinking, this is bad. It seemed like a fan-service to those who have fond memories of the first Reeves movie (I do). Then I realised what my "problem" is and that's probably the case for most people. We're thrown into a full DC-universe on a level of the last seasons of Arrow, The Flash, Supergirl (more than the others) and Legends of Tomorrow... and we have no idea of how we got there. Once I accepted that, the whole movie just worked for me.
The moment that happened was the interdimensional imp (Batmite or Mr. Mxyzptlk?). After that, everything that followed was just working. For most people that's probably not the case. But that's life I guess.
Nice bridge to next year's Supergirl movie. I'm skeptical again. Pretty safe bet that Krypto will be back. And similar to Superman, it won't be an origin story. It'll be all in, as Lobo is in the movie.
Will rewatch this before Supergirl.
Thanks, I won't waste my time!View attachment 2540436
As expected, typical MI movie which worked for me.
View attachment 2540437
And then they had to push it over the edge. The action is spot on, the story has more plot holes than black holes in the universe. The story is on a level of a 5 year old writer using an AI. Not only is "the AI is going to kill us all" a little dated, it's also executed very poorly. While I'm generally ok with popcorn movies, this is a new level of stupid (the amount of cringeworthy scenes is through the roof).
I like Mission Impossible the original movie but I don’t think Tom Cruise was in charge there. Mission Impossible 2 broke me, over the top goes way back. I’ve glanced at follow on chapters after I can stream them for free, or should I say not pay a rental fee and they just don’t do it for me.View attachment 2540436
As expected, typical MI movie which worked for me.
View attachment 2540437
And then they had to push it over the edge. The action is spot on, the story has more plot holes than black holes in the universe. The story is on a level of a 5 year old writer using an AI. Not only is "the AI is going to kill us all" a little dated, it's also executed very poorly. While I'm generally ok with popcorn movies, this is a new level of stupid (the amount of cringeworthy scenes is through the roof).
Same. Part 2 was just terrible, and 3 was pretty bad too. After that it got better. I’d rate the last one about the same as Part 2, just in different ways.Mission Impossible 2 broke me, over the top goes way back.