Thanks for for giving me permission (after the fact) to choose my next car.My point is that Musk isn't the great innovator he's painted out to be, or indeed at all. All he is, is an investor turned public face of which ever company he is currently involved in. If you have invested to get a Tesla then good for you, just don't do it thinking somehow what they offer is much different to what is already on offer and is really good for the environment, because it's not. If people can accept that and actually like the cars Tesla offers (which I personally thing are a bit too minimalistic, especially on the inside) then good for them and good for you, we all get our cars etc on personal taste.
Musk is the handsomest, smartest, most innovative, most honest, clearest thinking, most interesting, most empathetic, sexiest, luckiest, greenest, most democratic, most inspiring person in the world today. Perhaps of all time.
Obviously not a single one of those superlatives is is objectively true, let alone all of them strung together. Yet he is succeeding where few ever do. Obviously he has a mixture of qualities that allows this to be the case. If you are looking at just one of them, such as "innovative" and trying to either explain his success or dismiss it, you're missing the big picture.
Musk is the guy who managed, without being "innovative" to be the best-selling electric vehicle maker (and then to eclipse those sales with hundreds of thousands of preorders for his next EV). He managed without being "innovative" to send a rocket into space and then to land that rocket upright on a barge at sea. He seems on the verge of doubling the top speed of maglev trains with no "innovation" at all. I'm starting to think "innovation" isn't as important as you seem to think it is. Certainly it isn't the key to his success. But the success is real. Nibbling at the margins doesn't change that.